The Flexible Balance of Evolutionary Novelty and Memory in the Face of Environmental Catastrophes

We study the effects of environmental catastrophes on the evolution of a population of sensory-motor agents with individually evolving mutation rates, and compare these effects in a variety of control systems. The evolution of mutation rates must balance (i) the need for evolutionary “novelty,” which pushes mutation rates up, and (ii) the need for evolutionary “memory,” which pushes mutation rates down. We observe that an environmental catastrophe initially shifts the balance toward evolutionary novelty and causes mutation rates to evolve upwards. Then, as the population adapts to the new environment, the balance shifts back toward evolutionary memory and the mutation rate falls. These observations support the hypothesis that second-order evolution of the mutation maintains a flexibly shifting balance between evolutionary novelty and memory.

[1]  Barry McMullin,et al.  John von Neumann and the Evolutionary Growth of Complexity: Looking Backward, Looking Forward , 2000, Artificial Life.

[2]  D. Green,et al.  Connectivity and Catastrophe-Towards a General Theory of Evolution , 2019 .

[3]  M. Eigen,et al.  Molecular quasi-species. , 1988 .

[4]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[5]  Filippo Menczer,et al.  From Complex Environments to Complex Behaviors , 1996, Adapt. Behav..

[6]  N. Packard,et al.  Connectivity and Catastrophe — Towards a General Theory of Evolution , 2000 .

[7]  D. Raup Biological extinction in earth history. , 1986, Science.

[8]  Barry McMullin,et al.  John von Neumann and the Evolutionary Growth of Complexity: Looking Backwards, Looking Forwards.. , 2004 .

[9]  John S. McCaskill,et al.  Open Problems in Artificial Life , 2000, Artificial Life.

[10]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[11]  Tim Taylor,et al.  On Self-Reproduction and Evolvability , 1999, ECAL.

[12]  Günter P. Wagner,et al.  Complex Adaptations and the Evolution of Evolvability , 2005 .

[13]  W. Hamilton The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[14]  W. Norton,et al.  Extinction: bad genes or bad luck? , 1991, New scientist.

[15]  M. Eigen,et al.  The Hypercycle: A principle of natural self-organization , 2009 .

[16]  N. Packard,et al.  Evolution of evolvability via adaptation of mutation rates. , 2003, Bio Systems.

[17]  Richard Walker,et al.  Niche Selection and the Evolution of Complex Behavior in a Changing EnvironmentA Simulation , 1999, Artificial Life.

[18]  Anil K. Seth,et al.  The evolution of complexity and the value of variability , 1998 .

[19]  M Conrad,et al.  Natural selection and the evolution of neutralism. , 1982, Bio Systems.