The Role of Stakeholders in the Context of Responsible Innovation: A Meta-Synthesis

This paper contributes to the sustainability debate by analyzing the inclusion dimension in the responsible research and innovation (RRI) process. RRI is claimed to be an important tool for addressing global challenges and achieving sustainable development goals. While stakeholder involvement is considered to be imperative for the RRI process, there is little empirical evidence on (1) who the stakeholders participating in the RRI process are; (2) when stakeholders participate; (3) how stakeholders’ inclusion contributes to the sustainable innovation process; and (4) who the agents are who orchestrate stakeholders’ inclusion. This paper addresses the issue of stakeholder involvement through the lens of innovation management literature by attempting to link the innovation process to the responsibility concept. We employed a meta-synthesis of empirical studies of RRI to develop a deep understanding of stakeholder inclusion. After screening 139 articles, we identified seven empirical papers highlighting RRI process, mainly from projects nested in academic contexts. The findings indicate that multiple stakeholders are included at a late stage of the innovation process—during the market launch. To some extent, this allows for the adaptation of the solution, but such adaptations are limited in nature. This study also identifies the agents who stimulate stakeholder inclusion as being mainly academic researchers and researchers linked to multi-institutional projects. Our findings indicate that innovation management thinking is rarely applied in the governance of research and innovation projects ‘born’ in academia. We suggest enhancing RRI theoretical development by incorporating elements of innovation management such as early inclusion of users in the innovation process. For practitioners, this means an extension of the design space to allow early stakeholder inclusion in the innovation process to ensure responsible outcomes. We also identified avenues for future research. There is a need to systematically investigate which tools and frameworks for deliberate stakeholder inclusion are relevant at the various stages of the innovation and development process.

[1]  Joe Tidd,et al.  Strategic Innovation Management , 2014 .

[2]  Science in Society in Europe , 2012 .

[3]  ilse Marschalek,et al.  Public Engagement in Responsible Research and Innovation , 2017 .

[4]  R. Freeman The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions , 1994, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[5]  Orla Shortall,et al.  Are plants the new oil? Responsible innovation, biorefining and multipurpose agriculture , 2015 .

[6]  Vincent Blok,et al.  Stakeholder engagement for responsible innovation in the private sector: critical issues and management practices , 2015 .

[7]  D. Finfgeld,et al.  Metasynthesis: The State of the Art—So Far , 2003, Qualitative health research.

[8]  Jack Stilgoe,et al.  Experiments in Science Policy: An Autobiographical Note , 2012 .

[9]  J. Stilgoe,et al.  Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society , 2012, Emerging Technologies: Ethics, Law and Governance.

[10]  Kate Millar,et al.  Integrating social and value dimensions into sustainability assessment of lignocellulosic biofuels , 2015, Biomass & bioenergy.

[11]  Audley Genus,et al.  Responsible innovation: its institutionalisation and a critique , 2017 .

[12]  Una Mansfield,et al.  Innovation and Entrepreneurship , 1986 .

[13]  R. Duane Ireland,et al.  Resource Orchestration to Create Competitive Advantage , 2010 .

[14]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Dynamic capabilities : understanding strategic change in organizations , 2007 .

[15]  Sarma Cakula,et al.  Automated Learning Support System to Provide Sustainable Cooperation between Adult Education Institutions and Enterprises , 2015 .

[16]  G. Huylenbroeck,et al.  When technology is more than instrumental: How ethical concerns in EU agriculture co-evolve with the development of GM crops , 2017 .

[17]  V. Rerimassie Early Engagement with Synthetic Biology in the Netherlands—Initiatives by the Rathenau Instituut , 2016 .

[18]  R. Cooper Agile–Stage-Gate Hybrids , 2016 .

[19]  J. Kuzma,et al.  Cataloguing the barriers facing RRI in innovation pathways: a response to the dilemma of societal alignment , 2018, Journal of Responsible Innovation.

[20]  Arie Rip,et al.  Nano-ethics as NEST-ethics: Patterns of Moral Argumentation About New and Emerging Science and Technology , 2007 .

[21]  D. Parker,et al.  Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews , 2015, International journal of evidence-based healthcare.

[22]  Einar Rasmussen,et al.  Understanding academic entrepreneurship: Exploring the emergence of university spin-off ventures using process theories , 2011 .

[23]  A. Scherer,et al.  Global Rules and Private Actors - Towards a New Role of the Transnational Corporation in Global Governance , 2006 .

[24]  Jens Leker,et al.  Open and closed innovation - different innovation cultures for different strategies , 2010, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[25]  C. Groves,et al.  Communicating through vulnerability: knowledge politics, inclusion and responsiveness in responsible research and innovation , 2016 .

[26]  Bernd Carsten Stahl,et al.  Responsible research and innovation: The role of privacy in an emerging framework , 2013 .

[27]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[28]  Brijesh Singh,et al.  The Lean Startup:How Today's Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses , 2016 .

[29]  Tiziana Russo Spena,et al.  CSR, innovation strategy and supply chain management: toward an integrated perspective , 2012, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[30]  S. M. Flipse,et al.  Enhancing Socially Responsible Innovation in Industry: Practical Use for Considerations of Social and Ethical Aspects in Industrial Life Science & Technology , 2013 .

[31]  Catherine M. Dalton,et al.  Meta-Analyses , 2008 .

[32]  Richard Owen,et al.  Governance of new product development and perceptions of responsible innovation in the financial sector: insights from an ethnographic case study , 2014 .

[33]  J. Stilgoe,et al.  Developing a framework for responsible innovation* , 2013, The Ethics of Nanotechnology, Geoengineering and Clean Energy.

