New Termination-of-Resuscitation Models and Prognostication in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Using Electrocardiogram Rhythms Documented in the Field and the Emergency Department

Background Electrocardiogram (ECG) rhythms, particularly shockable rhythms, are crucial for planning cardiac arrest treatment. There are varying opinions regarding treatment guidelines depending on ECG rhythm types and documentation times within pre-hospital settings or after hospital arrivals. We aimed to determine survival and neurologic outcomes based on ECG rhythm types and documentation times. Methods This prospective observational study of 64 emergency medical centers was performed using non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest registry data between October 2015 and June 2017. From among 4,608 adult participants, 4,219 patients with pre-hospital and hospital ECG rhythm data were enrolled. Patients were divided into 3 groups: those with initial-shockable, converted-shockable, and never-shockable rhythms. Patient characteristics and survival outcomes were compared between groups. Further, termination of resuscitation (TOR) validation was performed for 6 combinations of TOR criteria confirmed in previous studies, including 2 rules developed in the present study. Results Total survival to discharge after cardiac arrest was 11.7%, and discharge with good neurologic outcomes was 7.9%. Survival to discharge rates and favorable neurologic outcome rates for the initial-shockable group were the highest at 35.3% and 30.2%, respectively. There were no differences in survival to discharge rates and favorable neurologic outcome rates between the converted-shockable (4.2% and 2.0%, respectively) and never-shockable groups (5.7% and 1.9%, respectively). Irrespective of rhythm changes before and after hospital arrival, TOR criteria inclusive of unwitnessed events, no pre-hospital return of spontaneous circulation, and asystole in the emergency department best predicted poor neurologic outcomes (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.911) with no patients classified as Cerebral Performance Category 1 or 2 (specificity = 1.000). Conclusion Survival outcomes and TOR predictions varied depending on ECG rhythm types and documentation times within pre-hospital filed or emergency department and should, in the future, be considered in treatment algorithms and prognostications of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03222999

[1]  Seung Chul Lee,et al.  Effect of National Implementation of Telephone CPR Program to Improve Outcomes from Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: an Interrupted Time-Series Analysis , 2018, Journal of Korean medical science.

[2]  N. Yonemoto,et al.  Subsequent shock deliveries are associated with increased favorable neurological outcomes in cardiac arrest patients who had initially non-shockable rhythms , 2015, Critical Care.

[3]  S. Ishimatsu,et al.  A New Rule for Terminating Resuscitation of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients in Japan: A Prospective Study. , 2017, The Journal of emergency medicine.

[4]  L. Køber,et al.  Bystander Efforts and 1‐Year Outcomes in Out‐of‐Hospital Cardiac Arrest , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  J. Tao,et al.  Prognostic significance of spontaneous shockable rhythm conversion in adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with initial non-shockable heart rhythms: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2017, Resuscitation.

[6]  B. McNally,et al.  Abstract 58: Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Outcomes Stratified by Rhythm Analysis , 2010 .

[7]  Seil Oh,et al.  Korean Cardiac Arrest Research Consortium (KoCARC): rationale, development, and implementation , 2018, Clinical and experimental emergency medicine.

[8]  Y. Hayashi,et al.  Subsequent ventricular fibrillation and survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests presenting with PEA or asystole. , 2008, Resuscitation.

[9]  A. Idris,et al.  Conversion to shockable rhythms is associated with better outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with initial asystole but not in those with pulseless electrical activity. , 2016, Resuscitation.

[10]  T. Maeda,et al.  Prognostic implications of conversion from nonshockable to shockable rhythms in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest , 2014, Critical Care.

[11]  T. Maeda,et al.  Termination-of-resuscitation rule for emergency department physicians treating out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: an observational cohort study , 2013, Critical Care.

[12]  D. Lockey,et al.  Pre-hospital extra-corporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation , 2018, Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine.

[13]  J. Soar,et al.  Prognostication in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest: An advisory statement from the European Resuscitation Council and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine , 2014, Intensive Care Medicine.

[14]  P. Pek,et al.  Conversion to shockable rhythms during resuscitation and survival for out‐of hospital cardiac arrest , 2017, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[15]  A. Hagihara,et al.  The number of prehospital defibrillation shocks and 1-month survival in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest , 2015, Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine.

[16]  K. Heimann,et al.  Adult “termination-of-resuscitation” (TOR)-criteria may not be suitable for children - a retrospective analysis , 2016, Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine.

[17]  Andrew J. Thomas,et al.  Survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests with initial asystole or pulseless electrical activity and subsequent shockable rhythms. , 2013, Resuscitation.

[18]  T. Rho,et al.  Epidemiology and Outcomes in Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Report from the NEDIS-Based Cardiac Arrest Registry in Korea , 2014, Journal of Korean medical science.

[19]  Fredrik Folke,et al.  Association of national initiatives to improve cardiac arrest management with rates of bystander intervention and patient survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. , 2013, JAMA.

[20]  Mary Ann Peberdy,et al.  Part 8: Post–Cardiac Arrest Care 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care , 2015, Circulation.

[21]  M. Ong,et al.  Current termination of resuscitation (TOR) guidelines predict neurologically favorable outcome in Japan. , 2013, Resuscitation.

[22]  T. Rea,et al.  The relationship between shocks and survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients initially found in PEA or asystole. , 2007, Resuscitation.

[23]  Antonio R. Fernandez,et al.  Part 2: Evidence Evaluation and Management of Conflicts of Interest: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. , 2015, Circulation.