Current practice and clinical relevance of somatosensory assessment after stroke

Objective: To examine the perceived clinical relevance, current practice and knowledge of somatosensory testing in three professional groups involved in the management and rehabilitation of stroke. Design: Structured postal questionnaire sent to therapists and doctors. Subjects: One hundred and eighty occupational therapists from the National Association of Neurological Occupational Therapists (NANOT), 180 physiotherapists from the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists with an Interest in Neurology (ACPIN) and 360 doctors from the Association of British Neurologists (ABN) and the British Geriatrics Society (BSG). Setting: Hospitals and rehabilitation centres in the UK. Results: Replies were obtained from 84 occupational therapists (47%), 98 physiotherapists (55%) and 78 doctors (22%). Sixty-four occupational therapists (77%), 82 physiotherapists (84%) and 66 doctors (87%) indicated that they routinely performed somatosensory assessment as part of their clinical assessment. The two most commonly used measures were proprioception and light touch. Seventy-eight occupational therapists (93%), 88 physiotherapists (90%) and 67 doctors (91%) regarded sensory assessment as clinically significant in determining prognosis after stroke. Conclusions: Despite published reservations concerning its usefulness and reliability, most therapists and doctors routinely assess somatosensory loss after stroke. All three professions agreed that somatosensory testing presented useful information for prognosis. Furthermore, all professional groups believe somatosensory assessment to be clinically relevant.

[1]  R. Dykes,et al.  Sensory loss in the hand after sensory stroke: therapeutic rationale. , 1988, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[2]  Joanna Jackson Approaches to neurological rehabilitation by physiotherapists , 1994 .

[3]  M. Reding,et al.  Rehabilitation outcome following initial unilateral hemispheric stroke. Life table analysis approach. , 1988, Stroke.

[4]  M. Dombovy,et al.  Rehabilitation for stroke: a review. , 1986, Stroke.

[5]  F. Tomasello,et al.  Assessment of inter‐observer differences in the Italian multicenter study on reversible cerebral ischemia. , 1982, Stroke.

[6]  B. Nilsson,et al.  The relationship between sensory impairment and motor recovery in patients with hemiplegia. , 1985, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[7]  Roberta B. Shepherd,et al.  A motor relearning programme for stroke , 1982 .

[8]  Oreon K. Timm,et al.  REHABILITATION—TO WHAT? * , 1967 .

[9]  Robert C. Wolpert,et al.  A Review of the , 1985 .

[10]  D. Wade,et al.  Measurement in neurological rehabilitation. , 1992, Current opinion in neurology and neurosurgery.

[11]  N. Lincoln,et al.  Assessment of motor function in stroke patients. , 1979, Physiotherapy.

[12]  W. Garraway,et al.  Neurologic examination in stroke rehabilitation: adequacy of its description in clinical textbooks. , 1985, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[13]  K. Leo,et al.  Relationship between perception of joint position sense and limb synergies in patients with hemiplegia. , 1981, Physical therapy.

[14]  L. Carey,et al.  Impaired limb position sense after stroke: a quantitative test for clinical use. , 1996, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[15]  Nadina B. Lincoln,et al.  The unreliability of sensory assessments , 1991 .

[16]  R. Dykes,et al.  Evaluating sustained touch-pressure in severe sensory deficits: meeting an unanswered need. , 1990, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  N. Proffitt Neurological physiotherapy , 1997 .

[18]  Sheila Lennon,et al.  The Bobath concept: a critical review of the theoretical assumptions that guide physiotherapy practice in stroke rehabilitation , 1996 .

[19]  Neurological examination in clinical practice , 1968 .

[20]  Leeanne M. Carey,et al.  Somatosensory Loss after Stroke , 1995 .

[21]  B. Bobath Adult hemiplegia: Evaluation and treatment , 1978 .

[22]  R G Smith,et al.  Observer variation in the clinical assessment of stroke. , 1976, Age and ageing.

[23]  J. Newton,et al.  General practitioners and clinical guidelines: a survey of knowledge, use and beliefs. , 1996, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[24]  R. Adams,et al.  Principles of Neurology , 1996 .

[25]  D. Dillman The Design and Administration of Mail Surveys , 1991 .