Comparison of flow-reversal, internal-recirculation and loop reactors

In this work, we compare the performance of flow-reversal, internal-recirculation and loop reactors. In the absence of analytical results we use asymptotic, approximate and simulated solutions and present some experimental results. As criteria for comparison we use the maximal temperature achieved and the robustness of solution. Experiments and simulations of ethylene oxidation in the flow-reversal and internal-recirculation reactor, showed that the technically simpler inner–outer internal-recycle reactor may operate better at low flow rates than that with flow reversal, but the conclusion is reversed at high flow rates. Using approximate solutions, we show the dependence of the maximal temperature on the inner–outer heat-transfer coefficient. Loop reactor can generate rotating pulse solution: we simulate such solutions for two asymptotic cases where the ratio of switching velocity (i.e., unit length/switching time) to pattern velocity is either around unity or very large. We compare them with solutions of 4–8 units reactors. The slow-switching regimes require a delicate control. The fast-switching solution is robust but its peak temperature depends on the kinetic parameters and reactor length, compared with that of the flow-reversal reactor where it depends mainly on bed conductivity.

[1]  Y. Matros,et al.  Unsteady-State Performance of Heterogeneous Catalytic Reactions , 1983 .

[2]  Gilbert F. Froment,et al.  The STAR configuration for methanol synthesis in reversed flow reactors , 1996 .

[3]  Moshe Sheintuch,et al.  Spatiotemporal patterns in thermokinetic models of cross‐flow reactors , 2000 .

[4]  Davide Fissore,et al.  Synthesis gas production in a forced unsteady-state reactor network , 2003 .

[5]  Differential flow instability of the exothermic standard reaction in a tubular cross-flow reactor , 1994 .

[6]  A. S. Noskov,et al.  Reverse-process for NOx - off gases decontamination , 1993 .

[7]  The decontamination of gases by unsteady-state catalytic method: Theory and practice , 1993 .

[8]  Moshe Sheintuch,et al.  Flow-rate effects in flow-reversal reactors: experiments, simulations and approximations , 2003 .

[9]  M. Sheintuch,et al.  Comparing flow‐reversal and inner recirculation reactors: Experiments and simulations , 2003 .

[10]  Davide Manca,et al.  Complex dynamic behaviour of methanol synthesis in the ring reactor network , 2004 .

[11]  Ernst Dieter Gilles,et al.  Circulating reaction zones in a packed-bed loop reactor , 1994 .

[12]  Gerhart Eigenberger,et al.  Autothermal fixed-bed reactor concepts , 2000 .

[13]  E. W. Jacobsen,et al.  Approximate characteristics of a moving temperature front in a fixed-bed catalytic reactor based on a heterogeneous reactor model. , 1999 .

[14]  Moshe Sheintuch,et al.  The asymptotes of loop reactors , 2005 .

[15]  R. Pontier,et al.  Reverse flow reactor at short switching periods for VOC combustion , 2001 .

[16]  Ulrich Nieken,et al.  Catalytic combustion with periodic flow reversal , 1988 .

[17]  Antonello Barresi,et al.  Unsteady state treatment of very lean waste gases in a network of catalytic burners , 1999 .