Factors affecting click-through behavior in aggregated search interfaces

An aggregated search interface is designed to integrate search results from different sources (web, image, video, blog, etc) into a single result page. This paper presents two user studies investigating factors affecting users click-through behavior on aggregated search interfaces. We tested two aggregated search interfaces: one where results from the different sources are blended into a single list (called blended), and another, where results from each source are presented in a separate panel (called non-blended). A total of 1,296 search sessions performed by 48 participants were analysed in our study. Our results suggest that 1) the position of search results is significant only in the blended and not in the non-blended design; 2) participants' click-through behavior on videos is different from other sources; and finally 3) capturing a task's orientation towards particular sources is an important factor for further investigation and research.

[1]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Eyetracking Web Usability , 2009 .

[2]  Fernando Diaz,et al.  Integration of news content into web results , 2009, WSDM '09.

[3]  Jacques Savoy,et al.  Approaches to collection selection and results merging for distributed information retrieval , 2001, CIKM '01.

[4]  Eugene Agichtein,et al.  Identifying "best bet" web search results by mining past user behavior , 2006, KDD '06.

[5]  Jaime Carbonell,et al.  Multi-Document Summarization By Sentence Extraction , 2000 .

[6]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Effects of audio and visual surrogates for making sense of digital video , 2007, CHI.

[7]  Antonio Gulli,et al.  Building an open source meta-search engine , 2005, WWW '05.

[8]  Thorsten Joachims,et al.  Accurately Interpreting Clickthrough Data as Implicit Feedback , 2017 .

[9]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  From Keyword Search to Exploration: Designing Future Search Interfaces for the Web , 2010, Found. Trends Web Sci..

[10]  Jane Reid,et al.  A Task-Oriented Non-Interactive Evaluation Methodology for Information Retrieval Systems , 2000, Information Retrieval.

[11]  Edward Cutrell,et al.  An eye tracking study of the effect of target rank on web search , 2007, CHI.

[12]  Milad Shokouhi,et al.  Updating collection representations for federated search , 2007, SIGIR.

[13]  Yvonne Kammerer,et al.  How the interface design influences users' spontaneous trustworthiness evaluations of web search results: comparing a list and a grid interface , 2010, ETRA.

[14]  Martin Halvey,et al.  ViGOR: a grouping oriented interface for search and retrieval in video libraries , 2009, JCDL '09.

[15]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  Dimensions of relevance , 2000, Inf. Process. Manag..

[16]  Brenda Lobb,et al.  Effect of perceived attractiveness of web interface design on visual search of web sites , 2005, CHINZ '05.

[17]  Mounia Lalmas,et al.  A Task-Based Evaluation of an Aggregated Search Interface , 2009, SPIRE.

[18]  Barry Smyth,et al.  Are people biased in their use of search engines? , 2008, CACM.

[19]  Christopher B. Jones,et al.  Workshop on geographic information retrieval, SIGIR 2004 , 2004, SIGF.

[20]  Oren Etzioni,et al.  Grouper: A Dynamic Clustering Interface to Web Search Results , 1999, Comput. Networks.

[21]  Mounia Lalmas,et al.  INEX 2002 - 2006: Understanding XML Retrieval Evaluation , 2007, DELOS.

[22]  Mounia Lalmas,et al.  Dynamics of Genre and Domain Intents , 2010, AIRS.

[23]  Fernando Diaz,et al.  Sources of evidence for vertical selection , 2009, SIGIR.