Measuring physical disablement: the contextual challenge.

Context is a fundamental consideration in physical therapy assessment and in the interpretation of physical disablement. Specification of context may include physical requirements of a task such as the demands for speed or a specific degree of accuracy, or the social context in which an activity is performed such as dressing for work versus dressing for leisure activities. Context also encompasses individual factors such as the importance of particular activities within the person's culture or value system, or the specific types of roles requiring physical functioning that a person resumes upon discharge from physical therapy. Data are presented to illustrate the differences in performance across related physical tasks and between self-care and mobility tasks in home and school settings in children with severe functional delays. These data highlight the potential impact of context on performance. Implications for future development of functional assessments are discussed, particularly in light of the importance of incorporating contextual information in the clinical interpretation of disablement outcomes for patient groups and individual patients.

[1]  W. Dunn Measurement of function: actions for the future. , 1993, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[2]  A G Fisher,et al.  The assessment of IADL motor skills: an application of many-faceted Rasch analysis. , 1993, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[3]  M. Law,et al.  Evaluating activities of daily living: directions for the future. , 1993, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[4]  C Christiansen Continuing challenges of functional assessment in rehabilitation: recommended changes. , 1993, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[5]  M Short-DeGraff,et al.  Improving functional assessment in occupational therapy: recommendations and philosophy for change. , 1993, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[6]  P. Stratford,et al.  Measuring Physical Impairment and Disability With the Chedoke‐McMaster Stroke Assessment , 1993, Stroke.

[7]  Motor Assessment Tools for Infants and Young Children: A Focus on Disability Assessment , 1992 .

[8]  W. Coster,et al.  Pediatric Functional Outcome Measures , 1991 .

[9]  A. Guccione Physical therapy diagnosis and the relationship between impairments and function. , 1991, Physical therapy.

[10]  M. Schenkman,et al.  A model for multisystem evaluation, interpretation, and treatment of individuals with neurologic dysfunction. , 1989, Physical therapy.

[11]  J. Lockman,et al.  Action in Social Context , 1989 .

[12]  R. Levine,et al.  Self-Care: A Comparison of Patients' Institutional and Home Performance , 1987 .

[13]  A. Gentile,et al.  Skill acquisition : Action, movement, and neuromotor processes , 1987 .

[14]  B. Rogoff Integrating context and cognitive development , 1982 .

[15]  G. Masters,et al.  Rating scale analysis , 1982 .

[16]  K. Fischer A theory of cognitive development: The control and construction of hierarchies of skills. , 1980 .

[17]  Are hospital assessments of daily living activities valid? , 1979, International rehabilitation medicine.

[18]  S. Z. Nagi Some conceptual issues in disability and rehabilitation , 1965 .