Dynamic whole-body PET parametric imaging: I. Concept, acquisition protocol optimization and clinical application

Static whole-body PET/CT, employing the standardized uptake value (SUV), is considered the standard clinical approach to diagnosis and treatment response monitoring for a wide range of oncologic malignancies. Alternative PET protocols involving dynamic acquisition of temporal images have been implemented in the research setting, allowing quantification of tracer dynamics, an important capability for tumor characterization and treatment response monitoring. Nonetheless, dynamic protocols have been confined to single-bed-coverage limiting the axial field-of-view to ~15-20 cm, and have not been translated to the routine clinical context of whole-body PET imaging for the inspection of disseminated disease. Here, we pursue a transition to dynamic whole-body PET parametric imaging, by presenting, within a unified framework, clinically feasible multi-bed dynamic PET acquisition protocols and parametric imaging methods. We investigate solutions to address the challenges of: (i) long acquisitions, (ii) small number of dynamic frames per bed, and (iii) non-invasive quantification of kinetics in the plasma. In the present study, a novel dynamic (4D) whole-body PET acquisition protocol of ~45 min total length is presented, composed of (i) an initial 6 min dynamic PET scan (24 frames) over the heart, followed by (ii) a sequence of multi-pass multi-bed PET scans (six passes × seven bed positions, each scanned for 45 s). Standard Patlak linear graphical analysis modeling was employed, coupled with image-derived plasma input function measurements. Ordinary least squares Patlak estimation was used as the baseline regression method to quantify the physiological parameters of tracer uptake rate Ki and total blood distribution volume V on an individual voxel basis. Extensive Monte Carlo simulation studies, using a wide set of published kinetic FDG parameters and GATE and XCAT platforms, were conducted to optimize the acquisition protocol from a range of ten different clinically acceptable sampling schedules examined. The framework was also applied to six FDG PET patient studies, demonstrating clinical feasibility. Both simulated and clinical results indicated enhanced contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) for Ki images in tumor regions with notable background FDG concentration, such as the liver, where SUV performed relatively poorly. Overall, the proposed framework enables enhanced quantification of physiological parameters across the whole body. In addition, the total acquisition length can be reduced from 45 to ~35 min and still achieve improved or equivalent CNR compared to SUV, provided the true Ki contrast is sufficiently high. In the follow-up companion paper, a set of advanced linear regression schemes is presented to particularly address the presence of noise, and attempt to achieve a better trade-off between the mean-squared error and the CNR metrics, resulting in enhanced task-based imaging.

[1]  Ludwig G Strauss,et al.  Quantitative, dynamic 18F-FDG-PET for the evaluation of soft tissue sarcomas: relation to differential diagnosis, tumor grading and prediction of prognosis. , 2009, Hellenic journal of nuclear medicine.

[2]  A. Rahmim,et al.  Direct 4D reconstruction of parametric images incorporating anato-functional joint entropy , 2010, 2008 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[3]  W H Wong,et al.  A clinically practical method to acquire parametric images of unidirectional metabolic rates and blood spaces. , 1994, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  B. Rosen,et al.  PET and MR Imaging: The Odd Couple or a Match Made in Heaven? , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[5]  T. Turkington,et al.  A systematic review of the factors affecting accuracy of SUV measurements. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  R L Wahl,et al.  Standardized uptake values of normal tissues at PET with 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose: variations with body weight and a method for correction. , 1993, Radiology.

[7]  Keigo Endo,et al.  Transport of 3-Fluoro-l-α-Methyl-Tyrosine by Tumor-Upregulated L-Type Amino Acid Transporter 1: A Cause of the Tumor Uptake in PET , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  M. Seemann,et al.  Whole-Body PET/MRI: The Future in Oncological Imaging , 2005, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[9]  I. Bradbury,et al.  Overview of the clinical effectiveness of positron emission tomography imaging in selected cancers. , 2007, Health technology assessment.

[10]  Uwe Haberkorn,et al.  Quantitative assessment of SSTR2 expression in patients with non-small cell lung cancer using68Ga-DOTATOC PET and comparison with18F-FDG PET , 2006, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[11]  Cyrill Burger,et al.  Simplified quantification of FDG metabolism in tumors using the autoradiographic method is less dependent on the acquisition time than SUV. , 2011, Nuclear medicine and biology.

[12]  Scott David Wollenweber,et al.  Parameterization of a model-based 3-D PET scatter correction , 2002 .

[13]  Konstantina S. Nikita,et al.  A methodology for optimizing the acquisition time of a clinical PET scan using GATE , 2009, 2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[14]  S Stute,et al.  GATE V6: a major enhancement of the GATE simulation platform enabling modelling of CT and radiotherapy , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  Hiroshi Fukuda,et al.  Advantage of delayed whole-body FDG-PET imaging for tumour detection , 2001, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[16]  Guobao Wang,et al.  Acceleration of the direct reconstruction of linear parametric images using nested algorithms , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  M Schwaiger,et al.  Reproducibility of metabolic measurements in malignant tumors using FDG PET. , 1999, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  Ciprian Catana,et al.  Simultaneous PET-MRI: a new approach for functional and morphological imaging , 2008, Nature Medicine.

