The Development of the IMIA Knowledge Base

Background: The discipline of health or medical informatics is relatively new in that the literature has existed for only 40 years. The British Computer Society (BCS) health group was of the opinion that work should be undertaken to explore the scope of medical or health informatics. Once the mapping work was completed the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) expressed the wish to develop it further to define the knowledge base of the discipline and produce a comprehensive internationally applicable framework. This article will also highlight the move from the expert opinion of a small group to the analysis of publications to generalise and refine the initial findings, and illustrate the importance of triangulation. Objectives: The aim of the project was to explore the theoretical constructs underpinning the discipline of health informatics and produce a cognitive map of the existing understanding of the discipline and develop the knowledge base of health informatics for the IMIA and the BCS. Method: The five-phase project, described in this article, undertaken to define the discipline of health informatics used four forms of triangulation. Results: The output from the project is a framework giving the 14 major headings (Subjects) and 245 elements, which together describe the current perception of the discipline of health informatics. Conclusion: This article describes how each phase of the project was strengthened, through using triangulation within and between the different phases. This was done to ensure that the investigators could be confident in the confirmation and completeness of data, and assured of the validity and reliability of the final output of the ‘IMIA Knowledge Base’ that was endorsed by the IMIA Board in November 2009.

[1]  B. Bloom.  Taxonomy of educational objectives , 1956 .

[2]  N. Denzin.  The research act in sociology: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods , 1970 .

[3]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[4]  Sekta Lonir Oscarini,et al.  BLOOM'S TAXONOMY: ORIGINAL AND REVISED , 2010 .

[5]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives , 2000 .

[6]  G. Seddon.  The Properties of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives for the Cognitive Domain , 1978 .

[7]  Thomas O'Donoghue,et al.  Qualitative educational research in action : doing and reflecting , 2003 .

[8]  Tim Futing Liao,et al.  The SAGE Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods, Volume II , 2003 .

[9]  F. Wolf,et al.  Enlightened Eclecticism or Hazardous Hotchpotch? Mixed Methods and Triangulation Strategies in Comparative Public Policy Research , 2010 .

[10]  E. Furst.  Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives for the Cognitive Domain: Philosophical and Educational Issues , 1981 .

[11]  M. Patton.  Qualitative research and evaluation methods , 1980 .

[12]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[13]  Nancy M Lorenzi,et al.  Towards IMIA 2015 - the IMIA Strategic Plan , 2007, Yearbook of Medical Informatics.

[14]  Murray Pj.  The IMIA strategic plan--towards IMIA 2015. , 2008 .

[15]  C. Begley,et al.  Using triangulation in nursing research. , 1996, Journal of advanced nursing.

[16]  Fran Ackermann,et al.  Cognitive mapping expert views for policy analysis in the public sector , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  L. Cohen,et al.  Research Methods in Education , 1980 .

[18]  Daniel J. Marcucci.  Louis Cohen, Lawrence Manion, & Keith Morrison (2011). Research methods in education (7a ed.). New York: Routledge. , 2011 .