Investigation of several types of nonlinearities for use in stereo acoustic echo cancellation

In this paper, we investigate several types of nonlinearities used for the unique identification of receiving room impulse responses in stereo acoustic echo cancellation. The effectiveness is quantified by the mutual coherence of the transformed signals. The perceptual degradation is studied by psycho-acoustic experiments in terms of subjective quality and localization accuracy in the medial plane. The results indicate that, of the several nonlinearities considered, ideal half-wave rectification appears to be the best choice for speech. For music, the nonlinearity parameter of the ideal rectifier must be readjusted. The smoothed rectifier does not require this readjustment, but is a little more difficult to implement.

[1]  Shoji Makino,et al.  New configuration for a stereo echo canceller with nonlinear pre-processing , 1998, Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, ICASSP '98 (Cat. No.98CH36181).

[2]  Harry F. Olson.  Modern sound reproduction , 1972 .

[3]  James L. Flanagan,et al.  HuMaNet: An experimental human-machine communications network based on ISDN wideband audio , 1990 .

[4]  John G. Proakis,et al.  Probability, random variables and stochastic processes , 1985, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[5]  Jacob Benesty,et al.  Synthesized stereo combined with acoustic echo cancellation for desktop conferencing , 1998, Bell Labs Technical Journal.

[6]  L. A. Jeffress,et al.  Differences of interaural phase and level in detection and lateralization: 250 Hz. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Bruno O. Shubert,et al.  Random variables and stochastic processes , 1979 .

[8]  Jont B. Allen,et al.  Image method for efficiently simulating small‐room acoustics , 1976 .

[9]  W. M. Hall.  A Method for Maintaining in a Public Address System the Illusion that the Sound Comes from the Speaker's Mouth , 1936 .

[10]  J. L. Hall,et al.  Model for mechanical to neural transduction in the auditory receptor. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  M B Gardner,et al.  Historical background of the Haas and-or precedence effect. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  André Gilloire,et al.  Using auditory properties to improve the behaviour of stereophonic acoustic echo cancellers , 1998, Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, ICASSP '98 (Cat. No.98CH36181).

[13]  Jacob Benesty,et al.  A better understanding and an improved solution to the specific problems of stereophonic acoustic echo cancellation , 1998, IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process..

[14]  Jacob Benesty,et al.  A hybrid mono/stereo acoustic echo canceler , 1998, IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process..

[15]  Richard F. Baum.  The correlation function of Gaussian noise passed through nonlinear devices , 1969, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[16]  L. A. Jeffress,et al.  Differences of interaural phase and level in detection and lateralization: 250 Hz. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  J. L. Hall,et al.  Stereophonic acoustic echo cancellation-an overview of the fundamental problem , 1995, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[18]  A. Mills.  On the minimum audible angle , 1958 .