An Informatics Approach for Smart Evaluation of Water Quality Related Ecosystem Services

Understanding the relationship between water quality and ecosystem services valuation requires a broad range of approaches and methods from the domains of environmental science, ecology, physics and mathematics. The fundamental challenge is to decode the association between 'ecosystem services geography' with water quality distribution in time and in space. This demands the acquisition and integration of vast amounts of data from various domains in many formats and types. Here we present our system development concept to support the research in this field. We outline a technological approach that harnesses the power of data with scientific analytics and technology advancement in the evolution of a data ecosystem to evaluate water quality. The framework integrates the mobile applications and web technology into citizen science, environmental simulation and visualization. We describe a schematic design that links water quality monitoring and technical advances via collection by citizen scientists and professionals to support ecosystem services evaluation. These would be synthesized into big data analytics to be used for assessing ecosystem services related to water quality. Finally, the paper identifies technical barriers and opportunities, in respect of big data ecosystem, for valuating water quality in ecosystem services assessment.

[1]  Georgina M. Mace,et al.  Economic Analysis for Ecosystem Service Assessments , 2011 .

[2]  Contributions from M. Walpole.  The Millennium Development Goals Report , 2008 .

[3]  Jiangxiao Qiu,et al.  Spatial interactions among ecosystem services in an urbanizing agricultural watershed , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Roy Haines-Young,et al.  Considerations in environmental science and management for the design of natural asset checks in public policy appraisal , 2011 .

[5]  Søren Højsgaard,et al.  Graphical Independence Networks with the gRain Package for R , 2012 .

[6]  J. Bromley,et al.  The use of Hugin® to develop Bayesian networks as an aid to integrated water resource planning , 2005, Environ. Model. Softw..

[7]  Kate A Brauman,et al.  Linking water quality and well-being for improved assessment and valuation of ecosystem services , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Serena H. Chen,et al.  Guidelines for Good Practice in Bayesian Network Modelling , 2010 .

[9]  M. Bowes,et al.  How green is my river? A new paradigm of eutrophication in rivers. , 2006, The Science of the total environment.

[10]  Chiara Franzoni,et al.  Crowd Science: The Organization of Scientific Research in Open Collaborative Projects , 2014 .

[11]  J. Silvertown.  A new dawn for citizen science. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[12]  Mark E. Borsuk,et al.  A Bayesian network of eutrophication models for synthesis, prediction, and uncertainty analysis , 2004 .

[13]  K. Reckhow.  Water quality prediction and probability network models , 1999 .

[14]  Andrew C. Johnson,et al.  Physico-chemical factors alone cannot simulate phytoplankton behaviour in a lowland river , 2013 .

[15]  Abdeltawab M. Hendawi,et al.  AMADEUS: A System for Monitoring Water Quality Parameters and Predicting Contaminant Paths , 2014 .

[16]  Kenji Takeda,et al.  Science in the cloud: lessons from three years of research projects on microsoft azure , 2014, ScienceCloud '14.

[17]  Wouter Buytaert,et al.  Web-based environmental simulation: bridging the gap between scientific modeling and decision-making. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  B. Hasler,et al.  Making Benefit Transfers Work: Deriving and Testing Principles for Value Transfers for Similar and Dissimilar Sites Using a Case Study of the Non-Market Benefits of Water Quality Improvements Across Europe , 2011 .

[19]  D. Boorman,et al.  Which offers more scope to suppress river phytoplankton blooms: reducing nutrient pollution or riparian shading? , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[20]  Colin M Beale,et al.  Revealing ecological networks using Bayesian network inference algorithms. , 2010, Ecology.

[21]  Steve Kelling,et al.  Data-intensive science applied to broad-scale citizen science. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[22]  Tim Foster,et al.  Harnessing Mobile Communications Innovations for Water Security , 2012 .

[23]  Bao Xin-hua.  Application of Bayesian Network in Water Resource Management , 2011 .

[24]  D. Boorman,et al.  Analysis of the QUESTOR water quality model using a Fourier amplitude sensitivity test (FAST) for two UK rivers. , 2006, The Science of the total environment.

[25]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Realising the full potential of citizen science monitoring programs , 2013 .

[26]  Khalil Shihab,et al.  AN EFFICIENT METHOD F OR ASSESSING WATER QUALITY BASED ON BAYESIAN BELIEF N ETWORKS , 2014 .

[27]  B. Marcot,et al.  Bayesian belief networks: applications in ecology and natural resource management , 2006 .

[28]  J. C. Packman,et al.  Assessing the impact of urbanization on storm runoff in a peri-urban catchment using historical change in impervious cover , 2014 .

[29]  H. Mooney,et al.  Human Domination of Earth’s Ecosystems , 1997, Renewable Energy.

[30]  Matthew B Jones,et al.  Ecoinformatics: supporting ecology as a data-intensive science. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[31]  Edward M. Buchak,et al.  CE-QUAL-W2: A Two-Dimensional, Laterally Averaged, Hydrodynamic and Water Quality Model, Version 2.0. User Manual. , 1995 .

[32]  Tim A. Wool,et al.  WASP4, a hydrodynamic and water-quality model - model theory, user's manual, and programmer's guide , 1988 .

[33]  M. Goodchild.  Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography , 2007 .

[34]  A. Schloss,et al.  Using mobile phones to engage citizen scientists in research , 2011 .

[35]  Harry Dixon,et al.  CEH-GEAR: 1 km resolution daily and monthly areal rainfall estimates for the UK for hydrological use , 2015 .

[36]  Rick Bonney,et al.  The history of public participation in ecological research , 2012 .