Predicting the dynamics of antiviral cytotoxic T‐cell memory in response to different stimuli: Cell population structure and protective function

This paper examines the numerical and functional consequences of various stimuli on antiviral CD8+ T‐cell memory using a mathematical model. The model is based upon biological evidence from the murine model of infection with lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) that the phenotype of immunological memory represents low‐level responses driven by various stimuli, and the memory CTL population is partitioned between resting, cycling and effector cells. These subpopulations differ in their lifespan, their potential to mediate antiviral protection and in the stimuli needed for their maintenance. Three types of maintenance stimuli are examined: non‐antigen‐specific (bystander) stimulation, persisting antigen stimulation and reinfection‐mediated stimulation. The modelling predicts that: (i) stable persistence of CTL memory requires the presence of either bystander or antigen‐specific stimulation above a certain threshold depending on the sensitivity of memory CTL to stimulation and their life‐span; (ii) a relatively low level of stimuli (approximately 104 fold less on a per CTL basis compared to acute infection) is needed to stabilize the expanded memory CTL population; (iii) the presence of CTL subsets in the memory pool of different activation states and lifespans ensures the robustness of memory persistence in the face of temporal variation in the low‐level stimuli and; (iv) an ‘optimal’ population structure of the memory CTL pool, in terms of immediate protection, requires the presence of both activated cycling and effector CTL. For this, persisting antigen alone or synergistically with bystander signals provide the appropriate stimulation, so that the stimuli equivalent to approximately 30 p.f.u. of LCMV in the spleen are sufficient to maintain approximately 105–106 specific CTL in the memory pool. These observations are relevant both to our understanding of natural protective immunity and to vaccine design.

[1]  Martine Tomkowiak,et al.  Resting Memory CD8+ T Cells are Hyperreactive to Antigenic Challenge In Vitro , 1996, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[2]  C. Bunce,et al.  CD4+ T-cell memory, CD45R subsets and the persistence of antigen--a unifying concept. , 1998, Immunology today.

[3]  J. Altman,et al.  Counting antigen-specific CD8 T cells: a reevaluation of bystander activation during viral infection. , 1998, Immunity.

[4]  D. Gray Viral immunity: Interferons jog old T-cell memories , 1996, Current Biology.

[5]  L. Bradley,et al.  The generation and maintenance of memory T and B cells. , 1999, Immunology today.

[6]  R. Welsh,et al.  Cytolytically active memory CTL present in lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus-immune mice after clearance of virus infection. , 1997, Journal of immunology.

[7]  J. Christensen,et al.  Virus-induced non-specific signals cause cell cycle progression of primed CD8(+) T cells but do not induce cell differentiation. , 1999, International immunology.

[8]  M. Nowak,et al.  Population Dynamics of Immune Responses to Persistent Viruses , 1996, Science.

[9]  B. Rocha,et al.  Lymphocyte lifespans: homeostasis, selection and competition. , 1993, Immunology today.

[10]  P. Doherty,et al.  The new numerology of immunity mediated by virus-specific CD8(+) T cells. , 1998, Current opinion in microbiology.

[11]  A. McLean,et al.  Modelling T cell memory. , 1994, Journal of theoretical biology.

[12]  M. Bachmann,et al.  Distinct kinetics of cytokine production and cytolysis in effector and memory T cells after viral infection , 1999, European journal of immunology.

[13]  S Oehen,et al.  Differentiation of naive CTL to effector and memory CTL: correlation of effector function with phenotype and cell division. , 1998, Journal of immunology.

[14]  R. Zinkernagel,et al.  Immunological Memory , 2006 .

[15]  A. Lanzavecchia,et al.  The duration of antigenic stimulation determines the fate of naive and effector T cells. , 1998, Immunity.

[16]  A. Lanzavecchia,et al.  Developmental Regulation of Lck Targeting to the CD8 Coreceptor Controls Signaling in Naive and Memory T Cells , 1999, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[17]  P. Klenerman,et al.  A functional and kinetic comparison of antiviral effector and memory cytotoxic T lymphocyte populations in vivo and in vitro , 1997, European journal of immunology.

