Motor learning and occupational therapy: the organization of practice.

This article addresses implications for the practice of occupational therapy when that therapy is guided by theories of motor learning. In occupational therapy, clients must learn or relearn motor skills through the use of activities. The occupational therapist must present activities in a manner that elicits the retention and transfer of the desired skills for use in functional settings. Therefore, the therapist should strive for acquisition conditions that facilitate retention and transfer of the learned skills. The processes that underlie motor learning should guide therapy. Three major factors that affect motor learning are environmental conditions, cognitive processes, and movement organization. Examination of the clinical implications of these factors, however, results in contradictory predictions regarding optimal practice conditions for motor skills. This article explores the successful integration of these factors and its application in occupational therapy practice. It is suggested that increasing the difficulty of the learning context during practice is beneficial for retention.

[1]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Knowledge of results and motor learning: a review and critical reappraisal. , 1984, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  R. Kerr Practice Variability and Longer and Short Retention Intervals , 1982, Perceptual and motor skills.

[3]  P. N. Clark Human development through occupation: a philosophy and conceptual model for practice, part 2. , 1979, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[4]  H Heuer,et al.  Testing the invariance of relative timing: comment on Gentner (1987). , 1988, Psychological review.

[5]  J. Brudny,et al.  Sensory feedback therapy for stroke patients. , 1976, Geriatrics.

[6]  R. Magill,et al.  Activity during the Post-KR Interval: Effects upon Performance or Learning?. , 1983 .

[7]  T. D. Lee,et al.  Influence of practice schedule on testing schema theory predictions in adults. , 1985, Journal of motor behavior.

[8]  N. A. Bernshteĭn The co-ordination and regulation of movements , 1967 .

[9]  D. C. Shapiro,et al.  Variability of practice and transfer of training. , 1976, Journal of motor behavior.

[10]  L. Dijoseph Independence through activity: mind, body, and environment interaction in therapy. , 1982, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[11]  M. Whitehurst,et al.  Contextual Interference and Experience in Acquisition and Transfer , 1983 .

[12]  S. Iversen Motor control , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[13]  Richard A. Schmidt,et al.  The learning of generalized motor programs: Reducing the relative frequency of knowledge of results enhances memory. , 1989 .

[14]  Charles H. Shea,et al.  Contextual interference: Contributions of practice , 1990 .

[15]  P Del Rey,et al.  Effects of Contextual Interference on the Memory of Older Females Differing in Levels of Physical Activity , 1982, Perceptual and motor skills.

[16]  J. Gliner,et al.  The Effects of Movement Speed and Initial Position on Movement Reproduction Accuracy , 1984 .

[17]  D. Gentner Timing of Skilled Motor Performance: Tests of the Proportional Duration Model. , 1987 .

[18]  J. Gliner Purposeful activity in motor learning theory: an event approach to motor skill acquisition. , 1985, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[19]  R. Magill,et al.  Can Forgetting Facilitate Skill Acquisition , 1985 .

[20]  Clark Pn Human development through occupation: theoretical frameworks in contemporary occupational therapy practice, part 1. , 1979 .

[21]  J. M. Wood,et al.  Effects of Experience and Contextual Interference on Learning and Transfer by Boys and Girls , 1983 .

[22]  M A Arbib,et al.  Schemas for the temporal organization of behaviour. , 1985, Human neurobiology.

[23]  J. Shea,et al.  Knowledge incorporation in motor representation , 1988 .

[24]  G. Sage,et al.  Motor Learning and Control: A Neuropsychological Approach , 1984 .

[25]  J. Shea,et al.  Effects of Relative Frequency of Knowledge of Results on Retention of a Motor Skill , 1978, Perceptual and motor skills.

[26]  Tal Jarus,et al.  Is More Always Better? Optimal Amounts of Feedback in Learning to Calibrate Sensory Awareness , 1995 .

[27]  A. Ayres Sensory integration and learning disorders , 1973 .

[28]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning. , 1990 .

