Analysis of Parameters for Smoothing Electrocardiographic Signals

The article is devoted to the consideration of the features of smoothing of ECG signal against the background of electromyographic distortions of various magnitude. The main goal of the research is comparative analysis of various options for the implementation of smoothing of an ECG signal contaminated by myographic interference in order to determine the optimal approach in terms of minimizing biosignal distortions and measurement errors of its amplitude-time characteristics. To obtain quantitative characteristics of the effectiveness of various methods for smoothing of the ECG signal, an approach was used based on simulation models of the ECG signal and distortions. A criterion for choosing the optimal parameters for ECG signal smoothing based on minimizing the errors in determining the durations of RR-intervals and distortions of the ECG signal was proposed. Various options for smoothing filters are considered: low-pass filter, multiscale wavelet transform, Savitzky–Golay filter, moving average filter. The optimal parameters for each type of filter are determined in terms of minimizing the distortion of the ECG signal and the measurement error of the durations of RR-intervals. The dependences of the change in the measurement error of the durations of RR-intervals on the signal-to-noise ratio, the dependences of the change in the signal distortion coefficient on the signal-to-noise ratio, and the plots of processing the noisy fragment of ECG signal by various types of filters are presented. Studies have shown that multiscale wavelet transforms of ECG signal with myographic interference is the optimal method for processing an ECG signal, providing minimal measurement errors of RR-intervals with minimal distortion of the ECG signal.

[1]  Alberto J. Palma,et al.  Efficient wavelet-based ECG processing for single-lead FHR extraction , 2013, Digit. Signal Process..

[2]  A. Ruha,et al.  A real-time microprocessor QRS detector system with a 1-ms timing accuracy for the measurement of ambulatory HRV , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  David L. Donoho,et al.  De-noising by soft-thresholding , 1995, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[4]  G. Breithardt,et al.  Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. , 1996 .

[5]  P. Stein,et al.  Heart Rate Variability: Measurement and Clinical Utility , 2005, Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc.

[6]  Patrick E. McSharry,et al.  A dynamical model for generating synthetic electrocardiogram signals , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  Patrick Gaydecki,et al.  The use of the Hilbert transform in ECG signal analysis , 2001, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[8]  H. B. Riley,et al.  Performance Study of Different Denoising Methods for ECG Signals , 2014, EUSPN/ICTH.

[9]  M. Sabarimalai Manikandan,et al.  A Review of Signal Processing Techniques for Electrocardiogram Signal Quality Assessment , 2018, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  Sabine Van Huffel,et al.  Artefact detection and quality assessment of ambulatory ECG signals , 2019, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[11]  Santanu Sahoo,et al.  Multiresolution wavelet transform based feature extraction and ECG classification to detect cardiac abnormalities , 2017 .

[12]  Pablo Laguna,et al.  Computational techniques for ECG analysis and interpretation in light of their contribution to medical advances , 2018, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.