What makes "the System" tick? - Explaining Individuals' Adaptation Behavior towards Effective Use in Enterprise System Implementations

Over the last three decades, research on adoption, implementation, and use of information technology in organizations such as technology acceptance has undoubtedly provided for valuable and important insights. However, there is still a lack of understanding of users’ responses to new IT, their adaptation behaviors and associated outcomes such as effective use in organizations. With a critical realist case study and new conceptualization of individuals’ adaptation behavior, we studied an Enterprise System (ES) implementation in work systems of a financial services provider. We found evidence for four generic adaptation modes as response to the ES implementation that are based on mechanisms of exploration or exploitation of knowledge, communication and structures of the ES. These modes can be instantiated differently by each individual, leading to different adaptation patterns that drive effective use and work system assimilation and thus can influence benefits from ES.

[1]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance , 1995, MIS Q..

[2]  Peter B. Seddon,et al.  A Multi-Project Model of Key Factors Affecting Organizational Benefits from Enterprise Systems , 2010, MIS Q..

[3]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Explaining information systems change: a punctuated socio-technical change model , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Understanding Organization-Enterprise System Fit: A Path to Theorizing the Information Technology Artifact , 2010, MIS Q..

[5]  Ray J. Paul,et al.  Challenges to information systems: time to change , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  Making Sense of Technology Trends in the Information Technology Landscape: A Design Science Approach , 2008, MIS Q..

[7]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory : strategies for qualitativeresearch [Glaser, 1968] , 1968 .

[8]  Rajiv Kohli,et al.  Measuring Information Technology Payoff: A Meta - Analysis of Structural Variables in Firm - Level Empirical Research , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[9]  Michel Avital,et al.  Designing interviews to generate rich data for information systems research , 2011, Inf. Organ..

[10]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Toward a process-based view of information technology acceptance , 2014, J. Inf. Technol..

[11]  Yutaka Yamauchi,et al.  Local assimilation of an enterprise system: Situated learning by means of familiarity pockets , 2010, Inf. Organ..

[12]  Paul Morton.  Using Critical Realism to Explain Strategic Information Systems Planning , 2006 .

[13]  Ron Weber,et al.  On the deep structure of information systems , 1995, Inf. Syst. J..

[14]  Qing Hu,et al.  How does organisational absorptive capacity matter in the assimilation of enterprise information systems? , 2013, Inf. Syst. J..

[15]  F KemererChris,et al.  The Assimilation of Software Process Innovations , 1997 .

[16]  Sean Xin Xu,et al.  Extracting Business Value from IT: A Sensemaking Perspective of Post-Adoptive Use , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[17]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Quo vadis TAM? , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  The future of diffusion research , 2001, DATB.

[19]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Measuring information systems success: models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[20]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[21]  M. Markus,et al.  The Enterprise System Experience— From Adoption to Success , 2000 .

[22]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Understanding enterprise systems-enabled integration , 2005, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Philip Raeth,et al.  What you see is what you get? - A comparison of theoretical lenses to study technology in organizations , 2012, ICIS.

[24]  Nils Urbach,et al.  The Why, What and How of Theories in Information Systems Research , 2013 .

[25]  Marguerite Schneider,et al.  Phases of the Adoption of Innovation in Organizations: Effects of Environment, Organization and Top Managers , 2006 .

[26]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[27]  M. Hannan,et al.  Structural Inertia and Organizational Change , 1984 .

[28]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Technological Embeddedness and Organizational Change , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[29]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[30]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  The qualitative interview in IS research: Examining the craft , 2007, Inf. Organ..

[31]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[32]  Andrew Burton-Jones,et al.  From Use to Effective Use: A Representation Theory Perspective , 2013, Inf. Syst. Res..

[33]  Sia Siew Kien,et al.  An assessment of package–organisation misalignment: institutional and ontological structures , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[34]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  Information Technology Implementers' Responses to User Resistance: Nature and Effects , 2012, MIS Q..

[35]  Piergiorgio Corbetta.  The Qualitative Interview , 2003 .

[36]  Ryad Titah,et al.  Information System Use - Related Activity: An Expanded Behavioral Conceptualization of Individual-Level Information System Use , 2007, Inf. Syst. Res..

[37]  Jing Wu,et al.  The ongoing quest for the IT artifact: Looking back, moving forward , 2013, J. Inf. Technol..

[38]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[39]  Chris F. Kemerer,et al.  The assimilation of software process innovations: an organizational learning perspective , 1997 .

[40]  Christina Soh,et al.  How IT Creates Business Value: A Process Theory Synthesis , 1995, ICIS.

[41]  R. Zmud,et al.  Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach , 1990 .

[42]  Qing Hu,et al.  Assimilation of Enterprise Systems: The Effect of Institutional Pressures and the Mediating Role of Top Management , 2007, MIS Q..

[43]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Enterprise System Implementation and Employee Job Performance: Understanding the Role of Advice Networks , 2014, MIS Q..