[19]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Noninvasive determination of local cerebral metabolic rate of glucose in man. , 1980, The American journal of physiology.

[20]  Sung-Cheng Huang,et al.  Anatomy of SUV , 2000 .

[21]  M E Phelps,et al.  Whole-body positron emission tomography: Part I. Methods and performance characteristics. , 1992, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[22]  Ralph A Bundschuh,et al.  Motion Artifacts in Oncological and Cardiac PET Imaging. , 2013, PET clinics.

[23]  Arman Rahmim,et al.  Towards parametric whole-body FDG PET/CT imaging: Potentials for enhanced tumor detectability , 2012 .

[24]  Yun Zhou,et al.  Quantitative whole-body parametric PET imaging incorporating a generalized Patlak model , 2013, 2013 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (2013 NSS/MIC).

[25]  J. Ollinger Model-based scatter correction for fully 3D PET. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[26]  Jiahe Tian,et al.  Kidney Modelling for FDG Excretion with PET , 2007, Int. J. Biomed. Imaging.

[27]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Partial Volume Correction Strategies in PET. , 2007, PET clinics.

[28]  B. Schölkopf,et al.  Towards quantitative PET/MRI: a review of MR-based attenuation correction techniques , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[29]  L M Hamberg,et al.  Simplified measurement of deoxyglucose utilization rate. , 1996, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[30]  Stephen L Bacharach,et al.  Simplified kinetic analysis of tumor 18F-FDG uptake: a dynamic approach. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[31]  R L Wahl,et al.  Enhanced FDG-PET tumor imaging with correlation-coefficient filtered influx-constant images. , 1996, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[32]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Four-Dimensional Image Reconstruction Strategies in Cardiac-Gated and Respiratory-Gated PET Imaging. , 2013, PET clinics.

[33]  R. Wahl,et al.  From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[34]  S. Nehmeh,et al.  Respiratory Motion Correction Strategies in Thoracic PET-CT Imaging. , 2013, PET clinics.

[35]  L M Hamberg,et al.  The dose uptake ratio as an index of glucose metabolism: useful parameter or oversimplification? , 1994, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[36]  G. Loudos,et al.  GATE simulations for small animal SPECT/PET using voxelized phantoms and rotating-head detectors , 2006, 2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[37]  Norihiro Sadato,et al.  Non-invasive estimation of the net influx constant using the standardized uptake value for quantification of FDG uptake of tumours , 1998, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[38]  Leyun Pan,et al.  Assessment of quantitative FDG PET data in primary colorectal tumours: which parameters are important with respect to tumour detection? , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[39]  Konstantina S. Nikita,et al.  Validation of a GATE model for the simulation of the Siemens biograph™ 6 PET scanner , 2007 .

[40]  S. Libutti,et al.  Comparison of SUV and Patlak slope for monitoring of cancer therapy using serial PET scans , 2002, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[41]  U Ruotsalainen,et al.  Carbon-11-methionine and PET is an effective method to image head and neck cancer. , 1992, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[42]  C Burger,et al.  Quantitative PET studies in pretreated melanoma patients: a comparison of 6-[18F]fluoro-L-dopa with 18F-FDG and (15)O-water using compartment and noncompartment analysis. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[43]  J. Keyes SUV: standard uptake or silly useless value? , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[44]  Arman Rahmim,et al.  Direct 4D whole-body PET/CT parametric image reconstruction: Concept and comparison vs. indirect parametric imaging , 2013 .

[45]  Osman Ratib,et al.  Impact of patient weight and emission scan duration on PET/CT image quality and lesion detectability. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[46]  S. T. Buckland,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap. , 1994 .

[47]  K. Thielemans,et al.  3D implementation of Scatter Estimation in 3D PET , 2006, 2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[48]  C. Patlak,et al.  Graphical Evaluation of Blood-to-Brain Transfer Constants from Multiple-Time Uptake Data. Generalizations , 1985, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[49]  Guobao Wang,et al.  MAXIMUM A POSTERIORI RECONSTRUCTION OF PATLAK PARAMETRIC IMAGE FROM SINOGRAMS IN DYNAMIC PET , 2008, 2007 4th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[50]  Arman Rahmim,et al.  Feasibility of parametric imaging in multi-bed dynamic human FDG PET , 2010 .

[51]  Stephan G Nekolla,et al.  Clinical Impact of Cardiac-Gated PET Imaging. , 2013, PET clinics.

[52]  M. Iatrou,et al.  A fully 3D iterative image reconstruction algorithm incorporating data corrections , 2004, IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004..

