Assessing prospective chemistry teachers' understanding of gases through qualitative and quantitative analyses of their concept maps

The use of concept mapping as a tool to measure the meaningful learning of students is the focus of this study. The study was carried out with 24 last year students (22 years old) from the Department of Chemistry Teaching at Fatih Faculty of Education, Karadeniz Technical University (KTU). Prospective Chemistry Teachers (PCT) were asked to create concept maps using a list of given concepts related to gases. An examination of the PCTs' maps revealed that the students could not form hierarchical maps even after being shown examples of the basic elements and meaningful propositions between the concepts. After being provided with feedback about their concept maps and trained to form non-hierarchical concept maps, the students were asked to create new maps. This time they were allowed to use either hierarchical or non-hierarchical maps. When their new maps were examined, we found that most of the PCTs formed non-hierarchical maps. However, they still could not form meaningful relationships between the given concepts. We also found that the PCTs had some misconceptions about gases and kinetic molecular theory that explains gas behavior. The study ended up with some suggestions and implications for educators and researchers related to pre-service teachers' training.

[1]  Mary B. Nakhleh,et al.  An Investigation of the Value of Using Concept Maps in General Chemistry , 2001 .

[2]  Investigating the effect of complexity factors in gas law problems , 2012 .

[3]  Miles Pickering.  Further studies on concept learning versus problem solving , 1990 .

[4]  F. Marton,et al.  Students' conceptions of matter. , 1990 .

[5]  Joseph D. Novak,et al.  Learning How to Learn , 1984 .

[6]  Kimberly Jo Smith,et al.  Evaluating Student Understanding of Solution Chemistry through Microscopic Representations , 1996 .

[7]  R. Shavelson,et al.  Problems and Issues in the Use of Concept Maps in Science Assessment. , 1996 .

[8]  Michael E. Loverude.  Student Understanding of The First Law of Thermodynamics , 2002 .

[9]  Lillian C. McDermott,et al.  Student understanding of the ideal gas law, Part I: A macroscopic perspective , 2005 .

[10]  Osman Nafiz Kaya,et al.  A Student-centred Approach: Assessing the Changes in Prospective Science Teachers’ Conceptual Understanding by Concept Mapping in a General Chemistry Laboratory , 2008 .

[11]  A. Ayas,et al.  Investigating the effectiveness of a POE-based teaching activity on students’ understanding of condensation , 2012 .

[12]  K. Taber.  Classroom-based Research and Evidence-based Practice , 2007 .

[13]  Ruth Stavy.  Children's Conception of Gas. , 1988 .

[14]  Els Van Zele,et al.  Improving the usefulness of concept maps as a research tool for science education , 2004 .

[15]  Edmund A. Marek,et al.  A cross‐age study of student understanding of the concept of homeostasis , 1992 .

[16]  Susan C. Nurrenbern,et al.  Concept Learning versus Problem Solving: Is There a Difference?. , 1987 .

[17]  S. Haggerty,et al.  Becoming A Secondary School Science Teacher , 1999 .

[18]  Mary B. Nakhleh,et al.  Concept learning versus problem solving: There is a difference , 1993 .

[19]  Barbara A. Sawrey.  Concept learning versus problem solving: Revisited , 1990 .

[20]  Matthew L. Miller,et al.  Assessing Student Understanding of General Chemistry with Concept Mapping , 2002 .

[21]  Paul Black,et al.  Children's interpretation of dissolving , 1991 .

[22]  R. Shavelson,et al.  Comparison of the reliability and validity of scores from two concept‐mapping techniques* , 2001 .

[23]  Richard K. Coll,et al.  A comparative study of the effects of a concept mapping enhanced laboratory experience on Turkish high school students’ understanding of acid-base chemistry , 2009 .

[24]  Sharan B. Merriam,et al.  Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation , 2009 .

[25]  I. Kinchin,et al.  How a qualitative approach to concept map analysis can be used to aid learning by illustrating patterns of conceptual development , 2000 .

[26]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[27]  A. I. Şen,et al.  The development of a qualitative analyzing method for concept maps , 2004 .

[28]  Joseph D. Novak,et al.  CONCEPT MAPS AS A TOOL TO ASSESS LEARNING IN CHEMISTRY , 1994 .

[29]  M. G. Jones,et al.  The concept map as a research and evaluation tool: Further evidence of validity , 1994 .

[30]  Jon Scaife,et al.  Using interviews to assess children's understanding of science concepts , 1997 .

[31]  Pinar Seda.  Facilitating Conceptual Change in Gases Concepts , 2009 .

[32]  D. Treagust,et al.  Using Visualisations in Secondary School Physics Teaching and Learning: Evaluating the Efficacy of an Instructional Program to Facilitate Understanding of Gas and Liquid Pressure Concepts , 2012 .

[33]  C. Liew,et al.  The effectiveness of predict-observe-explain technique in diagnosing students' understanding of science and identifying their level of achievement , 2004 .

[34]  Cheryl L. Mason,et al.  Concept mapping: A tool to develop reflective science instruction , 1992 .

[35]  Matthew Kearney,et al.  Classroom Use of Multimedia-Supported Predict–Observe–Explain Tasks in a Social Constructivist Learning Environment , 2004 .

[36]  Mary B. Nakhleh,et al.  Are Our Students Conceptual Thinkers or Algorithmic Problem Solvers? Identifying Conceptual Students in General Chemistry , 1993 .