Well-posedness of a Cahn–Hilliard system modelling tumour growth with chemotaxis and active transport

We consider a diffuse interface model for tumour growth consisting of a Cahn–Hilliard equation with source terms coupled to a reaction–diffusion equation. The coupled system of partial differential equations models a tumour growing in the presence of a nutrient species and surrounded by healthy tissue. The model also takes into account transport mechanisms such as chemotaxis and active transport. We establish well-posedness results for the tumour model and a variant with a quasi-static nutrient. It will turn out that the presence of the source terms in the Cahn–Hilliard equation leads to new difficulties when one aims to derive a priori estimates. However, we are able to prove continuous dependence on initial and boundary data for the chemical potential and for the order parameter in strong norms.

[1]  Danielle Hilhorst,et al.  On a Cahn-Hilliard type phase field system related to tumor growth , 2014, 1401.5943.

[2]  Kellen Petersen August Real Analysis , 2009 .

[3]  Hao Wu,et al.  Long-time behavior for the Hele-Shaw-Cahn-Hilliard system , 2012, Asymptot. Anal..

[4]  Steven M. Wise,et al.  Analysis of a Darcy-Cahn-Hilliard Diffuse Interface Model for the Hele-Shaw Flow and Its Fully Discrete Finite Element Approximation , 2011, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[5]  Jack K. Hale,et al.  Infinite dimensional dynamical systems , 1983 .

[6]  Danielle Hilhorst,et al.  Formal asymptotic limit of a diffuse-interface tumor-growth model , 2015 .

[7]  Carl Graham Long‐time behavior , 2014 .

[8]  J. Sprekels,et al.  Asymptotic analyses and error estimates for a Cahn-Hilliard type phase field system modelling tumor growth , 2015, 1503.00927.

[9]  H. Alt Lineare Funktionalanalysis : eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung , 2002 .

[10]  R. Temam Infinite Dimensional Dynamical Systems in Mechanics and Physics Springer Verlag , 1993 .

[11]  Helen Byrne,et al.  Modelling Avascular Tumour Growth , 2003 .

[12]  Zhifei Zhang,et al.  Well-posedness of the Hele–Shaw–Cahn–Hilliard system , 2010, 1012.2944.

[13]  Harald Garcke,et al.  Analysis of a Cahn--Hilliard system with non-zero Dirichlet conditions modeling tumor growth with chemotaxis , 2016, 1604.00287.

[14]  Elisabetta Rocca,et al.  On a diffuse interface model of tumour growth , 2014, European Journal of Applied Mathematics.

[15]  Xiangrong Li,et al.  Nonlinear simulations of solid tumor growth using a mixture model: invasion and branching , 2009, Journal of mathematical biology.

[16]  Maurizio Grasselli,et al.  On the Cahn–Hilliard–Brinkman system , 2014, 1402.6195.

[17]  J. Goodman,et al.  Modeling pinchoff and reconnection in a Hele-Shaw cell. I. The models and their calibration , 2002 .

[18]  Edriss S. Titi,et al.  Analysis of a mixture model of tumor growth , 2012, European Journal of Applied Mathematics.

[19]  Songmu Zheng,et al.  Well-posedness and long-time behavior of a non-autonomous Cahn-Hilliard-Darcy system with mass source modeling tumor growth , 2014, 1409.0364.

[20]  J. Simon Compact sets in the spaceLp(O,T; B) , 1986 .

[21]  Harald Garcke,et al.  A Cahn–Hilliard–Darcy model for tumour growth with chemotaxis and active transport , 2015, 1508.00437.

[22]  P. Colli,et al.  Vanishing viscosities and error estimate for a Cahn-Hilliard type phase field system related to tumor growth , 2015, 1501.07057.

[23]  Jonathan Goodman,et al.  Modeling pinchoff and reconnection in a Hele-Shaw cell. II. Analysis and simulation in the nonlinear regime , 2002 .

[24]  Kristoffer G. van der Zee,et al.  Numerical simulation of a thermodynamically consistent four‐species tumor growth model , 2012, International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering.