Convexity in scientific collaboration networks
暂无分享,去创建一个
Dalibor Fiala | Luka Kronegger | Lovro Subelj | Tadej Ciglaric | L. Kronegger | Lovro Šubelj | Dalibor Fiala | Tadej Ciglarič | L. Šubelj
[1] Luka Kronegger,et al. Dynamic Scientific Co-Authorship Networks , 2012 .
[2] Massimo Franceschet,et al. Collaboration in computer science: a network science approach. Part II , 2011, ArXiv.
[3] Jörn Altmann,et al. Identifying the effects of co-authorship networks on the performance of scholars: A correlation and regression analysis of performance measures and social network analysis measures , 2011, J. Informetrics.
[4] Ying Ding,et al. Applying centrality measures to impact analysis: A coauthorship network analysis , 2009 .
[5] L. Krumov,et al. Motifs in co-authorship networks and their relation to the impact of scientific publications , 2011 .
[6] Mirella M. Moro,et al. The strength of co-authorship ties through different topological properties , 2017, Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society.
[7] Frank Harary,et al. Convexity in graphs , 1981 .
[8] Ying Ding,et al. Scientific collaboration and endorsement: Network analysis of coauthorship and citation networks , 2011, J. Informetrics.
[9] Romina Rodela. On the use of databases about research performance: comments on Karlovčec and Mladenić (2015) and others using the SICRIS database , 2016, Scientometrics.
[10] Noriko Hara,et al. An emerging view of scientific collaboration: Scientists' perspectives on collaboration and factors that impact collaboration , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[11] Marcelo Bronzo Ladeira,et al. An analysis of international coauthorship networks in the supply chain analytics research area , 2017, Scientometrics.
[12] A. R.,et al. Review of literature , 1969, American Potato Journal.
[13] A-L Barabási,et al. Structure and tie strengths in mobile communication networks , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[14] Johan Bollen,et al. Co-authorship networks in the digital library research community , 2005, Inf. Process. Manag..
[15] J. Sylvan Katz,et al. Geographical proximity and scientific collaboration , 1994, Scientometrics.
[16] Hildrun Kretschmer,et al. Author productivity and geodesic distance in bibliographic co-authorship networks, and visibility on the Web , 2004, Scientometrics.
[17] Ludo Waltman,et al. Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting , 2016, J. Informetrics.
[18] Kevin W. Boyack,et al. Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature , 2011, J. Informetrics.
[19] Mark Newman,et al. Networks: An Introduction , 2010 .
[20] Loet Leydesdorff,et al. Full and fractional counting in bibliometric networks , 2016, J. Informetrics.
[21] P. Leifeld,et al. Collaboration patterns in the German political science co-authorship network , 2017, PloS one.
[22] Loet Leydesdorff,et al. Betweenness centrality as a driver of preferential attachment in the evolution of research collaboration networks , 2011, J. Informetrics.
[23] Lovro Subelj,et al. Convex skeletons of complex networks , 2017, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.
[24] Mark S. Granovetter. The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.
[25] Jana Diesner,et al. Distortive effects of initial‐based name disambiguation on measurements of large‐scale coauthorship networks , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[26] Olle Persson,et al. Studying research collaboration using co-authorships , 1996, Scientometrics.
[27] J. S. Katz,et al. What is research collaboration , 1997 .
[28] Van de M. L. J. Vel. Theory of convex structures , 1993 .
[29] Jana Diesner,et al. The effect of data pre-processing on understanding the evolution of collaboration networks , 2015, J. Informetrics.
[30] G. Laudel. What do we measure by co-authorships? , 2002 .
[31] Matjaz Perc,et al. Growth and structure of Slovenia's scientific collaboration network , 2010, J. Informetrics.
[32] M. Farber,et al. Convexity in graphs and hypergraphs , 1986 .
[33] A. Barabasi,et al. Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations , 2001, cond-mat/0104162.
[34] Wolfgang Glänzel,et al. National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations , 2004, Scientometrics.
[35] Stefano Nasini,et al. Research impact in co-authorship networks: a two-mode analysis , 2017, J. Informetrics.
[36] C. Lee Giles,et al. Collaboration over time: characterizing and modeling network evolution , 2008, WSDM '08.
[37] M. Newman,et al. Random graphs with arbitrary degree distributions and their applications. , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.
[38] M. Newman. Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[39] Ding-wei Huang,et al. Correlation between impact and collaboration , 2011, Scientometrics.
[40] Luka Kronegger,et al. Scientific collaboration dynamics in a national scientific system , 2015, Scientometrics.
[41] Sameer Kumar,et al. Research collaboration networks of two OIC nations: comparative study between Turkey and Malaysia in the field of ‘Energy Fuels’, 2009–2011 , 2013, Scientometrics.
[42] Jana Diesner,et al. Over-time measurement of triadic closure in coauthorship networks , 2017, Social Network Analysis and Mining.
[43] Barry Bozeman,et al. Research Collaboration and Team Science , 2014 .
[44] M. Newman,et al. Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.
[45] M. Newman,et al. The structure of scientific collaboration networks. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[46] Lovro Subelj,et al. Convexity in complex networks , 2016, Network Science.
[47] M E Newman,et al. Scientific collaboration networks. I. Network construction and fundamental results. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.
[48] Edward M Marcotte,et al. LGL: creating a map of protein function with an algorithm for visualizing very large biological networks. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.