[34]  G. Bruton,et al.  Harnessing Innovation for Change: Sustainability and Poverty in Developing Countries , 2013 .

[35]  P. Lehoux,et al.  Responsible research and innovation: a productive model for the future of medical innovation , 2016 .

[36]  Tomás Gómez-Navarro,et al.  Addressing Climate Change in Responsible Research and Innovation: Recommendations for Its Operationalization , 2018, Sustainability.

[37]  V. Blok,et al.  The Emerging Concept of Responsible Innovation. Three Reasons Why It Is Questionable and Calls for a Radical Transformation of the Concept of Innovation , 2015 .

[38]  K. Vogel Revolution versus evolution?: Understanding scientific and technological diffusion in synthetic biology and their implications for biosecurity policies , 2014 .

[39]  J. Bessant,et al.  Responsible Innovation in Healthcare - the case of health information TV , 2017 .

[40]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[41]  Jennifer A. Howard-Grenville,et al.  Understanding and tackling societal grand challenges through management research , 2016 .

[42]  R. Rothwell Towards the Fifth‐generation Innovation Process , 1994 .

[43]  Onno S. W. F. Omta,et al.  Lessons for Responsible Innovation in the Business Context: A Systematic Literature Review of Responsible, Social and Sustainable Innovation Practices , 2017 .

[44]  Christina Hoon,et al.  Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Case Studies , 2012 .

[45]  G. Warnaby,et al.  Understanding stakeholder interactions in urban partnerships , 2016 .

[46]  M. Decker,et al.  Imagined technology futures in demand-oriented technology assessment , 2017 .

[47]  Margus Pedaste,et al.  Definitions and Conceptual Dimensions of Responsible Research and Innovation: A Literature Review , 2017, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[48]  Matthias Kaiser,et al.  Responsible techno-innovation in aquaculture: Employing ethical engagement to explore attitudes to GM salmon in Northern Europe , 2015 .

[49]  Fern Wickson,et al.  The Walkshop Approach to Science and Technology Ethics , 2015, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[50]  Lizbeth Goodman,et al.  People with Disabilities Leading the Design of Serious Games and Virtual Worlds , 2017, Int. J. Serious Games.

[51]  Christine Nadel,et al.  Case Study Research Design And Methods , 2016 .

[52]  Bernd Carsten Stahl,et al.  Ethics of healthcare robotics: Towards responsible research and innovation , 2016, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[53]  F. Kupper,et al.  Inclusive deliberation and action in emerging RRI practices: the case of neuroimaging in security management , 2016 .

[54]  P. Benneworth,et al.  Introducing the dilemma of societal alignment for inclusive and responsible research and innovation , 2018, Journal of Responsible Innovation.

[55]  R. Spinello The future of intellectual property , 2003, Ethics and Information Technology.

[56]  Bernd Carsten Stahl,et al.  Responsible research and innovation: Critical reflection into the potential social consequences of ICT , 2013, IEEE 7th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS).

[57]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid 1 , 2005 .

[58]  SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE INNOVATIONS ( SRI ) FROM A TRANSACTIONAL COST PERSPECTIVE-A CHANCE FOR GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OR A WASTE OF TIME AND MONEY ? , 2014 .

[59]  G. Ordóñez-Matamoros,et al.  Futures of science with and for society: towards transformative policy orientations , 2016 .

[60]  Cynthia Selin,et al.  Merging art and design in foresight: Making sense of Emerge , 2015 .

[61]  C. Herstatt,et al.  The Effect of Selective Openness on Value Creation in User Innovation Communities , 2014 .

[62]  M. Gorman,et al.  A framework for responsible innovation , 2013 .

[63]  R. Freeman Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , 2010 .

[64]  David H Guston,et al.  Understanding ‘anticipatory governance’ , 2014, Social Studies of Science.

[65]  T. Brown,et al.  Change by Design , 2011 .

[66]  Breaking barriers for a bio-based economy : Interactive reflection on monitoring water quality , 2017 .

[67]  Alan MacCormack,et al.  Managing the Sources of Uncertainty: Matching Process and Context in Software Development , 2003 .

[68]  A. Rip,et al.  Next-Generation Innovation Policy and Grand Challenges , 2018 .

[69]  Un Desa Transforming our world : The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development , 2016 .

[70]  R. Cooper Agile-Stage-Gate Hybrids: The Next Stage for Product Development , 2016 .

[71]  M. Requier-Desjardins,et al.  The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development , 2015, An Insider's Guide to the UN.

[72]  Emad Yaghmaei Responsible research and innovation key performance indicators in industry: A case study in the ICT domain , 2018, J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc..

[73]  Mariarosaria Taddeo,et al.  On the Risks of Relying on Analogies to Understand Cyber Conflicts , 2016, Minds and Machines.

[74]  J. Hecht,et al.  Thinking about the future. A critique of the limits to growth , 1974 .

[75]  Jack Stilgoe Geoengineering as Collective Experimentation , 2016, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[76]  G. Rowe,et al.  A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms , 2005 .

[77]  R. V. Schomberg A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation , 2013 .

[78]  David G. Sirmon,et al.  Managing Firm Resources in Dynamic Environments to Create Value: Looking Inside the Black Box , 2007 .

[79]  Arie Rip,et al.  Constructing Productive Engagement: Pre-engagement Tools for Emerging Technologies , 2011, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[80]  Miguel A. Rodríguez,et al.  Using Stakeholder Dialogue as a Source for New Ideas - a Dynamic Capability Underlying Sustainable Innovation , 2006 .