On how to define, understand and describe risk

The prevailing perspectives and definitions of risk, at least in the engineering community, are based on probabilities. In this paper we argue that such perspectives and definitions are too narrow. The probability component of the risk concept should be replaced by uncertainty. By jumping directly into probabilities, important uncertainty aspects could easily be overlooked or truncated. In the paper we point at several extended risk definitions, and a formal structure for the various perspectives and definitions is developed. Fundamental concepts such as second-order probabilities and uncertainties are discussed. Examples are provided showing the importance of the choice of risk perspective in a risk assessment and decision-making context. The examples cover offshore operations, security and market price risks.

[1]  J. Dubucs,et al.  Philosophy of probability , 1993 .

[2]  S. Campbell,et al.  Determining overall risk , 2005 .

[3]  E. Rosa.  Metatheoretical foundations for post-normal risk , 1998 .

[4]  M. Elisabeth Paté-Cornell,et al.  Uncertainties in risk analysis: Six levels of treatment , 1996 .

[5]  S. Kaplan,et al.  On The Quantitative Definition of Risk , 1981 .

[6]  Bo Bergman,et al.  Conceptualistic Pragmatism: A framework for Bayesian analysis? , 2008 .

[7]  Roger M. Cooke,et al.  Probabilistic Risk Analysis: Probabilistic risk analysis , 2001 .

[8]  Terje Aven,et al.  A unified framework for risk and vulnerability analysis covering both safety and security , 2007, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[9]  David R. Mandel.  Toward a Concept of Risk for Effective Military Decision Making , 2007 .

[10]  Enrico Zio,et al.  An Introduction to the Basics of Reliability and Risk Analysis , 2007 .

[11]  T. Aven.  On The Precautionary Principle, In The Context of Different Perspectives on Risk , 2006 .

[12]  S. Hansson,et al.  Safety is more than the antonym of risk , 2006 .

[13]  F. Knight.  The economic nature of the firm: From Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit , 2009 .

[14]  David Woods,et al.  Resilience Engineering: Concepts and Precepts , 2006 .

[15]  W. Lowrance,et al.  Of Acceptable Risk: Science and the Determination of Safety , 1976 .

[16]  E. Douglas.  Managerial economics: Theory, practice, and problems , 1979 .

[17]  Peter Gärdenfors,et al.  Unreliable probabilities, risk taking and decision making , 1988 .

[18]  Nozer D. Singpurwalla,et al.  Reliability and risk , 2006 .

[19]  Nils-Eric Sahlin,et al.  On Higher Order Beliefs , 1993 .

[20]  E. Rosa.  The Social Amplification of Risk: The logical structure of the social amplification of risk framework (SARF): Meta theoretical foundations and policy implications , 2003 .

[21]  Henry H. Willis.  Guiding Resource Allocations Based on Terrorism Risk , 2007, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[22]  T. Aven,et al.  On risk defined as an event where the outcome is uncertain , 2009 .

[23]  Lee R. Abramson,et al.  Some Misconceptions About the Foundations of Risk Analysis , 1981 .

[24]  Marlys K. Christianson,et al.  Managing the unexpected , 2001 .

[25]  G. Apostolakis.  The concept of probability in safety assessments of technological systems. , 1990, Science.

[26]  R. Löfstedt.  The precautionary principle - Risk, regulation and politics , 2003 .

[27]  P. Gärdenfors,et al.  Decision, Probability, and Utility , 1988 .

[28]  Vedat Verter,et al.  Railroad transportation of dangerous goods: Population exposure to airborne toxins , 2007, Comput. Oper. Res..

[29]  T. Aven.  Foundations of risk analysis , 2003 .

[30]  R. Kasperson,et al.  The Social Amplification of Risk , 2003 .

[31]  P. Sandin.  Dimensions of the Precautionary Principle , 1999, Emerging Technologies: Ethics, Law and Governance.

[32]  Paola Petrosino,et al.  Hazard assessment at volcanic fields: the Campi Flegrei case history , 2001 .