Detection and accuracy rates of dogs trained to find scats of San Joaquin kit foxes (Vulpes macrotis mutica)

Specially trained detection dogs have been used to locate faeces (scats) for faecal analyses but their effectiveness has not been quantified. We evaluated detection and accuracy rates of dogs trained to find scats of endangered San Joaquin kit foxes (Vulpes macrotis mutica). Four dogs found from 0.43 to 5.37 presumptive kit fox scats per km of transect searched in two field sites where kit foxes and coyotes (Canis latrans) but not non-native red foxes (V. vulpes) were present. The unusually low detection rate (0.43 scats per km) by one dog (probably due to excessive panting in hot weather) was still similar to the average scat detection rate of two experienced humans. DNA tests of 1298 scats showed that all dogs were 100% accurate at distinguishing kit fox scats under our field conditions. Because red foxes are sympatric with kit foxes in some areas, we also conducted controlled discrimination experiments to see if trained dogs could distinguish between scats from kit and red foxes. Four dogs were 100% accurate at choosing a kit fox scat when red fox scats were present (n = 64 trials), but were less accurate at ignoring red fox scats in trials where a kit fox scat was absent.

[1]  Burton M. Slotnick,et al.  Odor matching and odor memory in the rat , 1993, Physiology & Behavior.

[2]  R. Wayne,et al.  Estimating population size by genotyping faeces , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  C. Mcarthur,et al.  Observer error in counts of macropod scats , 2000 .

[4]  D. J. Neff.  The pellet-group count technique for big game trend, census, and distribution : a review , 1968 .

[5]  B Fogle.  Search-and-rescue Dogs. , 1988, The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne.

[6]  K. Ralls,et al.  Canine Assistants for Conservationists , 2001, Science.

[7]  William G. Syrotuck.  Scent and the scenting dog , 2000 .

[8]  Michael K. Schwartz,et al.  ESTIMATING ANIMAL ABUNDANCE USING NONINVASIVE DNA SAMPLING: PROMISE AND PITFALLS , 2000 .

[9]  K. J. Gutzwiller.  MINIMIZING DOG-INDUCED BIASES IN GAME BIRD RESEARCH , 1990 .

[10]  R. Wayne,et al.  Facts from feces revisited. , 1997, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[11]  E. Paxinos,et al.  A noninvasive method for distinguishing among canid species: amplification and enzyme restriction of DNA from dung , 1997, Molecular ecology.

[12]  J. Halfpenny,et al.  A Field Guide to Mammal Tracking in North America , 1986 .

[13]  Joseph Chilver,et al.  The Basic Techniques , 1979 .

[14]  M. Syvanen,et al.  Molecular tracking of mountain lions in the Yosemite Valley region in California: genetic analysis using microsatellites and faecal DNA , 2000, Molecular ecology.

[15]  L. Boitani,et al.  Noninvasive molecular tracking of colonizing wolf (Canis lupus) packs in the western Italian Alps , 2002, Molecular ecology.

[16]  D. Broom,et al.  Human scent matching using specially trained dogs , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[17]  Andrew Rebmann,et al.  Cadaver Dog Handbook: Forensic Training and Tactics for the Recovery of Human Remains , 2000 .

[18]  D M Irwin,et al.  Evolution of the cytochrome b gene of mammals. , 1991, Journal of molecular evolution.

[19]  J. Birks,et al.  On the origin of faeces: morphological versus molecular methods for surveying rare carnivores from their scats , 2002 .

[20]  G.A.A. Schoon,et al.  Scent identification lineups by dogs (Canis familiaris): experimental design and forensic application , 1996 .

[21]  K. Ralls,et al.  Predation on San Joaquin Kit Foxes by Larger Canids , 1995 .

[22]  R. Putman.  Facts from faeces , 1984 .