Growth and competition between seedlings of an invasive plantation tree, Acacia mangium, and those of a native Borneo heath-forest species, Melastoma beccarianum

An introduced plantation tree species, Acacia mangium Willd., is becoming invasive in the Brunei region of Borneo. To examine its invasive potential, a greenhouse, additive series experiment (target–neighbour) involving seedlings of A. mangium and those of a common native heath-forest (kerangas), Melastoma beccarianum Cogn. was carried out under low and high light regimes in intra- and interspecific combinations over a 6-month period. Significant variations in growth parameters (other than biomass allocation patterns) existed amongst seedlings from different treatments. A major part of this variation in growth could be attributed to the main factors of target species, neighbour species, and competition (seedling density). For the growth variables examined, the target–species response was not consistent across light regimes. Under high light conditions, Acacia was the better competitor; the Lotka-Volterra competition coefficient effect of Melastoma on Acacia was lower (α=0.30) than the effect of Acacia on Melastoma (β=0.54). However, the reverse occurred under low light conditions with Melastoma gaining the upper hand (α=1.45 and β=0.44). These results show that light (and hence disturbance) can strongly influence the pattern and intensity of both intra- and interspecific competition between invasive and local flora species. Relatively intact forest is unlikely to be invaded by Acacia trees (as they are poor competitors under this scenario). On the other hand, the Acacia trees can easily invade disturbed forests, especially those prone to recurring drought and fire, and over time convert the habitats to nearly monospecific stands, as is presently being observed in Brunei.

[1]  A. Ares,et al.  Growth, biomass allocation and photosynthesis of invasive and native Hawaiian rainforest species , 1998, Oecologia.

[2]  F. Bazzaz,et al.  Interspecific Competition in Plants: How Well Do Current Methods Answer Fundamental Questions? , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[3]  D. Richardson,et al.  Commercially Important Trees as Invasive Aliens – Towards Spatially Explicit Risk Assessment at a National Scale , 2002, Biological Invasions.

[4]  A. Williams,et al.  A new index of interspecific competition for replacement and additive designs , 2001, Ecological Research.

[5]  R. Snaydon Replacement or additive designs for competition studies , 1991 .

[6]  Richard N. Mack,et al.  Predicting the identity and fate of plant invaders: emergent and emerging approaches. , 1996 .

[7]  D. Richardson Forestry Trees as Invasive Aliens , 1998 .

[8]  B. Hetrick,et al.  Mycorrhizal influence on intra- and interspecific neighbour interactions among co-occurring prairie grasses , 1993 .

[9]  R. Groves,et al.  Plant invasions of Australia: an overview. , 1986 .

[10]  A. Rebelo,et al.  Effects of dry heat on seed germination in selected indigenous and alien legume species in South Africa , 1988 .

[11]  B. Mccarthy,et al.  Competitive Ability of Alliaria petiolata (Garlic Mustard, Brassicaceae), an Invasive, Nonindigenous Forest Herb , 1999, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[12]  G. Goldstein,et al.  Responses to Light and Water Availability of Four Invasive Melastomataceae in the Hawaiian Islands , 2000, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[13]  R. Cowling,et al.  The effects of invasion by Acacia saligna on the guild structure and regeneration capabilities of South African fynbos shrublands. , 1997 .

[14]  Scott D. Wilson,et al.  The Influence of Initial Size on the Competitive Responses of Six Plant Species , 1995 .

[15]  J. Kaiser Stemming the Tide of Invading Species , 1999, Science.

[16]  William M. Schaffer,et al.  Plant strategies and the dynamics and structure of plant communities , 1989 .

[17]  K. Shrader-Frechette Non-Indigenous Species and Ecological Explanation , 2001 .

[18]  O. O. Osunkoya,et al.  Leaf properties and construction costs of common, co-occurring plant species of disturbed heath forest in Borneo , 2004 .

[19]  D. Richardson,et al.  The Economic Consequences of Alien Plant Invasions: Examples of Impacts and Approaches to Sustainable Management in South Africa , 2001 .

[20]  J. Connolly,et al.  Designs for greenhouse studies of interactions between plants , 1999 .

[21]  J. Hatfield Experiments in Ecology: Their Logical Design and Interpretation Using Analysis of Variance , 1998 .

[22]  Acclimation to a Change in Light Regime in Seedlings of Six Australian Rainforest Tree Species , 1991 .

[23]  D. Gordon Effects of invasive, non-indigenous plant species on ecosystem processes: lessons from Florida. , 1998 .

[24]  P. Jolliffe,et al.  Indices of plant competition , 2003 .

[25]  M. D. Wit,et al.  Conflicts of Interest in Environmental Management: Estimating the Costs and Benefits of a Tree Invasion , 2001, Biological Invasions.

[26]  R. Groves,et al.  Ecology of biological invasions. , 1986 .

[27]  P. Moyle,et al.  Fish Invasions in California: Do Abiotic Factors Determine Success? , 1996 .

[28]  R. N. Mack Cultivation Fosters Plant Naturalization by Reducing Environmental Stochasticity , 2004, Biological Invasions.

[29]  R. Freckleton,et al.  Predicting competition coefficients for plant mixtures: reciprocity, transitivity and correlations with life‐history traits , 2001 .

[30]  D. Gorchov,et al.  Competitive effects of the invasive shrub, Lonicera maackii (Rupr.) Herder (Caprifoliaceae), on the growth and survival of native tree seedlings , 2003, Plant Ecology.

[31]  D. Richardson,et al.  The effects of alien shrub invasions on vegetation structure and fire behaviour in South African fynbos shrublands: a simulation study. , 1985 .

[32]  Kristin Shrader-Frechette,et al.  Nonindigenous Species: Ecological Explanation, Environmental Ethics, and Public Policy , 2003 .

[33]  J. Turnbull,et al.  Tropical acacias planted in Asia: an overview , 1998 .

[34]  M. Williamson,et al.  The Varying Success of Invaders , 1996 .

[35]  D. Goldberg,et al.  Competitive effect and response in four annual plants , 1987 .

[36]  P. Becker,et al.  FLORISTIC COMPOSITION AND STAND STRUCTURE OF MIXED DIPTEROCARP AND HEATH FORESTS IN BRUNEI DARUSSALAM , 2002 .