A test for linkage and association in general pedigrees: the pedigree disequilibrium test.

Family-based tests of linkage disequilibrium typically are based on nuclear-family data including affected individuals and their parents or their unaffected siblings. A limitation of such tests is that they generally are not valid tests of association when data from related nuclear families from larger pedigrees are used. Standard methods require selection of a single nuclear family from any extended pedigrees when testing for linkage disequilibrium. Often data are available for larger pedigrees, and it would be desirable to have a valid test of linkage disequilibrium that can use all potentially informative data. In this study, we present the pedigree disequilibrium test (PDT) for analysis of linkage disequilibrium in general pedigrees. The PDT can use data from related nuclear families from extended pedigrees and is valid even when there is population substructure. Using computer simulations, we demonstrated validity of the test when the asymptotic distribution is used to assess the significance, and examined statistical power. Power simulations demonstrate that, when extended pedigree data are available, substantial gains in power can be attained by use of the PDT rather than existing methods that use only a subset of the data. Furthermore, the PDT remains more powerful even when there is misclassification of unaffected individuals. Our simulations suggest that there may be advantages to using the PDT even if the data consist of independent families without extended family information. Thus, the PDT provides a general test of linkage disequilibrium that can be widely applied to different data structures.

[1]  W. Ewens,et al.  Transmission test for linkage disequilibrium: the insulin gene region and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). , 1993, American journal of human genetics.

[2]  D Curtis,et al.  A note on the application of the transmission disequilibrium test when a parent is missing. , 1995, American journal of human genetics.

[3]  W J Ewens,et al.  The TDT and other family-based tests for linkage disequilibrium and association. , 1996, American journal of human genetics.

[4]  B S Weir,et al.  Tests for linkage and association in nuclear families. , 1997, American journal of human genetics.

[5]  M. Zago,et al.  Diversity of the human Y chromosome of South American Amerindians: a comparison with Blacks, Whites, and Japanese from Brazil , 1997, Annals of human genetics.

[6]  D. Curtis,et al.  Use of siblings as controls in case‐control association studies , 1997, Annals of human genetics.

[7]  M. Boehnke,et al.  Genetic association mapping based on discordant sib pairs: the discordant-alleles test. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[8]  W. Ewens,et al.  A sibship test for linkage in the presence of association: the sib transmission/disequilibrium test. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[9]  B S Weir,et al.  A comparative study of sibship tests of linkage and/or association. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[10]  N M Laird,et al.  A discordant-sibship test for disequilibrium and linkage: no need for parental data. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[11]  M Knapp,et al.  The transmission/disequilibrium test and parental-genotype reconstruction: the reconstruction-combined transmission/ disequilibrium test. , 1999, American journal of human genetics.

[12]  G. Martin A Means to an End: The Biological Basis of Aging and Death. , 1999 .

[13]  N L Kaplan,et al.  Removing the sampling restrictions from family-based tests of association for a quantitative-trait locus. , 2000, American journal of human genetics.