[44]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[45]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Reconceptualizing System Usage: An Approach and Empirical Test , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[46]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  Investigating user resistance to information systems implementation: a status quo bias perspective , 2009 .

[47]  V. Bakthavatsalam,et al.  Windows of opportunity , 2001 .

[48]  Steven L. Alter.  Work System Theory: Overview of Core Concepts, Extensions, and Challenges for the Future , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[49]  Ning Nan,et al.  Capturing Bottom-Up Information Technology Use Processes: A Complex Adaptive Systems Model , 2011, MIS Q..

[50]  Kelly J. Fadel.  User Adaptation and Infusion of Information Systems , 2012, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[51]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[52]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  Windows of Opportunity: Temporal Patterns of Technological Adaptation in Organizations , 2011 .

[53]  Donald E. Wynn,et al.  Principles for Conducting Critical Realist Case Study Research in Information Systems , 2012, MIS Q..

[54]  Heshan Sun,et al.  Understanding User Revisions When Using Information Systems Features: Adaptive System Use and Triggers , 2012, MIS Q..

[55]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  A Comprehensive Conceptualization of Post-Adoptive Behaviors Associated with Information Technology Enabled Work Systems , 2005, MIS Q..

[56]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  A Multilevel Model of Resistance to Information Technology Implementation , 2005, MIS Q..

[57]  Erling S. Andersen.  Toward a Project Management Theory for Renewal Projects , 2006 .

[58]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Model of Acceptance with Peer Support: A Social Network Perspective to Understand Employees' System Use , 2009, MIS Q..

[59]  Annette Mills,et al.  Understanding and addressing user resistance to IS implementation in a lean context , 2011, ECIS.

[60]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[61]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Implementation, Innovation, and Related Themes Over The Years In Information Systems Research , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[62]  Richard A. Kemmerer,et al.  State Transition Analysis: A Rule-Based Intrusion Detection Approach , 1995, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[63]  Peter B. Seddon,et al.  Assessing and managing the benefits of enterprise systems: the business manager's perspective , 2002, Inf. Syst. J..

[64]  E. Brynjolfsson,et al.  Beyond Computation: Information Technology, Organizational Transformation and Business Performance , 2000 .

[65]  SunHeshan.  Understanding user revisions when using information system features , 2012 .

[66]  Pearl Brereton,et al.  Does the technology acceptance model predict actual use? A systematic literature review , 2010, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[67]  Blake Ives,et al.  ERP Implementation Gone Terribly Wrong: The Case of Natural Springs , 2011, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[68]  Shan Ling Pan,et al.  Enterprise Systems Use: Towards a Structurational Analysis of Enterprise Systems Induced Organizational Transformation , 2007, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[69]  Russell L. Purvis,et al.  The Assimilation of Knowledge Platforms in Organizations: An Empirical Investigation , 2001 .

[70]  D. Leonard.  Implementation as Mutual Adaptation of Technology and Organization , 2011 .

[71]  Icek Ajzen,et al.  From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior , 1985 .

[72]  John Mingers,et al.  Real-izing information systems: critical realism as an underpinning philosophy for information systems , 2004, Inf. Organ..

[73]  Anne Beaudry,et al.  Understanding User Responses to Information Technology: A Coping Model of User Adaption , 2005, MIS Q..

[74]  Matthew R. Jones,et al.  Giddens's Structuration Theory and Information Systems Research , 2008, MIS Q..

[75]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[76]  PinsonneaultAlain,et al.  Understanding user responses to information technology , 2005 .

[77]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Generalizing Generalizability in Information Systems Research , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[78]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Adoption of information systems innovations by individuals: A study of processes involving contextual, adopter, and influencer actions , 2008, Inf. Organ..

[79]  Richard J. Boland,et al.  Knowledge management technology and the reproduction of knowledge work practices , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[80]  Martha S. Feldman,et al.  Organizational Routines as a Unit of Analysis , 2005 .

[81]  W ZmudRobert,et al.  Information Technology Implementation Research , 1990 .

[82]  John Ingham,et al.  Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[83]  W. Orlikowski.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000 .

[84]  RivardSuzanne,et al.  Information technology implementers' responses to user resistance , 2012 .

[85]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Understanding Post-Adoptive Usage Behaviors: A Two-Dimensional View , 2006 .

[86]  Ron Weber,et al.  Ontological foundations of information systems , 1997 .

[87]  M. Markus,et al.  Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research , 1988 .

[88]  Pankaj Setia,et al.  The Effects of the Assimilation and Use of IT Applications on Financial Performance in Healthcare Organizations , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[89]  Alistair Mutch,et al.  Actors and Networks or Agents and Structures: Towards a Realist View of Information Systems , 2002 .

[90]  A. Langley.  Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[91]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[92]  NanNing.  Capturing bottom-up information technology use processes , 2011 .

[93]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Opening the black box of system usage: user adaptation to disruptive IT , 2011, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[94]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[95]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..