Characterization of focal hepatic masses by dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging: findings in 311 lesions.

This study aimed to determine the overall accuracy of known enhancement patterns for the characterization of a large series of focal hepatic masses on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) images. Breath-hold T1-weighted images of the liver acquired before intravenous gadolinium administration and serially over 6-10 min after contrast injection were acquired in < 25 a using FLASH or rapid spin-echo pulse sequences. A total of 311 proven focal hepatic masses in 128 patients were analyzed, including 192 malignant lesions (166 metastases and 26 hepatomas) and 119 benign lesions (48 cavernous hemangiomas, 45 hepatic cysts, and 26 other abnormalities). The lesions were evaluated for a variety of characteristics independently by two reviewers who were blinded to results. Cavernous hemangiomas showed early peripheral nodular enhancement (80% sensitivity and 99% specificity) and hepatic cysts showed no enhancement (100% sensitivity and 95% specificity). Hepatic metastases showed variable, moderate enhancement (47% by one reviewer and 74% by the other). Metastatic lesions from hypervascular primary neoplasms displayed peak enhancement during the hepatic artery dominant (bolus) phase, while other malignant neoplasms showed later peak enhancement (72% sensitivity and 77% specificity). Five metastatic foci with early homogeneous enhancement showed a delayed peripheral washout of contrast (rim sign), while no nonmetastatic foci displayed this finding (3% sensitivity and 100% specificity). Characteristic enhancement patterns of focal hepatic lesions were described in a large series of patients. This study confirms results of previous investigators who have shown that early nodular peripheral enhancement was highly specific for hemangiomas and lack of enhancement was highly specific for hepatic cysts. Hypervascular metastatic foci show earlier peak enhancement than other malignant lesions. Some (2-3%) metastatic lesions display a peripheral washout of contrast on serial images, with 100% specificity.

[1]  M. Recht,et al.  T1-weighted sequences for MR imaging of the liver: comparison of three techniques for single-breath, whole-volume acquisition at 1.0 and 1.5 T. , 1991, Radiology.

[2]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Distinction of hepatic cavernous hemangioma from hepatic metastases with MR imaging. , 1988, Radiology.

[3]  K. Wolf,et al.  Peripheral washout: a sign of malignancy on dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR images of focal liver lesions. , 1994, Radiology.

[4]  J. Wittenberg,et al.  Hepatic tumors: quantitative tissue characterization with MR imaging. , 1990, Radiology.

[5]  R. Passariello,et al.  MR characterization of hepatic lesions by t-null inversion recovery sequence. , 1990, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[6]  R. Sokal,et al.  Principles of numerical taxonomy , 1965 .

[7]  R. Edelman,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of cavernous hemangioma of the liver: tissue-specific characterization. , 1985, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  M. Taupitz,et al.  Hypervascular liver lesions: differentiation of focal nodular hyperplasia from malignant tumors with dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. , 1993, Radiology.

[9]  F C Simm,et al.  Focal liver disease: comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and T2-weighted fat-suppressed, FLASH, and dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging at 1.5 T. , 1992, Radiology.

[10]  A M Aisen,et al.  Hepatic cavernous hemangioma: magnetic resonance imaging. Work in progress. , 1985, Radiology.

[11]  J. Heiken,et al.  Cavernous hemangioma of the liver: assessment of MR tissue specificity with a simplified T2 index. , 1990, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[12]  M Lüning,et al.  Focal liver lesions: characterization with nonenhanced and dynamic contrast material-enhanced MR imaging. , 1994, Radiology.

[13]  K. Ohtomo,et al.  Hepatocellular carcinoma and cavernous hemangioma: differentiation with MR imaging. Efficacy of T2 values at 0.35 and 1.5 T. , 1988, Radiology.

[14]  K. Ohtomo,et al.  Noninvasive diagnosis of small cavernous hemangioma of the liver: advantage of MRI. , 1985, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  R. Semelka,et al.  Hypervascular malignant liver lesions: comparison of various MR imaging pulse sequences and dynamic CT. , 1994, Radiology.

[16]  J. Lee,et al.  Focal hepatic lesions: differentiation with MR imaging at 0.5 T. , 1991, Radiology.

[17]  R. Edelman,et al.  Dynamic MR imaging of the liver with Gd-DTPA: initial clinical results. , 1989, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  I. Mano,et al.  Fast spin echo imaging with suspended respiration: gadolinium enhanced MR imaging of liver tumors. , 1987, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[19]  P. Karhunen.  Benign hepatic tumours and tumour like conditions in men. , 1986, Journal of clinical pathology.

[20]  W. Meyers,et al.  Hepatic hemangiomas vs metastases: MR differentiation at 1.5 T. , 1990, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  K. Ohtomo,et al.  Hepatic tumors: dynamic MR imaging. , 1987, Radiology.

[22]  A. Baert,et al.  Gadolinium-DOTA enhanced fast imaging of liver tumors at 1.5 T. , 1990, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[23]  B. V. Van Beers,et al.  Dynamic spin-echo imaging with Gd-DTPA: value in the differentiation of hepatic tumors. , 1990, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[24]  S. Saini,et al.  Differentiation between small hepatic hemangiomas and metastases on MR images: importance of size-specific quantitative criteria. , 1990, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[25]  R. Weissleder,et al.  Differentiation of hepatic metastases from hepatic hemangiomas and cysts by using MR imaging. , 1988, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[26]  B. I. Choi,et al.  Small hepatocellular carcinoma versus small cavernous hemangioma: differentiation with MR imaging at 2.0 T. , 1990, Radiology.

[27]  T K Foo,et al.  Abdominal MR imaging: comparison of T2-weighted fast and conventional spin-echo, and contrast-enhanced fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging. , 1993, Radiology.

[28]  R Weissleder,et al.  Primary liver tumors: diagnosis by MR imaging. , 1989, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[29]  J. Heiken,et al.  Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced rapid acquisition spin-echo MR imaging of the liver. , 1991, Radiology.

[30]  A. Rahmouni,et al.  Focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver: assessment with contrast-enhanced TurboFLASH MR imaging. , 1991, Radiology.

[31]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Hepatic hemangiomas and malignant tumors: improved differentiation with heavily T2-weighted conventional spin-echo MR imaging. , 1994, Radiology.

[32]  R. Edelman,et al.  Hepatic hemangiomas: a multi-institutional study of appearance on T2-weighted and serial gadolinium-enhanced gradient-echo MR images. , 1994, Radiology.

[33]  K. Ohtomo,et al.  Small hepatocellular carcinoma and cavernous hemangioma: differentiation with dynamic FLASH MR imaging with Gd-DTPA. , 1989, Radiology.

[34]  K. Ohtomo,et al.  Hepatic tumors: differentiation by transverse relaxation time (T2) of magnetic resonance imaging. , 1985, Radiology.

[35]  B Hamm,et al.  Differentiation of hepatic hemangiomas from metastases by dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. , 1990, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[36]  U. Klose,et al.  Dynamic Sequential MR Imaging of Focal Liver Lesions: Initial Experience in 22 Patients at 1.5 T , 1990, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[37]  T. Murakami,et al.  Differentiation between hepatoma and hemangioma with inversion-recovery snapshot FLASH MRI and Gd-DTPA. , 1992, Journal of computer assisted tomography.