The Potential of CEB Reinforced Masonry Technology for (Re)construction in the Context of Disasters

More than 226 million people are affected by some type of disaster every year in various dimensions of human life, both in the short and long term. In this context, housing provision plays a leading role when it comes to basic needs and the choice of construction technologies and materials are determinant for a well-succeeded housing provision process. This work aims to analyze the viability of reinforced masonry technology with cement-stabilized compressed earth blocks as an alternative for the (re)construction process in situations that involve disaster risk reduction (DRR). To address this issue, a discussion from the literature and the main results obtained during the investigations carried out within the scope of the Simple Housing Solution (SHS) Project are presented. In the sequence, analyses are performed under United Nations Development Program/International Recovery Platform sustainability recommendations: environmental, technical, financial and socio-organizational aspects. It is concluded that the technology of Compressed Earth Blocks (CEBs) reinforced structural masonry has a high potential to be successfully applied in DRR situations, especially when associated with the community construction system in a joint effort.

[1]  Elizabeth Vintzileou,et al.  Testing Historic Masonry Elements and/or Building Models , 2014 .

[2]  S. Barakat.  Housing reconstruction after conflict and disaster , 2003 .

[3]  Charles E. Augarde,et al.  Chronological Description of the Spatial Development of Rammed Earth Techniques , 2008 .

[4]  T. Moreira.  Experimental characterization of dry-stack interlocking compressed earth block masonry , 2015 .

[5]  Lakshmi Keshav,et al.  Finite Element and Experimental Analysis of 3D Masonry Compressed Stabilised Earth Block and Brick Building Models against Earthquake Forces , 2014 .

[6]  José Amarilio Barbosa,et al.  Thermal performance assessment of masonry made of ICEB’s stabilised with alkali-activated fly ash , 2017 .

[7]  Nicholas Anthony Herskedal.  Investigation of Out-of-Plane Properties of Interlocking Compressed Earth Block Walls , 2012 .

[8]  Andrea Caswell.  Shelter , 2018, Definitions.

[9]  Hugh Lockhart-Ball.  The ecology of building materials, 2nd edition, by Bjørn Berge, translated by Chris Butters and Filip Henley , 2011 .

[10]  Joan.  UN-HABITAT:For a Better Urban Future , 2011 .

[11]  M. Dabaieh.  More than Vernacular: Vernacular Architecture between Past Tradition and Future Vision , 2015 .

[12]  J. S. Camacho.  PROJETO DE EDIFÍCIOS DE ALVENARIA ESTRUTURAL , 2006 .

[13]  Chris Beckett,et al.  Life cycle analysis of environmental impact vs. durability of stabilised rammed earth , 2017 .

[14]  David William Bland,et al.  In-Plane Cyclic Shear Performance of Interlocking Compressed Earth Block Walls , 2011 .

[15]  B. Qu,et al.  PERFORMANCE OF INTERLOCKING COMPRESSED EARTH BLOCK INFILL IN CONFINED MASONRY CONSTRUCTION , 2014 .

[16]  Gernot Minke.  Earth Construction Handbook: The Building Material Earth in Modern Architecture , 2000 .

[17]  Unidad Nacional para la Gestión del Riesgo de Desastres.  Guía municipal para la gestión del riesgo , 2010 .

[18]  Paris A. Fokaides,et al.  Cradle to site Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of adobe bricks , 2016 .

[19]  Bradley James Stirling.  Flexural Behavior of Interlocking Compressed Earth Block Shear Walls Subjected to In-Plane Loading , 2011 .

[20]  Bjørn Berge,et al.  The Ecology of Building Materials , 2000 .

[21]  R. Mateus,et al.  Life cycle analysis of environmental impacts of earthen materials in the Portuguese context: Rammed earth and compressed earth blocks , 2019 .

[22]  Said Jalali,et al.  Construção em terra , 2009 .

[23]  Carlos Sousa Oliveira,et al.  Earthquake Risk Reduction: From Scenario Simulators Including Systemic Interdependency to Impact Indicators , 2014 .

[24]  Catarina Thormark,et al.  The effect of material choice on the total energy need and recycling potential of a building , 2006 .