The spread of information, opinions, preferences, and behavior across social media is a crucial feature of the current functioning of our economy, politics, and culture. One of the emerging channels for spreading social collective action and funding of novelty in all these domains is Crowdfunding on various platforms such as Kickstarter, Indiegogo, Sellaband, and may others. The exact spreading mechanism of this collective action is not well-understood. The general belief is that virality plays a crucial role. Namely, the common hypothesis is that the information or behavior propagates through individuals affecting one another, presumably, through the links connecting them in social networks. The aim of our study is to find out the actual spreading mechanism in one particular case: spread of financial support for individual Kickstarter campaigns. To our surprise, our studies show that “virality” plays here only a minor role. We used this result to construct a simple behavior-grounded stochastic predictor of the success of Kickstarter campaigns which is not based on the viral mechanism. The crucial feature of the model underlying the prediction algorithm is that the success of a campaign depends less on the backers influencing one another (“virality”) but rather on the campaign appealing to a particular class of high-pledge backers. This appeal is usually revealed at the very beginning of the campaign and it is an excellent success predictor. The case of Kickstarter is consistent with a recently proposed generic hypothesis that popularity in social media arises more from independent responses by individuals belonging to a large homophily class rather than from percolation, self-exciting processes, and other cooperative mechanisms resulting from mutual influence between individuals. Thus, the very concept of “virality”, which implies contagion between participating individuals, plays only a minor role in the success mechanism proposed hereby. A more appropriate term for the mechanism underlying the social success in our model could be “social appeal” or “social fitness”.
[1]
Michael Golosovsky,et al.
The Transition Towards Immortality: Non-linear Autocatalytic Growth of Citations to Scientific Papers
,
2013,
ArXiv.
[2]
Wai-Tat Fu,et al.
Emerging Dynamics in Crowdfunding Campaigns
,
2014,
SBP.
[3]
S. Solomon,et al.
A microscopic model of the stock market: Cycles, booms, and crashes
,
1994
.
[4]
H. Barger.
The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money
,
1936,
Nature.
[5]
Jin-Wook Chung,et al.
A Long-Term Study of a Crowdfunding Platform: Predicting Project Success and Fundraising Amount
,
2015,
HT.
[6]
Calvin Qiu.
Issues in Crowdfunding: Theoretical and Empirical Investigation on Kickstarter
,
2013
.
[7]
J. Keynes,et al.
The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money.
,
1936
.
[8]
Eric Gilbert,et al.
The language that gets people to give: phrases that predict success on kickstarter
,
2014,
CSCW.
[9]
Kevin Chen,et al.
KickPredict : Predicting Kickstarter Success
,
2013
.
[10]
Sorin Solomon,et al.
Power laws of wealth, market order volumes and market returns
,
2001
.
[11]
Elizabeth Gerber,et al.
Crowdfunding support tools: predicting success & failure
,
2013,
CHI Extended Abstracts.
[12]
Sean J. Taylor,et al.
Social Influence Bias: A Randomized Experiment
,
2013,
Science.
[13]
M. Levy,et al.
POWER LAWS ARE LOGARITHMIC BOLTZMANN LAWS
,
1996,
adap-org/9607001.
[14]
Vincent Etter,et al.
Launch hard or go home!: predicting the success of kickstarter campaigns
,
2013,
COSN '13.
[15]
B. Bayus,et al.
A Review of Crowdfunding Research and Findings
,
2015
.
[16]
S. Solomon,et al.
Social percolation models
,
1999,
adap-org/9909001.