[53]  N. Gupta,et al.  Dependency of standardized uptake values of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose on body size: comparison of body surface area correction and lean body mass correction. , 1996, Nuclear medicine communications.

[54]  Yuji Nakamoto,et al.  PET/CT: artifacts caused by bowel motion , 2004, Nuclear medicine communications.

[55]  David W Townsend,et al.  Positron emission tomography/computed tomography. , 2008, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[56]  A. Alavi,et al.  Standardized uptake values of FDG: body surface area correction is preferable to body weight correction. , 1994, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[57]  Leyun Pan,et al.  Impact of Angiogenesis-Related Gene Expression on the Tracer Kinetics of 18F-FDG in Colorectal Tumors , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[58]  Abass Alavi,et al.  Whole-body FDG-PET imaging in the management of patients with cancer. , 2002, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[59]  D. Feng,et al.  Optimized sampling and parameter estimation for quantification in whole body PET , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[60]  M. Reivich,et al.  THE [14C]DEOXYGLUCOSE METHOD FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF LOCAL CEREBRAL GLUCOSE UTILIZATION: THEORY, PROCEDURE, AND NORMAL VALUES IN THE CONSCIOUS AND ANESTHETIZED ALBINO RAT 1 , 1977, Journal of neurochemistry.

[61]  T. J. Spinks,et al.  Quantitative accuracy in cardiac studies with the GE discovery RX PET/CT scanner , 2008, 2008 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[62]  D R Haynor,et al.  Resampling estimates of precision in emission tomography. , 1989, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[63]  I. Buvat,et al.  A review of partial volume correction techniques for emission tomography and their applications in neurology, cardiology and oncology , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[64]  W. Segars,et al.  4D XCAT phantom for multimodality imaging research. , 2010, Medical physics.

[65]  Quanzheng Li,et al.  Multi-bed-position dynamic imaging and kinetic analysis of 68Ga-NOTA-PRGD2 in lung cancer patients , 2012 .

[66]  I. Buvat,et al.  Partial-Volume Effect in PET Tumor Imaging* , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[67]  Cyrill Burger,et al.  Prognostic aspects of 18F-FDG PET kinetics in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma receiving FOLFOX chemotherapy. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[68]  Hiroshi Fukuda,et al.  Initial evaluation of dynamic human imaging using18F-FRP170 as a new PET tracer for imaging hypoxia , 2007, Annals of nuclear medicine.

[69]  Luigi Mansi,et al.  The quantification with FDG as seen by a physician. , 2013, Nuclear medicine and biology.

[70]  Heinz-Peter Schlemmer,et al.  PET/MRI: Paving the Way for the Next Generation of Clinical Multimodality Imaging Applications , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[71]  Kris Thielemans,et al.  Study of direct and indirect parametric estimation methods of linear models in dynamic positron emission tomography. , 2008, Medical physics.

[72]  Charles Laymon,et al.  PET imaging reveals distinctive roles for different regional adipose tissue depots in systemic glucose metabolism in nonobese humans. , 2012, American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism.

[73]  Arman Rahmim,et al.  Enhanced whole-body PET parametric imaging using hybrid regression and thresholding driven by kinetic correlations , 2012, 2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[74]  Martin A Lodge,et al.  Dynamic whole-body PET parametric imaging: II. Task-oriented statistical estimation , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[75]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Measuring PET scanner sensitivity: relating countrates to image signal-to-noise ratios using noise equivalents counts , 1990 .

[76]  Konstantina S. Nikita,et al.  Comparative evaluation of two commercial PET scanners, ECAT EXACT HR+ and Biograph 2, using GATE , 2006 .

[77]  R. Wahl,et al.  Germ cell tumor: differentiation of viable tumor, mature teratoma, and necrotic tissue with FDG PET and kinetic modeling. , 1999, Radiology.

[78]  C. Bohm,et al.  Correction for Scattered Radiation in a Ring Detector Positron Camera by Integral Transformation of the Projections , 1983, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[79]  Christian Windischberger,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging methodology , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[80]  C S Patlak,et al.  Graphical Evaluation of Blood-to-Brain Transfer Constants from Multiple-Time Uptake Data , 1983, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[81]  Yun Zhou,et al.  Multi-graphical analysis of dynamic PET , 2010, NeuroImage.

[82]  F. Castell,et al.  Quantitative techniques in 18FDG PET scanning in oncology , 2008, British Journal of Cancer.

[83]  C. Tsoumpas,et al.  STIR: software for tomographic image reconstruction release 2 , 2012, 2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[84]  Arman Rahmim,et al.  Dynamic Multi-Bed FDG PET imaging: Feasibility and optimization , 2011, 2011 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[85]  Y Yonekura,et al.  In vivo assessment of glucose metabolism in hepatocellular carcinoma with FDG-PET. , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.