Dynamic Social Influence Analysis through Time-Dependent Factor Graphs

Social influence, the phenomenon that the actions of a user can induce her/his friends to behave in a similar way, plays a key role in many (online) social systems. For example, a company wants to market a new product through the effect of ``word of mouth'' in the social network. It wishes to find and convince a small number of influential users to adopt the product, and the goal is to trigger a large cascade of further adoptions. Fundamentally, we need to answer the following question: how to quantify the influence between two users in a large social network? To address this question, we propose a pair wise factor graph (PFG) model to model the social influence in social networks. An efficient algorithm is designed to learn the model and make inference. We further propose a dynamic factor graph (DFG) model to incorporate the time information. Experimental results on three different genres of data sets show that the proposed approaches can efficiently infer the dynamic social influence. The results are applied to the influence maximization problem, which aims to find a small subset of nodes (users) in a social network that could maximize the spread of influence. Experiments show that the proposed approach can facilitate the application.

[1]  Jennifer Neville,et al.  Randomization tests for distinguishing social influence and homophily effects , 2010, WWW '10.

[2]  Wei Chen,et al.  Efficient influence maximization in social networks , 2009, KDD.

[3]  Matthew Richardson,et al.  Yes, there is a correlation: - from social networks to personal behavior on the web , 2008, WWW.

[4]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[5]  Matthew Richardson,et al.  Mining knowledge-sharing sites for viral marketing , 2002, KDD.

[6]  Brendan J. Frey,et al.  Factor graphs and the sum-product algorithm , 2001, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[7]  Radford M. Neal Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2007, Technometrics.

[8]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Latent Dirichlet Allocation , 2001, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[9]  Ravi Kumar,et al.  Influence and correlation in social networks , 2008, KDD.

[10]  Jimeng Sun,et al.  Social influence analysis in large-scale networks , 2009, KDD.

[11]  Wei Chen,et al.  Scalable influence maximization for prevalent viral marketing in large-scale social networks , 2010, KDD.

[12]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Inferring networks of diffusion and influence , 2010, KDD.

[13]  Matthew Richardson,et al.  Mining the network value of customers , 2001, KDD '01.

[14]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  Feedback effects between similarity and social influence in online communities , 2008, KDD.

[15]  Masahiro Kimura,et al.  Tractable Models for Information Diffusion in Social Networks , 2006, PKDD.

[16]  Laks V. S. Lakshmanan,et al.  Learning influence probabilities in social networks , 2010, WSDM '10.

[17]  Brendan J. Frey,et al.  Graphical Models for Machine Learning and Digital Communication , 1998 .