Shared Control of a Guided Parafoil and Payload System

The direct inclusion of human pilots into airdrop operations has a strong potential to increase the landing accuracy of conventionally autonomous guided airdrop systems. Human pilots have significant mental flexibility and an innate ability to prioritize requirements to aid safe and accurate landings. Autonomous algorithms on the other hand, are generally rigid in nature and cannot handle situations not directly programmed into the software. This paper outlines the work done to develop an integrated human-machine interface that combines the flexibility of human control decisions with the powerful ability of autonomous systems to measure data on the aircraft and generate key estimates. Two interfaces are presented melding a first person view camera mounted to the payload of the airdrop system and a bird's eye GPS based map of the drop zone with relevant system estimates overlaid. Flight testing of these digital feedback methods to the pilot are studied to identify the ability of human operators to successfully and accurately control an airdrop system to the ground. Results indicated that a trained human operator has the ability to improve landing accuracy over a conventionally autonomous system by 36%.

[1]  Mark Costello,et al.  Human-in-the-loop control of guided airdrop systems , 2015, Aerospace Science and Technology.

[2]  T. Takenaka,et al.  The development of Honda humanoid robot , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.98CH36146).

[3]  Ju-Jang Lee,et al.  Artificial Force Reflection Control for Teleoperated Mobile Robots , 1997 .

[4]  Antonio Franchi,et al.  Shared Control : Balancing Autonomy and Human Assistance with a Group of Quadrotor UAVs , 2012, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[5]  Michael Ward Adaptive Glide Slope Control for Parafoil and Payload Aircraft , 2012 .

[6]  Randal W. Beard,et al.  Semi-autonomous human-UAV interfaces for fixed-wing mini-UAVs , 2004, 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37566).

[7]  Jonathan Rogers,et al.  Terminal Guidance for Complex Drop Zones Using Massively Parallel Processing , 2013 .

[8]  N. Slegers,et al.  Utilizing Ground-Based LIDAR for Autonomous Airdrop , 2013 .

[9]  Claudio Melchiorri,et al.  Teleoperation of a mobile robot through haptic feedback , 2002, IEEE International Workshop HAVE Haptic Virtual Environments and Their.

[10]  Heath A. Ruff,et al.  Manual Versus Speech Input for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Control Station Operations , 2003 .

[11]  Chris Baber,et al.  Human Factors in UAV , 2012 .

[12]  Magnus Egerstedt,et al.  Human-in-the-loop: MPC for shared control of a quadruped rescue robot , 2011, 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[13]  James E. Murray,et al.  Further development and flight test of an autonomous precision landing system using a parafoil , 1994 .

[14]  Mary L. Cummings,et al.  Automation Architecture for Single Operator, Multiple UAV Command and Control, , 2007 .

[15]  R. Brent Gillespie,et al.  Shared control between human and machine: haptic display of automation during manual control of vehicle heading , 2004, 12th International Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, 2004. HAPTICS '04. Proceedings..

[16]  E G Ewing,et al.  Recovery Systems Design Guide , 1978 .

[17]  Josué Jr. Guimarães Ramos,et al.  A semi-autonomous robotic airship for environmental monitoring missions , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.98CH36146).

[18]  Takuya Nojima,et al.  Method of Trajectory Generation for Perspective Flight-Path Display in Estimated Wind Condition , 2013, J. Aerosp. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Transparent layered user interfaces: an evaluation of a display design to enhance focused and divided attention , 1995, CHI '95.