Familiarity and preference for pitch probability profiles

We investigated familiarity and preference judgments of participants toward a novel musical system. We exposed participants to tone sequences generated from a novel pitch probability profile. Afterward, we either asked participants to identify more familiar or we asked participants to identify preferred tone sequences in a two-alternative forced-choice task. The task paired a tone sequence generated from the pitch probability profile they had been exposed to and a tone sequence generated from another pitch probability profile at three levels of distinctiveness. We found that participants identified tone sequences as more familiar if they were generated from the same pitch probability profile which they had been exposed to. However, participants did not prefer these tone sequences. We interpret this relationship between familiarity and preference to be consistent with an inverted U-shaped relationship between knowledge and affect. The fact that participants identified tone sequences as even more familiar if they were generated from the more distinctive (caricatured) version of the pitch probability profile which they had been exposed to suggests that the statistical learning of the pitch probability profile is involved in gaining of musical knowledge.

[1]  B. Tillmann,et al.  Implicit learning of tonality: a self-organizing approach. , 2000, Psychological review.

[2]  D. Huron,et al.  A Cognitive Approach to Medieval Mode: Evidence for an Historical Antecedent to the Major/Minor System , 2006 .

[3]  Leonard B. Meyer Emotion and Meaning in Music , 1957 .

[4]  C. Krumhansl,et al.  A Theory of Tonal Hierarchies in Music , 2010 .

[5]  M. Schmuckler,et al.  The perception of tonal structure through the differentiation and organization of pitches. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  D. Temperley Music and probability , 2006 .

[7]  R. Zajonc Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. , 1968 .

[8]  Kathleen Moore,et al.  Relationship of Musical Preference to Collative, Ecological, and Psychophysical Variables , 1989 .

[9]  G. Schlaug,et al.  Listening to Filtered Music as a Treatment Option for Tinnitus: A Review. , 2010, Music perception.

[10]  Carol L. Krumhansl,et al.  Perceiving Tonal Structure in Music. , 1985 .

[11]  Carla L. Hudson Kam,et al.  Humans Rapidly Learn Grammatical Structure in a New Musical Scale. , 2010, Music perception.

[12]  C. Krumhansl Cognitive Foundations of Musical Pitch , 1990 .

[13]  John G. Seamon,et al.  The mere exposure effect is based on implicit memory: Effects of stimulus type, encoding conditions, and number of exposures on recognition and affect judgments. , 1995 .

[14]  I. Peretz,et al.  Liking for happy- and sad-sounding music: Effects of exposure , 2008 .

[15]  J. D. Smith,et al.  Aesthetic preference and syntactic prototypicality in music: 'Tis the gift to be simple , 1990, Cognition.

[16]  I. Peretz,et al.  Exposure effects on music preference and recognition , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[17]  Z. Dienes,et al.  Implicit learning of nonlocal musical rules: implicitly learning more than chunks. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  K. Szpunar,et al.  Liking and memory for musical stimuli as a function of exposure. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[19]  D. Berlyne Studies in the New Experimental Aesthetics: Steps Toward an Objective Psychology of Aesthetic Appreciation, , 1974 .

[20]  C. Martindale,et al.  Aesthetic preference: Anomalous findings for Berlyne's psychobiological theory. , 1990 .

[21]  G. N. Cantor,et al.  Children's "like-dislike" ratings of familiarized and nonfamiliarized visual stimuli. , 1968 .