Physics Based Contrast Marking and Inpainting Based Local Texture Comparison for Clustered Microcalcification Detection

As important early signs of breast cancers, microcalcifications (MCs) are still very difficult to be reliably detected by either radiologists or computer-aided diagnosis systems. In general, global, regional, and local properties of the mammogram should all be considered in the analysis process. In our effort, we incorporate the physical nature of the imaging process with the image analysis techniques to detect the clustered microcalcifications based on local contrast marking and self-repaired texture comparison. Suspicious areas are first obtained from a simplified X-ray imaging model where the MC contrast is a nonlinear function of local intensity. Following a removal and repair (R&R) procedure of the suspicious areas from their surrounding background textures, pre- and post- R&R local characteristic features of these areas are extracted and compared. A modified AdaBoost algorithm is then used to train the classifier for detecting individual microcalcification, followed by a clustering process to obtain the clustered MCs. Experiments on the MIAS database have shown promising results.

[1]  Susan M. Astley,et al.  Automation in mammography: computer vision and human perception , 1993, Electronic Imaging.

[2]  Nikolas P. Galatsanos,et al.  Support vector machine learning for detection of microcalcifications in mammograms , 2002, Proceedings IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging.

[3]  Tony F. Chan,et al.  Inpainting based on nonlinear transport and diffusion , 2002 .

[4]  S. Mallat A wavelet tour of signal processing , 1998 .

[5]  John Håkon Husøy,et al.  Optimal filter for detection of clustered microcalcifications , 2000, Proceedings 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. ICPR-2000.

[6]  Vladimir N. Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory , 2000, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[7]  Osmar R. Zaïane,et al.  Mammography Classification By an Association Rule-based Classifier , 2002, MDM/KDD.

[8]  Uday B. Desai,et al.  An unsupervised scheme for detection of microcalcifications on mammograms , 2000, Proceedings 2000 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. No.00CH37101).

[9]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Normalization of local contrast in mammograms , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  Robin N. Strickland,et al.  Wavelet transforms for detecting microcalcifications in mammograms , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[11]  K L Lam,et al.  Computer-aided detection of mammographic microcalcifications: pattern recognition with an artificial neural network. , 1995, Medical physics.

[12]  Atam P. Dhawan,et al.  ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK BASED CLASSIFICATION OF MAMMOGRAPHIC MICROCALCIFICATIONS USING IMAGE STRUCTURE FEATURES , 1993 .

[13]  Angelo Chianese,et al.  Using Renyi's Information and Wavelets for Target Detection: An Application to Mammograms , 2000, Pattern Analysis & Applications.

[14]  N Karssemeijer,et al.  Accurate segmentation and contrast measurement of microcalcifications in mammograms: a phantom study. , 1998, Medical physics.

[15]  Yoav Freund,et al.  Experiments with a New Boosting Algorithm , 1996, ICML.

[16]  Chi-Keung Tang,et al.  Image repairing: robust image synthesis by adaptive ND tensor voting , 2003, 2003 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2003. Proceedings..