Rejection and modelling of sulphate and potassium salts by nanofiltration membranes: neural network and Spiegler–Kedem model

This paper presents experimental data and modelling for three commercial nanofiltration membranes (NF90, NF270, N30F) used to treat highly concentrated different salts solutions (KCl, Na2SO4, and MgSO4) in a crossflow filtration set-up at a salinity level similar to that of seawater. The main parameters that have been studied in this work are feed pressure and salt concentration. The experimental data were correlated and analysed using artificial neural network (ANN) and Spiegler–Kedem model. Through the latter model, the reflection coefficient of all studied membranes and the solute permeability have been determined for all membranes at different salinity levels. The ANN’s prediction of rejection vs. pressure and rejection vs. permeate flux for all investigated salt solutions is discussed. The results showed that both NF90 and NF270 produced a high rejection in the range of 95–99% at a pressure greater than 5 bar for Na2SO4, and MgSO4 salts, while for KCl the rejection was in the range of 30–89%. N30F gave relatively medium rejection and flux for Na2SO4 and MgSO4 salts and very low rejection and flux for KCl. A good agreement has been obtained using the ANN predictions and the experimental data with a deviation not more than 5% for most of the cases considered. The ANN interpolative performance for the medium concentration levels (which were not represented in the training phase) is shown to be of lesser quality. A comparison between ANN model and Spiegler–Kedem model is also discussed.

[1]  M. Afonso,et al.  Streaming potential measurements to assess the variation of nanofiltration membranes surface charge with the concentration of salt solutions , 2001 .

[2]  W. Richard Bowen,et al.  Modelling the retention of ionic components for different nanofiltration membranes , 2001 .

[3]  Oumar Sarr,et al.  A phenomenological mass transfer approach in nanofiltration of halide ions for a selective defluorination of brackish drinking water , 2003 .

[4]  Shoji Kimura,et al.  ANALYSIS OF SOLUTES REJECTION IN ULTRAFILTRATION , 1981 .

[5]  W. Richard Bowen,et al.  DYNAMIC ULTRAFILTRATION OF PROTEINS-A NEURAL NETWORK APPROACH , 1998 .

[6]  David Hasson,et al.  Utilization of the Donnan effect for improving electrolyte separation with nanofiltration membranes , 1996 .

[7]  Mohammad A.K. Al-Sofi,et al.  Seawater desalination — SWCC experience and vision , 2001 .

[8]  Carlo Vandecasteele,et al.  Removal of pollutants from surface water and groundwater by nanofiltration: overview of possible applications in the drinking water industry. , 2003, Environmental pollution.

[9]  W. Richard Bowen,et al.  Characterisation and prediction of separation performance of nanofiltration membranes , 1996 .

[10]  Nidal Hilal,et al.  Neural Networks Simulation of the Filtration of Sodium Chloride and Magnesium Chloride Solutions Using Nanofiltration Membranes , 2007 .

[11]  P. Schirg,et al.  CHARACTERISATION OF NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES FOR THE SEPARATION OF AQUEOUS DYE-SALT SOLUTIONS , 1992 .

[12]  Nidal Hilal,et al.  Nanofiltration of highly concentrated salt solutions up to seawater salinity , 2005 .

[13]  Serena Bandini,et al.  Nanofiltration modeling: the role of dielectric exclusion in membrane characterization , 2003 .

[14]  A. Mohammad,et al.  Characterisation of nanofiltration membranes using atomic force microscopy , 2005 .

[15]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning representations by back-propagating errors , 1986, Nature.

[16]  Nidal Hilal,et al.  A comprehensive review of nanofiltration membranes:Treatment, pretreatment, modelling, and atomic force microscopy , 2004 .

[17]  G. Trystram,et al.  Dynamic modeling of crossflow microfiltration using neural networks , 1995 .

[18]  J. Laîné,et al.  Neural networks for prediction of ultrafiltration transmembrane pressure – application to drinking water production , 1998 .

[19]  J. Wesselingh,et al.  Can nanofiltration be fully predicted by a model , 2002 .

[20]  W. Richard Bowen,et al.  Predicting salt rejections at nanofiltration membranes using artificial neural networks , 2000 .

[21]  W. Richard Bowen,et al.  Diafiltration by nanofiltration: Prediction and optimization , 1998 .

[22]  Pierre-Yves Pontalier,et al.  Specific model for nanofiltration , 1999 .

[23]  Ata M. Hassan,et al.  Nanofiltration as a means of achieving higher TBT of ≥ 120°C in MSF , 1998 .

[24]  Eric Latrille,et al.  Application of artificial neural networks for crossflow microfiltration modelling: “black-box” and semi-physical approaches , 1997 .

[25]  P. Schweitzer,et al.  Handbook of Separation Techniques for Chemical Engineers , 1997 .

[26]  C. Vandecasteele,et al.  Influence of ion size and charge in nanofiltration , 1998 .

[27]  J. P. Boom,et al.  Retention measurements of nanofiltration membranes with electrolyte solutions , 1998 .

[28]  K. S. Spiegler,et al.  Thermodynamics of hyperfiltration (reverse osmosis): criteria for efficient membranes , 1966 .

[29]  A. Katchalsky,et al.  Permeability of composite membranes. Part 1.—Electric current, volume flow and flow of solute through membranes , 1963 .

[30]  Peter Eriksson,et al.  Nanofiltration extends the range of membrane filtration , 1988 .

[31]  Ata M. Hassan,et al.  A demonstration plant based on the new NF-SWRO process , 2000 .

[32]  H. G. Spencer,et al.  Dye-salt separations by nanofiltration using weak acid polyelectrolyte membranes , 1997 .

[33]  Nidal Hilal,et al.  CHARACTERISATION OF NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES FOR PREDICTIVE PURPOSES - USE OF SALTS, UNCHARGED SOLUTES AND ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY , 1997 .

[34]  Enrico Drioli,et al.  Energetic and exergetic analysis of an integrated membrane desalination system , 1999 .

[35]  I Koyuncu,et al.  APPLICATION OF NANOFILTRATION AND REVERSE OSMOSIS MEMBRANES TO THE SALTY AND POLLUTED SURFACE WATER , 2001, Journal of environmental science and health. Part A, Toxic/hazardous substances & environmental engineering.

[36]  W. Richard Bowen,et al.  Prediction of the rate of crossflow membrane ultrafiltration of colloids: A neural network approach , 1998 .

[37]  Michel Cabassud,et al.  Modelling of ultrafiltration fouling by neural network , 1998 .

[38]  Michel Cabassud,et al.  Dynamic modelling of crossflow microfiltration of bentonite suspension using recurrent neural networks , 1999 .

[39]  Octavian Pastravanu,et al.  Neural network models for ultrafiltration and backwashing , 2000 .

[40]  G. Hagmeyer,et al.  Modelling the salt rejection of nanofiltration membranes for ternary ion mixtures and for single salts at different pH values , 1998 .

[41]  Ata M. Hassan,et al.  A new approach to membrane and thermal seawater desalination processes using nanofiltration membranes (Part 1) , 1998 .