Robustness Analysis of Spatial Time-Frequency Distributions Based on the Influence Function

Standard spatial time-frequency distribution (STFD) estimators, derived based on the Gaussian noise assumption, are known to have poor performance in the case of impulsive noise. Recently, different STFD estimators have been proposed, which, based on simulations, are claimed to be robust. In this paper, we provide an influence function robustness analysis of STFD estimators. We derive the influence functions for the asymptotic and for the finite-sample case and study robustness of the standard, as well as for some recently proposed robust STFD estimators. The empirical influence function gives practitioners a simple way to pre-select STFD estimators for their scenario. Our analysis confirms that, unlike for the standard estimator, the proposed robust estimators yield a bounded influence function and are robust over a broad class of distributions. Future research on STFD estimation will allow for the design of robust and efficient estimators based on the influence function.

[1]  Braham Barkat,et al.  Analysis of polynomial FM signals corrupted by heavy-tailed noise , 2004, Signal Process..

[2]  Abdelhak M. Zoubir,et al.  Robust spatial time-frequency distribution matrix estimation with application to direction-of-arrival estimation , 2011, Signal Process..

[3]  Cornel Ioana,et al.  Time-frequency analysis of multipath doppler signatures of maneuvering targets , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[4]  Joerg F. Hipp,et al.  Time-Frequency Analysis , 2014, Encyclopedia of Computational Neuroscience.

[5]  Michael Muma,et al.  Robust Estimation in Signal Processing: A Tutorial-Style Treatment of Fundamental Concepts , 2012, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[6]  Moeness G. Amin,et al.  Maximum-likelihood methods for array processing based on time-frequency distributions , 1999, Optics & Photonics.

[7]  Yimin Zhang,et al.  Subspace analysis of spatial time-frequency distribution matrices , 2001, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[8]  E. Ollila,et al.  Influence functions for array covariance matrix estimators , 2004, IEEE Workshop on Statistical Signal Processing, 2003.

[9]  Igor Djurovic,et al.  Robust L-estimation based forms of signal transforms and time-frequency representations , 2003, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[10]  Yuri I. Abramovich,et al.  Impulsive Noise Mitigation in Spatial and Temporal Domains for Surface-Wave Over-the-Horizon Radar , 1999 .

[11]  Braham Himed,et al.  Joint DOD/DOA estimation in MIMO radar exploiting time-frequency signal representations , 2012, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[12]  Abdelhak M. Zoubir,et al.  Robust direction-of-arrival estimation for FM sources in the presence of impulsive noise , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[13]  Visa Koivunen,et al.  Influence Function and Asymptotic Efficiency of Scatter Matrix Based Array Processors: Case MVDR Beamformer , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[14]  David Middleton,et al.  Non-Gaussian Noise Models in Signal Processing for Telecommunications: New Methods and Results for Class A and Class B Noise Models , 1999, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[15]  Abdelhak M. Zoubir,et al.  Blind Source Separation in the Time-Frequency Domain Based on Multiple Hypothesis Testing , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[16]  Abdelhak M. Zoubir,et al.  Blind separation of nonstationary sources , 2004, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[17]  Abdelhak M. Zoubir,et al.  Direction-of-arrival estimation of FM sources based on robust spatial time-frequency distribution matrices , 2011, 2011 IEEE Statistical Signal Processing Workshop (SSP).

[18]  Yuexian Zou,et al.  A Novel Multiple Sparse Source Localization Using Triangular Pyramid Microphone Array , 2012, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[19]  F. Hampel The Influence Curve and Its Role in Robust Estimation , 1974 .

[20]  Yimin Zhang,et al.  Direction Finding Based on Spatial Time-Frequency Distribution Matrices , 2000, Digit. Signal Process..

[21]  Abdelhak M. Zoubir,et al.  Morphological image processing for FM source detection and localization , 2009, Signal Process..

[22]  Abdelhak M. Zoubir,et al.  Parameter Estimation for Locally Linear FM Signals Using a Time-Frequency Hough Transform , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[23]  Irena Orovic,et al.  Robust Time-Frequency Distributions with Complex-Lag Argument , 2010, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[24]  Boualem Boashash,et al.  Time-Frequency Signal Analysis and Processing: A Comprehensive Reference , 2015 .

[25]  Yimin Zhang,et al.  MIMO radar for direction finding with exploitation of time-frequency representations , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[26]  Scott Rickard,et al.  Blind separation of speech mixtures via time-frequency masking , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[27]  Messaoud Benidir,et al.  Robust polynomial Wigner-Ville distribution for the analysis of polynomial phase signals in /spl alpha/-stable noise , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[28]  Moeness G. Amin,et al.  Blind source separation based on time-frequency signal representations , 1998, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[29]  Yimin Zhang,et al.  Spatial averaging of time-frequency distributions for signal recovery in uniform linear arrays , 2000, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[30]  Michael Muma,et al.  Robust Estimation in Signal Processing , 2012 .

[31]  Abdelhak M. Zoubir,et al.  Bootstrap modeling of a class of nonstationary signals , 2000, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[32]  Justinian Rosca,et al.  Particle filter based DOA estimation for multiple source tracking (MUST) , 2011, 2011 Conference Record of the Forty Fifth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (ASILOMAR).

[33]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Measurements and simulation of radio frequency impulsive noise in hospitals and clinics , 1997, 1997 IEEE 47th Vehicular Technology Conference. Technology in Motion.