Results variability in accredited building energy performance compliance demonstration software in the UK: an inter-model comparative study

In the context of performance-based building regulations, the benefits provided by building energy performance prediction tools in facilitating the exploration of innovative approaches to achieving performance requirements has been recognized. In accordance with the Directive on Energy Performance of Buildings (EPBD), the UK has introduced a methodology that allows the use of accredited third-party software for demonstrating compliance with energy performance criteria outlined in the relevant technical guidance for the non-domestic sector. This study investigates the issue of predictive inconsistencies between accredited tools available at the time of writing and presents the final results of an inter-model comparative analysis that examines the extent of variability in key compliance outputs. An overview of tool applicability limitations and issues associated with results variability are presented. Implications concerning the credibility of the methodology and recommendations to address current shortcomings are noted.

[1]  P.J.C.J. De Wilde,et al.  Computational Support for the Selection of Energy Saving Building Components , 2004 .

[2]  P. R. Rittelmann,et al.  Design tool survey. IEA Solar Heating and Cooling - Task 8. Passive and hybrid solar low-energy buildings, Subtask C: design methods , 1985 .

[3]  Rokia Raslan.  AN ANALYSIS OF RESULTS VARIABILITY IN ENERGY PERFORMANCE COMPLIANCE VERIFICATION TOOLS , 2009 .

[4]  Laurent Mora,et al.  BEHAVIOURAL COMPARISON OF SOME PREDICTIVE TOOLS USED IN A LOW-ENERGY BUILDING , 2009 .

[5]  Ross Gagliano,et al.  Review of , 2006, UBIQ.

[6]  Rokia Raslan,et al.  An analysis of industry capability for the implementation of a software-based compliance approach for the UK Building Regulations 2006 , 2010 .

[7]  Gudni Jóhannesson,et al.  Accuracy of Energy Analysis of Buildings: A Comparison of a Monthly Energy Balance Method and Simulation Methods in Calculating the Energy Consumption and the Effect of Thermal Mass , 2008 .

[8]  Fredrik Karlsson,et al.  Measured and predicted energy demand of a low energy building: important aspects when using Building Energy Simulation , 2007 .

[9]  Godfried Augenbroe,et al.  Trends in building simulation , 2002 .

[10]  R. Judkoff,et al.  International Energy Agency Building Energy Simulation Test and Diagnostic Method for Heating, Ventilating, and Air-Conditioning Equipment Models (HVAC BESTEST); Volume 1: Cases E100-E200 , 2002 .

[11]  Luis Pérez-Lombard,et al.  A review on buildings energy consumption information , 2008 .

[12]  Kangsoo Kim,et al.  Simplified energy prediction method accounting for part-load performance of chiller , 2007 .

[13]  Joseph Andrew Clarke,et al.  A CO-OPERATING SOLVER APPROACH TO BUILDING SIMULATION , 2004 .

[14]  Paul Strachan.  Simulation support for performance assessment of building components , 2008 .

[15]  Neveen Hamza,et al.  Energy conservation regulations: Impacts on design and procurement of low energy buildings , 2009 .

[16]  Tadj Oreszczyn,et al.  THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A SIMULATION CAPABILITY TO SUPPORT THE ENGLAND AND WALES BUILDING REGULATIONS 2006 , 2007 .

[17]  Jlm Jan Hensen,et al.  Building and environmental performance simulation : current state and future issues , 2001 .

[18]  Ian Beausoleil-Morrison,et al.  Integrated comparative validation tests as an aid for building simulation tool users and developers , 2006 .

[19]  J. Hand,et al.  AN APPLICATION MANUAL FOR BUILDING ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING , 1997 .

[20]  Abdullatif Ben-Nakhi,et al.  Development and integration of a user friendly validation module within whole building dynamic simulation , 2003 .

[21]  R. Judkoff,et al.  Home energy rating system building energy simulation test (HERS BESTEST). Volume 2, Tier 1 and Tier 2 tests reference results , 1995 .

[22]  R Raslan,et al.  Implementation of a simulation-based compliance methodology for the UK building regulations 2006: an industry survey , 2006 .

[23]  R. Judkoff,et al.  International Energy Agency building energy simulation test (BESTEST) and diagnostic method , 1995 .

[24]  Georgios Kokogiannakis,et al.  Support for the integration of simulation in the European Energy Performance of Buildings Directive , 2009 .

[25]  Kevin J. Lomas,et al.  Empirical validation of building energy simulation programs , 1997 .

[26]  Andrew Marsh,et al.  A COMPUTATIONAL APPROACH TO REGULATORY COMPLIANCE , 2005 .

[27]  Jon Hand,et al.  CIBSE standard tests for the assessment of building services design software , 2004 .

[28]  R. Judkoff,et al.  Applying the building energy simulation test (BESTEST) diagnostic method to verification of space conditioning equipment models used in whole-building energy simulation programs , 2002 .

[29]  J. Neymark,et al.  International Energy Agency Building Energy Simulation Test and Diagnostic Method for Heating, Ventilating, and Air-Conditioning Equipment Models (HVAC BESTEST): Volume 2: Cases E300-E545. , 2004 .

[30]  Mervin Dean Doyle.  Investigation of Dynamic and Steady State Calculation Methodologies for Determination of Building Energy Performance in the Context of the EPBD , 2008 .

[31]  Richard E. Nance,et al.  Simulation modeling methodology: principles and etiology of decision support , 1995 .

[32]  Jon Hand,et al.  CONTRASTING THE CAPABILITIES OF BUILDING ENERGY PERFORMANCE SIMULATION PROGRAMS , 2008 .

[33]  R. Judkoff,et al.  Model Validation and Testing: The Methodological Foundation of ASHRAE Standard 140 , 2006 .

[34]  Jay Burch,et al.  Methodology for Validating Building Energy Analysis Simulations , 2008 .