Introduction: Making Inclusion Work in Academia

This book is for inclusion and multiplicity in academia. To this end, it is against standardization. As academics in Western countries, we are being organized to conform to rigid standards of teaching and research. This book shows how we can meaningfully challenge such standardization through inclusive practices in our everyday work. We – the authors in this edited volume – present inclusive ideas and ways of interacting that have worked in different university contexts around the world. We share our personal experiences on working for inclusion, account for the relative success of our efforts and provide insights that may prove helpful for others, too. We care passionately about inclusion in academic work. For us, inclusion means bringing in new voices, themes and methods in teaching and research. Most often, inclusion refers in this book to incorporating considerations of gender and ethnicity in the ways in which curricula, courses and research projects are developed and run. By questioning established power relations, privileged knowledge and locally held truths regarding good and proper academic standards and practice, we have each in our own way sought to challenge the status quo. We have sought to make alternative understandings and practices visible. We are aware of current criticism of ‘positive scholarship’ (Fineman, 2006). We distance ourselves from this notion. As feminist organization and management scholars we have learned not to be naive. We are aware of unequal power relations and structures of domination that our work is embedded in. These relations and structures are woven into the fabric of our academic lives, even if we sometimes refer to particular experiences as positive. Also, our stories relate to relative success in changing everyday academic practices, not to great breakthroughs or unselfish service to community. In this way, we also distance ourselves from the notion of ‘engaged scholarship’, which has in recent years become a popular concept to describe meaningful academic work. Engaged scholarship can refer to admirable efforts to incorporate key stakeholders’ perspectives in the study of complex social problems

[1]  S. Nkomo,et al.  The Seductive Power of Academic Journal Rankings: Challenges of Searching for the Otherwise , 2009 .

[2]  L. Smircich,et al.  From the ‘Woman's Point of View’ Ten Years Later: Towards a Feminist Organization Studies , 2006 .

[3]  L. Graham The Power of Names , 2011 .

[4]  C. Kitzinger Doing Gender , 2009 .

[5]  N. Adler,et al.  When Knowledge Wins: Transcending the Sense and Nonsense of Academic Rankings , 2009 .

[6]  Keijo Räsänen,et al.  Anglo-American Forms of Management Education: A practice-theoretical perspective , 2007 .

[7]  Arthur P. Bochner,et al.  Autoethnography, Personal Narrative, Reflexivity: Researcher as Subject , 2000 .

[8]  J. Buzard On Auto-Ethnographic Authority , 2003 .

[9]  S. Clegg,et al.  The discourse of organisation studies: dissensus, politics and paradigms , 2003 .

[10]  S. Katila,et al.  Metamorphosis: From 'Nice Girls' to 'Nice Bitches': Resisting patriarchal articulations of professional identity. , 2002 .

[11]  L. Morley Organising Feminisms: The Micropolitics of the Academy , 1999 .

[12]  Linda Wedlin,et al.  The Role of Rankings in Codifying a Business School Template: Classifications, Diffusion and Mediated Isomorphism in Organizational Fields , 2007 .

[13]  Maureen A. Scully,et al.  Tempered Radicalism and the Politics of Ambivalence and Change , 2009 .

[14]  D. Haraway Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature , 1990 .

[15]  Janne Tienari,et al.  Hegemonic Academic Practices: Experiences of Publishing from the Periphery , 2008 .

[16]  David A. Harrison,et al.  On the Diversity of Diversity: Tidy Logic, Messier Realities , 2007 .

[17]  Mustafa Özbilgin From Journal Rankings to Making Sense of the World , 2009 .

[18]  M. A. Sagaria Reframing Gender Equality Initiatives as University Adaptation , 2007 .

[19]  C. Eschle Feminism without Borders: Decolonizing Theory, Practicing Solidarity , 2004 .

[20]  S. Fineman On Being Positive: Concerns and Counterpoints , 2006 .

[21]  L. Engwall The anatomy of management education , 2007 .

[22]  William H. Starbuck,et al.  How Much Better are the Most Prestigious Journals? The Statistics of Academic Publication , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[23]  Arthur P. Bochner,et al.  Analyzing Analytic Autoethnography , 2006 .

[24]  L. Anderson THE OPEN ROAD TO ETHNOGRAPHY'S FUTURE , 1999 .

[25]  Saija Katila,et al.  A Serious Researcher or Just Another Nice Girl?: Doing Gender in a Male‐Dominated Scientific Community , 1999 .

[26]  J. Kam Ring a Ring O' Roses: Quality Journals and Gamesmanship in Management Studies , 2007 .

[27]  M. Bell,et al.  Viewing Diversity Through Different Lenses: Avoiding a Few Blind Spots , 2007 .