Collaborative Concept Development Using Supplier Competitions: Insights from the Automotive Industry

Firms may seek to collaborate with skilled suppliers not only to access existing technologies but also to jointly develop new concepts. We sought to examine the details of collaborative concept development through matched cases of novel convertible roof projects in the European automotive industry. The result is a three phase model marked by the use of supplier concept competitions to probe possible features and by the selective maintenance of distance to suppliers. Knowledge transfer and integration practices, differences depending on initial experience, and implications for managing such distributed systems of innovation are highlighted.

[1]  Charles H. Fine,et al.  Time Versus Market Orientation in Product Concept Development: Empirically-Based Theory Generation , 1997 .

[2]  Charles F. Sabel,et al.  Pragmatic Collaborations: Advancing Knowledge While Controlling Opportunism , 2000 .

[3]  Robert W. Veryzer.  Discontinuous innovation and the new product development process , 1998 .

[4]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[5]  A. Bonaccorsi,et al.  Strategic Partnerships in New Product Development: an Italian Case Study , 1994 .

[6]  R. Handfield,et al.  Involving Suppliers in New Product Development , 1999 .

[7]  K. Clark.  Project scope and project performance: the effect of parts strategy and supplier involvement on product development , 1989 .

[8]  E. Hippel.  Sticky Information and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation , 1994 .

[9]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry , 1995 .

[10]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: An Empirical Test , 1995 .

[11]  Thomas V. Scannell,et al.  Success Factors for Integrating Suppliers into New Product Development , 1997 .

[12]  Robert B. Handfield,et al.  Effects of concurrent engineering on make-to-order products , 1994 .

[13]  Xenophon Koufteros,et al.  Internal and External Integration for Product Development: The Contingency Effects of Uncertainty, Equivocality, and Platform Strategy , 2005, Decis. Sci..

[14]  R. Handfield,et al.  A Model of Supplier Integration into New Product Development , 2003 .

[15]  Andrew Campbell,et al.  The Oxford handbook of strategy , 2006 .

[16]  Fredrik Von Corswant,et al.  Coordinating customers and proactive suppliers: A case study of supplier collaboration in product development , 2002 .

[17]  A. Edmondson,et al.  METHODOLOGICAL FIT IN MANAGEMENT FIELD RESEARCH. , 2007 .

[18]  Vittorio Chiesa,et al.  Differences and similarities in managing technological collaborations in research, development and manufacturing: a case study , 2000 .

[19]  R. Stebbins.  Exploratory research in the social sciences , 2001 .

[20]  Links between internal and external cooperation in product development: An exploratory study , 2004 .

[21]  S. Vickery,et al.  The ability to minimize the timing of new product development and introduction: an examination of antecedent factors in the North American automobile supplier industry , 2000 .

[22]  Dale Littler,et al.  Complexities of collaborative product development , 1995 .

[23]  Stephan M. Wagner,et al.  Buyer-Supplier Collaboration in Product Development Projects , 2005 .

[24]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[25]  P. Humphreys,et al.  Supplier involvement in product development in the electronics industry: A case study , 2006 .

[26]  Jeffrey K. Liker,et al.  Supplier dependence and innovation: a contingency model of suppliers' innovative activities , 1990 .

[27]  Rebecca Grant,et al.  Determinants of new product designers' satisfaction with suppliers' contributions , 1997 .

[28]  J. Liker,et al.  Risky Business or Competitive Power? Supplier Involvement in Japanese Product Design , 1997 .

[29]  Joseph A. Maxwell,et al.  Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach , 1996 .

[30]  D. Littler,et al.  Factors Affecting the Process of Collaborative Product Development: A Study of UK Manufacturers of Information and Communications Technology Products , 1995 .

[31]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[32]  Seungwha Chung,et al.  Performance effects of partnership between manufacturers and suppliers for new product development: the supplier's standpoint , 2003 .

[33]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Product Development Decisions: A Review of the Literature , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[34]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Product development performance : strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry / Kim B. Clark, Tahahiro Fujimoto , 1991 .

[35]  Victor P. Seidel.  Concept Shifting and the Radical Product Development Process , 2007 .

[36]  Akira Takeishi,et al.  Special Issue: Knowledge, Knowing, and Organizations: Knowledge Partitioning in the Interfirm Division of Labor: The Case of Automotive Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[37]  A. Langley.  Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[38]  Akira Takeishi,et al.  Bridging inter‐ and intra‐firm boundaries: management of supplier involvement in automobile product development , 2001 .

[39]  D. Leonard-Barton.  CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[40]  R. Grant.  The Knowledge-Based View of the Firm , 2006 .

[41]  F. Wynstra,et al.  Managing supplier involvement in product development:: Three critical issues , 2001 .

[42]  W. Ouchi,et al.  JAPANESE-STYLE PARTNERSHIPS -- GIVING COMPANIES A COMPETITIVE EDGE. , 1993 .

[43]  F. Wynstra,et al.  Managing supplier involvement in new product development: A multiple-case study , 2006 .