Users’ perspectives of key factors to implementing electronic health records in Canada: a Delphi study

BackgroundInteroperable electronic health record (EHR) solutions are currently being implemented in Canada, as in many other countries. Understanding EHR users’ perspectives is key to the success of EHR implementation projects. This Delphi study aimed to assess in the Canadian context the applicability, the importance, and the priority of pre-identified factors from a previous mixed-methods systematic review of international literature.MethodsA three-round Delphi study was held with representatives of 4 Canadian EHR user groups defined as partners of the implementation process who use or are expected to use EHR in their everyday activity. These groups are: non-physician healthcare professionals, health information professionals, managers, and physicians. Four bilingual online questionnaire versions were developed from factors identified by the systematic review. Participants were asked to rate the applicability and the importance of each factor. The main outcome measures were consensus and priority. Consensus was defined a priori as strong (≥ 75%) or moderate (≥ 60-74%) according to user groups’ level of agreement on applicability and importance, partial (≥ 60%) when participants agreed only on applicability or importance, or as no consensus (< 60%). Priority for decision-making was defined as factors with strong consensus with scores of 4 or 5 on a five-point Likert scale for applicability and importance.ResultsThree Delphi rounds were completed by 64 participants. Levels of consensus of 100%, 64%, 64%, and 44% were attained on factors submitted to non-physician healthcare professionals, health information professionals, managers, and physicians, respectively. While agreement between and within user groups varied, key factors were prioritized if they were classified as strong (≥ 75% from questionnaire answers of user groups), for decision-making concerning EHR implementation. The10 factors that were prioritized are perceived usefulness, productivity, motivation, participation of end-users in the implementation strategy, patient and health professional interaction, lack of time and workload, resources availability, management, outcome expectancy, and interoperability.ConclusionsAmongst all factors influencing EHR implementation identified in a previous systematic review, ten were prioritized through this Delphi study. The varying levels of agreement between and within user groups could mean that users’ perspectives of each factor are complex and that each user group has unique professional priorities and roles in the EHR implementation process. As more EHR implementations in Canada are completed it will be possible to corroborate this preliminary result with a larger population of EHR users.

[1]  Nina Boulus,et al.  Constructing technology-in-use practices: EPR-adaptation in Canada and Norway. , 2007, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[2]  Réjean Landry,et al.  Telehealth and the recruitment and retention of physicians in rural and remote regions: a Delphi study. , 2007, Canadian journal of rural medicine : the official journal of the Society of Rural Physicians of Canada = Journal canadien de la medecine rurale : le journal officiel de la Societe de medecine rurale du Canada.

[3]  C. Powell.  The Delphi technique: myths and realities. , 2003, Journal of advanced nursing.

[4]  Cathy Schoen,et al.  A survey of primary care physicians in eleven countries, 2009: perspectives on care, costs, and experiences. , 2009, Health affairs.

[5]  Howard Pai,et al.  Is Canada ready for patient accessible electronic health records? A national scan , 2008, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[6]  Donna B. Stoddard,et al.  Getting IT right. , 2004, Harvard business review.

[7]  Rosemary Wilson,et al.  How Do Patients Perceive Electronic Documentation at the Bedside? , 2006, Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality.

[8]  Chia-Chien Hsu,et al.  The Delphi Technique: Making Sense of Consensus , 2007 .

[9]  Johanna I. Westbrook,et al.  Model Formulation: Contextual Implementation Model: A Framework for Assisting Clinical Information System Implementations , 2008, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[10]  Michelle E. Jordan,et al.  The role of conversation in health care interventions: enabling sensemaking and learning , 2009, Implementation science : IS.

[11]  Alexander McCall Smith.  In the midst of sickness. , 2009 .

[12]  Víctor H. Castillo,et al.  A knowledge-based taxonomy of critical factors for adopting electronic health record systems by physicians: a systematic literature review , 2010, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[13]  B. A. Auber,et al.  Adoption of smart cards in the medical sector: the Canadian experience. , 2001, Social science & medicine.

[14]  Georg Duftschmid,et al.  Critical areas of national electronic health record programs - Is our focus correct? , 2010, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[15]  Suzanne D. Pawlowski,et al.  The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[16]  Bryan R. Cole,et al.  Stability of response characteristics of a Delphi panel: application of bootstrap data expansion , 2005, BMC medical research methodology.

[17]  John Doucette,et al.  Primary care physicians' experiences with electronic medical records: implementation experience in community, urban, hospital, and academic family medicine. , 2010, Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien.

[18]  A. Boonstra,et al.  Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions , 2010, BMC health services research.

[19]  France Légaré,et al.  Implementation of an electronic medical record in family practice: a case study. , 2010, Informatics in primary care.

[20]  D. Bates,et al.  A qualitative study of Canada’s experience with the implementation of electronic health information technology , 2011, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[21]  John Doucette,et al.  Primary Care Physicians' Experience with Electronic Medical Records: Barriers to Implementation in a Fee-for-Service Environment , 2008, International journal of telemedicine and applications.

[22]  Ann Silversides,et al.  Canadian physicians playing “catch-up” in adopting electronic medical records , 2010, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[23]  N. Archer,et al.  A Comparison of Physician Pre-Adoption and Adoption Views on Electronic Health Records in Canadian Medical Practices , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.

[24]  D. Morin,et al.  Seniors' views on the use of electronic health records. , 2005, Informatics in primary care.

[25]  M. Gagnon,et al.  Comparison of user groups' perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing electronic health records: a systematic review , 2011, BMC medicine.

[26]  Morgan Price,et al.  Impact of electronic medical record on physician practice in office settings: a systematic review , 2012, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[27]  Brian J Hemens,et al.  Computerized clinical decision support systems for drug prescribing and management: A decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review , 2011, Implementation science : IS.

[28]  France Légaré,et al.  Users' perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing EHR in Canada: A study protocol , 2009, Implementation science : IS.

[29]  M. Adler,et al.  Gazing into the oracle : the Delphi method and its application to social policy and public health , 1996 .

[30]  Sharon E. Straus,et al.  The impact of the electronic medical record on structure, process, and outcomes within primary care: a systematic review of the evidence , 2011, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[31]  Karim Keshavjee,et al.  From benefits evaluation to clinical adoption: making sense of health information system success in Canada. , 2011, Healthcare quarterly.