Interruption revisited: Affiliative vs. disaffiliative intervention

Abstract Following the Sacks et al. (1974) model of conversation which defines simultaneity as violation, a number of researchers (Zimmerman and West, 1975; West and Zimmerman, 1983; Murray and Covelli, 1988; Leet-Pellegrini, 1980) have quantitatively investigated the interrupting habits of women and men - which they have found to differ dramatically - solely in terms of distance from projected transition-relevance place. This paper re-defines simultaneity in terms of its function from the point of view of ‘face’/ ‘preference’, i.e. in light of its execution as affiliative or disaffiliative intervention, and relates it to gender. Within this frame which combines ethomethodological Conversation Analysis with the ‘face’-based strategy model (Brown and Levinson, 1987), affiliative intervention is instantiated as addressee-oriented face-saving strategies, preferred second pair parts of adjacency pairs, genuine repair, ratifying back-channel responses, initiation/development of affiliative topics and affiliative topic change/shift, etc. Disaffiliative intervention, i.e. interruption, on the other hand, consists in the antagonistic performance of all the above. On this basis, the two sexes, who otherwise display comparable outputs of simultaneous speech, emerge as having differing perceptions of intrusion into alter's space: for women it is overwhelmingly a tool of support, agreement, ratification, whereas men use it indiscriminately either in support for or dissent from current speaker/topic, although in either case they tend to direct it mainly towards their female interlocutors.

[1]  E. Schegloff.  Sequencing in Conversational Openings , 1968 .

[2]  A. J. Wootton,et al.  Two request forms of four year olds , 1981 .

[3]  N. Fairclough.  Critical and descriptive goals in discourse analysis , 1985 .

[4]  Karl Reisman,et al.  Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking: Contrapuntal Conversations in an Antiguan Village , 1989 .

[5]  E. Goffman.  Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-To-Face Behavior , 1967 .

[6]  Barbara Westbrook Eakins,et al.  Sex differences in human communication , 1978 .

[7]  D. Spender.  Man Made Language , 1980 .

[8]  Anita M. Pomerantz.  Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes , 1984 .

[9]  Carole Edelsky.  Who's got the floor? , 1981, Language in Society.

[10]  D. Tannen.  You just don't understand: women and men in conversation. morrow , 1990 .

[11]  Stephen O. Murray,et al.  Women and men speaking at the same time , 1988 .

[12]  P. Brown,et al.  Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena , 1978 .

[13]  D. Tannen,et al.  Power and Solidarity in Modern Greek Conversation: Disagreeing to Agree , 2010 .

[14]  Emanuel A. Schegloff,et al.  The Relevance of Repair to Syntax-for-Conversation in Discourse and Syntax. , 1979 .

[15]  D. Tannen.  Conversational Style: Analyzing Talk Among Friends , 1984 .

[16]  E. Schegloff,et al.  A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation , 1974 .

[17]  A. J. Wootton,et al.  The management of grantings and rejections by parents in request sequences , 1981 .

[18]  C. J. Zahn.  A reexamination of conversational repair , 1984 .

[19]  P. Fishman,et al.  Interaction: The Work Women Do , 1978 .

[20]  Michael Moerman.  Talking Culture: Ethnography and Conversation Analysis , 1987 .

[21]  Anita M. Pomerantz.  Second assessments : a study of some features of agreements/disagreements , 1975 .

[22]  G. Jefferson.  A Case of Precision Timing in Ordinary Conversation: Overlapped Tag-Positioned Address Terms in Closing Sequences , 1973 .

[23]  D. Tannen.  The machine-gun question: An example of conversational style , 1981 .

[24]  Nessa Wolfson.  A feature of performed narrative: the conversational historical present , 1978, Language in Society.

[25]  V. Yngve.  On getting a word in edgewise , 1970 .

[26]  E. Schegloff,et al.  The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation , 1977 .

[27]  Paul Procter,et al.  Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English , 1978 .

[28]  The conversational historical present , 1989 .

[29]  Marion Owen,et al.  Apologies and Remedial Interchanges , 1983 .

[30]  D. Tannen.  That's Not What I Meant! , 1987 .

[31]  Anita M. Pomerantz.  Compliment Responses: Notes on the Co-operation of Multiple Constraints , 1978, Asking and Telling in Conversation.

[32]  J. Goldberg.  Interrupting the discourse on interruptions , 1990 .

[33]  H. M. Leet-Pellegrini,et al.  Conversational Dominance as a Function of Gender and Expertise , 1980 .

[34]  J. M. Atkinson,et al.  Order in Court: The Organisation of Verbal Interaction in Judicial Settings , 1980 .

[35]  S. Duncan,et al.  On signalling that it's your turn to speak☆ , 1974 .

[36]  E. Schegloff,et al.  Notes on Laughter in the Pursuit of Intimacy , 1987 .

[37]  Penelope Brown,et al.  Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage , 1989 .

[38]  Judy Davidson.  Structures of Social Action: Subsequent versions of invitations, offers, requests, and proposals dealing with potential or actual rejection , 1985 .

[39]  J. D. Starkey.  Toward a Grammar for Dyadic Conversation , 1973 .

[40]  C. D. Claiborn,et al.  Talk and Social Organization. , 1988 .