[29]  Joseph R. Higgins,et al.  Relationship Between Consistency of Movement and Environmental Condition , 1972 .

[30]  R. Magill,et al.  A REVIEW OF THE CONTEXTUAL INTERFERENCE EFFECT IN MOTOR SKILL ACQUISITION , 1990 .

[31]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[32]  R. Magill,et al.  On the Locus of Contextual Interference in Motor Skill Acquisition. , 1983 .

[33]  J. A. Adams Feedback theory of how joint receptors regulate the timing and positioning of a limb. , 1977, Psychological review.

[34]  G. Stelmach,et al.  A test of the schema theory of discrete motor learning. , 1977, Journal of motor behavior.

[35]  G Wulf,et al.  Variability in practice: facilitation in retention and transfer through schema formation or context effects? , 1988, Journal of motor behavior.

[36]  Motor control and the role of occupational therapy: past, present, and future. , 1989, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[37]  P. N. Clark Human development through occupation: theoretical frameworks in contemporary occupational therapy practice, part 1. , 1979, American Journal of Occupational Therapy.

[38]  N. Katz Occupational therapy's domain of concern: reconsidered. , 1985, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[39]  Fidler Gs,et al.  Doing and becoming: purposeful action and self-actualization. , 1978 .

[40]  Effects of Frequency and Specificity of Information Feedback on Acquisition and Extinction of a Positioning Task , 1972 .

[41]  Stephan P. Swinnen,et al.  Summary knowledge of results for skill acquisition: support for the guidance hypothesis , 1989 .

[42]  J. Shea,et al.  When forgetting benefits motor retention. , 1991, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[43]  J. Shea,et al.  Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. , 1979 .

[44]  R. Magill,et al.  Contextual Interference Effects in Learning Three Badminton Serves , 1986 .

[45]  J. Adams,et al.  A closed-loop theory of motor learning. , 1971, Journal of motor behavior.

[46]  T G Reeve,et al.  Variability of Prior Practice in Learning and Retention of a Novel Motor Response , 1978, Perceptual and motor skills.

[47]  R. Schmidt A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. , 1975 .

[48]  M Whitehurst,et al.  The effects of contextual interference on females with varied experience in open sport skills. , 1982, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[49]  A. Gentile A Working Model of Skill Acquisition with Application to Teaching , 1972 .

[50]  John B. Shea,et al.  Context Effects in Memory and Learning Movement Information , 1983 .

[51]  L. Llorens Activity analysis: agreement among factors in a sensory processing model. , 1986, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[52]  P. Del Rey,et al.  Level of Expertise, Interpolated Activity and Contextual Interference Effects on Memory and Transfer , 1987 .

[53]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Transfer of learning among motor patterns with different relative timing. , 1988 .

[54]  T. Mulder,et al.  Sensory feedback therapy and theoretical knowledge of motor control and learning. , 1984, American journal of physical medicine.

[55]  A. Gentile,et al.  Skill acquisition : Action, movement, and neuromotor processes , 1987 .

[56]  D. C. Shapiro,et al.  Summary knowledge of results for skill acquisition: support for the guidance hypothesis. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[57]  J. Poole,et al.  Application of motor learning principles in occupational therapy. , 1991, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[58]  P. Del Rey,et al.  Effects of Contextual Interference and Retention Intervals on Transfer , 1982 .

[59]  Douglas E. Young,et al.  Contextual interference and motor skill acquisition: On the processes that influence retention , 1993 .

[60]  Patricia Del Rey,et al.  Effects of contextual interference on the memory of older females differing in levels of physical activity. , 1982 .

[61]  D. Gentner Observed movements reflect both central and peripheral mechanisms: Reply to Heuer. , 1988 .

[62]  K. Tigges On philosophy of occupational therapy. , 1972, South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde.

[63]  C A Wrisberg,et al.  Further tests of Schmidt's schema theory: development of a schema rule for a coincident timing task. , 1979, Journal of motor behavior.

[64]  L. J. King Toward a Science of Adaptive Responses , 1978 .