Pedestrian's risk-based negotiation model for self-driving vehicles to get the right of way.

Negotiations among drivers and pedestrians are common on roads, but it is still challenging for a self-driving vehicle to negotiate for its right of way with other human road users, especially pedestrians. Currently, the self-driving vehicles are programmed for conservative behavior, yielding to approaching pedestrians. Consequently, the future urban traffic will slow down significantly. In this paper, a conceptual model of vehicle-pedestrian negotiation is proposed. This model allows individual decision making of multiple vehicles and pedestrians, extending a prior negotiation model for a single vehicle and a single pedestrian. The possible negotiation opportunities for vehicles are modeled considering different risk-taking behaviors of pedestrians. Simulation results show an overall improvement in the waiting time of vehicles and thus in the intersection throughput, compared to conservative vehicle behavior. The simulation results show also that the benefit of reduced waiting times for vehicles comes at the cost of some waiting time for pedestrians. However, the observed pedestrian waiting times in this model are not more than the generally accepted waiting times reported in empirical studies.

[1]  Andreas Riener,et al.  Strategies for Negotiation between Autonomous Vehicles and Pedestrians , 2015, MuC Workshopband.

[2]  Danya Yao,et al.  A Survey of Traffic Control With Vehicular Communications , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[3]  Stephan Winter,et al.  Negotiation Between Vehicles and Pedestrians for the Right of Way at Intersections , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[4]  John K. Tsotsos,et al.  Understanding Pedestrian Behavior in Complex Traffic Scenes , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles.

[5]  R Kulmala,et al.  An application of logit models in analysing the behaviour of pedestrians and car drivers on pedestrian crossings. , 1988, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  Malte Risto,et al.  The social behavior of autonomous vehicles , 2016, UbiComp Adjunct.

[7]  J. Krause,et al.  Collective behavior in road crossing pedestrians: the role of social information , 2010 .

[8]  P. Vedagiri,et al.  Modelling pedestrian road crossing behaviour under mixed traffic condition , 2013 .

[9]  Stephan Winter,et al.  Conventionalized gestures for the interaction of people in traffic with autonomous vehicles , 2016, IWCTS@SIGSPATIAL.

[10]  V. Bruce,et al.  Do the eyes have it? Cues to the direction of social attention , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[11]  John K. Tsotsos,et al.  Are They Going to Cross? A Benchmark Dataset and Baseline for Pedestrian Crosswalk Behavior , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCVW).

[12]  Viola Cavallo,et al.  Age-related differences in street-crossing decisions: the effects of vehicle speed and time constraints on gap selection in an estimation task. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  Adam Millard-Ball,et al.  Pedestrians, Autonomous Vehicles, and Cities , 2016 .

[14]  Sarah Schmidt,et al.  Pedestrians at the kerb – Recognising the action intentions of humans , 2009 .

[15]  Baibing Li,et al.  A model of pedestrians' intended waiting times for street crossings at signalized intersections , 2013 .

[16]  Thomas Winkle,et al.  Safety Benefits of Automated Vehicles: Extended Findings from Accident Research for Development, Validation and Testing , 2016 .

[17]  Heikki Summala,et al.  Cross-cultural differences in driving behaviours: A comparison of six countries , 2006 .

[18]  Matt Richtel,et al.  Google’s Driverless Cars Run into Problem: Cars with Drivers , 2015 .

[19]  John Cohen,et al.  The Risk Taken in Crossing a Road , 1955 .

[20]  Joost C. F. de Winter,et al.  Interaction between pedestrians and automated vehicles: A Wizard of Oz experiment , 2018, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[21]  Robert B. Noland,et al.  Behavioural Issues in Pedestrian Speed Choice and Street Crossing Behaviour: A Review , 2008 .

[22]  T. Pitcairn,et al.  Errors in young children's decisions about traffic gaps: experiments with roadside simulations. , 1992, British journal of psychology.

[23]  Pavlo Molchanov,et al.  Multi-sensor system for driver's hand-gesture recognition , 2015, 2015 11th IEEE International Conference and Workshops on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG).

[24]  W. Andrew Harrell,et al.  Factors influencing pedestrian cautiousness in crossing streets , 1991 .

[25]  Yuichi Iizuka,et al.  Passing Encounters East and West: Comparing Japanese and American Pedestrian Interactions , 2007 .

[26]  S. Shladover The Truth about "Self-Driving" Cars. , 2016, Scientific American.

[27]  Robert J. Schneider,et al.  Pedestrian Safety Practitioners' Perspectives of Driver Yielding Behavior across North America , 2015 .

[28]  Christoph Luetge,et al.  The German Ethics Code for Automated and Connected Driving , 2017 .

[29]  I. William Zartman,et al.  Common elements in the analysis of the negotiation process , 1988 .

[30]  B Fildes,et al.  Differences in traffic judgements between young and old adult pedestrians. , 1997, Accident; analysis and prevention.