[18]  R. Zinkernagel,et al.  Induction and Exhaustion of Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Virus–specific Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes Visualized Using Soluble Tetrameric Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I–Peptide Complexes , 1998, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[19]  M. Bevan,et al.  Low-affinity ligands for the TCR drive proliferation of mature CD8+ T cells in lymphopenic hosts. , 1999, Immunity.

[20]  G. Bocharov,et al.  Modelling the dynamics of LCMV infection in mice: conventional and exhaustive CTL responses. , 1998, Journal of theoretical biology.

[21]  David Gray,et al.  Immunological Memory and Protective Immunity: Understanding Their Relation , 1996, Science.

[22]  H. von Boehmer,et al.  On the cellular basis of immunological T cell memory. , 1995, Immunity.

[23]  J. Altman,et al.  Functionally Heterogeneous CD8+ T-Cell Memory Is Induced by Sendai Virus Infection of Mice , 1999, Journal of Virology.

[24]  H. Pircher,et al.  On T Cell Memory: Arguments for Antigen Dependence , 1996, Immunological reviews.

[25]  Paul C. Rogers,et al.  From Naive to Memory T Cells , 1996, Immunological reviews.

[26]  J. Sprent,et al.  Lymphocyte life-span and memory. , 1994, Science.

[27]  R. Welsh,et al.  In vivo state of antiviral CTL precursors. Characterization of a cycling cell population containing CTL precursors in immune mice. , 1995, Journal of immunology.

[28]  R. Zinkernagel,et al.  Bystander Activation of Cytotoxic T Cells: Studies on the Mechanism and Evaluation of In Vivo Significance in a Transgenic Mouse Model , 1997, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[29]  Alessandro Sette,et al.  Conserved T Cell Receptor Repertoire in Primary and Memory CD8 T Cell Responses to an Acute Viral Infection , 1998, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[30]  R M Zinkernagel,et al.  The impact of variation in the number of CD8(+) T-cell precursors on the outcome of virus infection. , 1998, Cellular immunology.

[31]  H. Pircher,et al.  Visualization, characterization, and turnover of CD8+ memory T cells in virus-infected hosts , 1996, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[32]  H. Eisen,et al.  Functional differences between memory and naive CD8 T cells. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  H. Pircher,et al.  Effector T‐Cell Induction and T‐Cell Memory versus Peripheral Deletion of T Cells , 1993, Immunological reviews.

[34]  P. Klenerman,et al.  A comparison of T cell memory against the same antigen induced by virus versus intracellular bacteria. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  J. Sprent,et al.  Stimulation of naive and memory T cells by cytokines , 1999, Immunological reviews.

[36]  A. Müllbacher The long-term maintenance of cytotoxic T cell memory does not require persistence of antigen , 1994, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[37]  F. Lemonnier,et al.  Differential requirements for survival and proliferation of CD8 naïve or memory T cells. , 1997, Science.

[38]  Christine Zimmermann,et al.  Kinetics of the response of naive and memory CD8 T cells to antigen: similarities and differences , 1999, European journal of immunology.

[39]  J. Sprent,et al.  Potent and selective stimulation of memory-phenotype CD8+ T cells in vivo by IL-15. , 1998, Immunity.

[40]  M. Davis,et al.  A kinetic basis for T cell receptor repertoire selection during an immune response. , 1999, Immunity.

[41]  F. Sallusto,et al.  Two subsets of memory T lymphocytes with distinct homing potentials and effector functions , 1999, Nature.

[42]  P. Klenerman,et al.  Persistence of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus at very low levels in immune mice. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  J. Kapp,et al.  Antigen Is Required for the Activation of Effector Activities, whereas Interleukin 2 Is Required for the Maintenance of Memory in Ovalbumin-specific, CD8+ Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes , 1998, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[44]  P. Klenerman,et al.  A non-retroviral RNA virus persists in DNA form , 1997, Nature.

[45]  P. Doherty,et al.  Establishment and Persistence of Virus‐Specific CD4+ and CD8+ T Cell Memory , 1996, Immunological reviews.

[46]  A S Perelson,et al.  Towards a general function describing T cell proliferation. , 1995, Journal of theoretical biology.