A simple method to determine the surface charge in microfluidic channels

We study EOF through microchannels, made of glass or glass‐PDMS, by displacing an electrolyte solution at given concentration with the same electrolyte at a different concentration via an external electric field. When a constant voltage is applied over the channel, the electric current through the channel varies during the displacement process. We propose a simple analytical model that describes the time dependence of the current regardless of the concentration ratio chosen. With this model, which is applicable beyond the Debye–Hückel limit, we are able to quantify the EOF velocity and to determine the surface charge on the microchannel walls from the measured current behavior, as well as the zeta potential at given local electrolyte concentration.

[1]  J. Baret,et al.  Electrowetting: from basics to applications , 2005 .

[2]  Dongqing Li,et al.  Determining zeta Potential and Surface Conductance by Monitoring the Current in Electro-osmotic Flow. , 2000, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[3]  Jacob Masliyah,et al.  Experimental and theoretical study of the displacement process between two electrolyte solutions in a microchannel. , 2003, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[4]  Juan G. Santiago,et al.  Investigation of internal pressure gradients generated in electrokinetic flows with axial conductivity gradients , 2007 .

[5]  K. Ooi,et al.  Characterization of electroosmotic flow in rectangular microchannels , 2007 .

[6]  D. Burgreen,et al.  Electrokinetic Flow in Ultrafine Capillary Slits1 , 1964 .

[7]  R. Zare,et al.  Current-monitoring method for measuring the electroosmotic flow rate in capillary zone electrophoresis , 1988 .

[8]  Carlos Escobedo,et al.  Electroosmotic Flow in a Microcapillary with One Solution Displacing Another Solution , 2001 .

[9]  Che-Hsin Lin,et al.  On the surface modification of microchannels for microcapillary electrophoresis chips , 2005, Electrophoresis.

[10]  S. Quake,et al.  Microfluidics: Fluid physics at the nanoliter scale , 2005 .

[11]  Dongqing Li,et al.  A new method of evaluating the average electro-osmotic velocity in microchannels. , 2002, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[12]  G. Bruin,et al.  Recent developments in electrokinetically driven analysis on microfabricated devices , 2000, Electrophoresis.

[13]  P. Renaud,et al.  Transport phenomena in nanofluidics , 2008 .

[14]  E. Hasselbrink,et al.  Zeta potential of microfluidic substrates: 1. Theory, experimental techniques, and effects on separations , 2004, Electrophoresis.

[15]  Paul H Steen,et al.  Determination of the zeta potential of porous substrates by droplet deflection. I. The influence of ionic strength and pH value of an aqueous electrolyte in contact with a borosilicate surface. , 2009, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[16]  D. A. Saville,et al.  Colloidal Dispersions: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS , 1989 .

[17]  Dongqing Li,et al.  Direct and indirect electroosmotic flow velocity measurements in microchannels. , 2002, Journal of colloid and interface science.