The determination of stem cell fate by 3D scaffold structures through the control of cell shape.

Stem cell response to a library of scaffolds with varied 3D structures was investigated. Microarray screening revealed that each type of scaffold structure induced a unique gene expression signature in primary human bone marrow stromal cells (hBMSCs). Hierarchical cluster analysis showed that treatments sorted by scaffold structure and not by polymer chemistry suggesting that scaffold structure was more influential than scaffold composition. Further, the effects of scaffold structure on hBMSC function were mediated by cell shape. Of all the scaffolds tested, only scaffolds with a nanofibrous morphology were able to drive the hBMSCs down an osteogenic lineage in the absence of osteogenic supplements. Nanofiber scaffolds forced the hBMSCs to assume an elongated, highly branched morphology. This same morphology was seen in osteogenic controls where hBMSCs were cultured on flat polymer films in the presence of osteogenic supplements (OS). In contrast, hBMSCs cultured on flat polymer films in the absence of OS assumed a more rounded and less-branched morphology. These results indicate that cells are more sensitive to scaffold structure than previously appreciated and suggest that scaffold efficacy can be optimized by tailoring the scaffold structure to force cells into morphologies that direct them to differentiate down the desired lineage.

[1]  John P. Bilezikian,et al.  Principles of Bone Biology , 1996 .

[2]  Joachim Kohn,et al.  Cytoskeleton-based forecasting of stem cell lineage fates , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Peter X Ma,et al.  The influence of three-dimensional nanofibrous scaffolds on the osteogenic differentiation of embryonic stem cells. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[4]  Sheng Lin-Gibson,et al.  X-ray microcomputed tomography for the measurement of cell adhesionand proliferation in polymer scaffolds. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[5]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. , 2007, Nature materials.

[6]  T. Park,et al.  A novel fabrication method of macroporous biodegradable polymer scaffolds using gas foaming salt as a porogen additive. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[7]  Doris A Taylor,et al.  Perfusion-decellularized matrix: using nature's platform to engineer a bioartificial heart , 2008, Nature Medicine.

[8]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. , 2004, Developmental cell.

[9]  James J. Yoo,et al.  Tissue-engineered autologous bladders for patients needing cystoplasty , 2006, The Lancet.

[10]  Wei Sun,et al.  3D microtomographic characterization of precision extruded poly-epsilon-caprolactone scaffolds. , 2004, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[11]  M. Ashburner,et al.  Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[12]  D. Landolt,et al.  Osteoblast-like cells are sensitive to submicron-scale surface structure. , 2006, Clinical oral implants research.

[13]  Zhen W. Zhuang,et al.  Tissue-Engineered Lungs for in Vivo Implantation , 2010, Science.

[14]  A S G Curtis,et al.  Polymer-demixed nanotopography: control of fibroblast spreading and proliferation. , 2002, Tissue engineering.

[15]  D. Mooney,et al.  Engineered bone development from a pre-osteoblast cell line on three-dimensional scaffolds. , 2000, Tissue engineering.

[16]  C. S. Chen,et al.  Geometric control of cell life and death. , 1997, Science.

[17]  P. Ma,et al.  Synthetic nano-scale fibrous extracellular matrix. , 1999, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[18]  P. F. Nealey,et al.  Nanoscale topography of the basement membrane underlying the corneal epithelium of the rhesus macaque , 1999, Cell and Tissue Research.

[19]  Finn Skou Pedersen,et al.  The use of combinatorial topographical libraries for the screening of enhanced osteogenic expression and mineralization. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[20]  Thomas J Webster,et al.  Nano-structured polymers enhance bladder smooth muscle cell function. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[21]  D. Prockop,et al.  Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. , 2006, Cytotherapy.

[22]  Peng Wang,et al.  Enhancing osteogenic differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells by nanofibers. , 2009, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[23]  John Tomes,et al.  The Structure and Development of Bone , 1853, The American journal of dental science.

[24]  P. Bianco,et al.  Mesenchymal stem cells: revisiting history, concepts, and assays. , 2008, Cell stem cell.

[25]  Mauricio González,et al.  Cytoskeletal organization of human mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) changes during their osteogenic differentiation , 2004, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[26]  Kevin E. Healy,et al.  A novel method to fabricate bioabsorbable scaffolds , 1995 .

[27]  J. Folkman,et al.  Role of cell shape in growth control , 1978, Nature.

[28]  Cato T Laurencin,et al.  Electrospun nanofibrous structure: a novel scaffold for tissue engineering. , 2002, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[29]  Matt J. Kipper,et al.  Osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells on poly(epsilon-caprolactone) nanofiber scaffolds. , 2010, Acta biomaterialia.

[30]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  Julian H. George,et al.  Exploring and Engineering the Cell Surface Interface , 2005, Science.

[32]  C H Lee,et al.  Anatomically Shaped Tooth and Periodontal Regeneration by Cell Homing , 2010, Journal of dental research.