dCtBP mediates transcriptional repression by Knirps, Krüppel and Snail in the Drosophila embryo

The pre‐cellular Drosophila embryo contains 10 well characterized sequence‐specific transcriptional repressors, which represent a broad spectrum of DNA‐binding proteins. Previous studies have shown that two of the repressors, Hairy and Dorsal, recruit a common co‐repressor protein, Groucho. Here we present evidence that three different repressors, Knirps, Krüppel and Snail, recruit a different co‐repressor, dCtBP. Mutant embryos containing diminished levels of maternal dCtBP products exhibit both segmentation and dorsoventral patterning defects, which can be attributed to loss of Krüppel, Knirps and Snail activity. In contrast, the Dorsal and Hairy repressors retain at least some activity in dCtBP mutant embryos. dCtBP interacts with Krüppel, Knirps and Snail through a related sequence motif, PXDLSXK/H. This motif is essential for the repression activity of these proteins in transgenic embryos. We propose that dCtBP represents a major form of transcriptional repression in development, and that the Groucho and dCtBP co‐repressors mediate separate pathways of repression.

[1]  Roger Brent,et al.  Groucho is required for Drosophila neurogenesis, segmentation, and sex determination and interacts directly with hairy-related bHLH proteins , 1994, Cell.

[2]  Z. Paroush,et al.  Conversion of dorsal from an activator to a repressor by the global corepressor Groucho. , 1997, Genes & development.

[3]  Y. Jan,et al.  rhomboid, a gene required for dorsoventral axis establishment and peripheral nervous system development in Drosophila melanogaster. , 1990, Genes & development.

[4]  M. Levine,et al.  Transcriptional regulation of a pair-rule stripe in Drosophila. , 1991, Genes & development.

[5]  S. Stifani,et al.  The Groucho/Transducin-like Enhancer of split Transcriptional Repressors Interact with the Genetically Defined Amino-terminal Silencing Domain of Histone H3* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[6]  D Kosman,et al.  The dorsal morphogen gradient regulates the mesoderm determinant twist in early Drosophila embryos. , 1991, Genes & development.

[7]  Z. Paroush,et al.  Groucho acts as a corepressor for a subset of negative regulators, including Hairy and Engrailed. , 1997, Genes & development.

[8]  M. Levine,et al.  Interaction of short-range repressors with Drosophila CtBP in the embryo. , 1998, Science.

[9]  R. Reuter,et al.  Interacting functions of snail, twist and huckebein during the early development of germ layers in Drosophila. , 1994, Development.

[10]  M. Levine,et al.  The dorsal morphogen is a sequence-specific DNA-binding protein that interacts with a long-range repression element in drosophila , 1991, Cell.

[11]  Alfred L. Fisher,et al.  The WRPW motif of the hairy-related basic helix-loop-helix repressor proteins acts as a 4-amino-acid transcription repression and protein-protein interaction domain , 1996, Molecular and cellular biology.

[12]  D Kosman,et al.  Concentration-dependent patterning by an ectopic expression domain of the Drosophila gap gene knirps. , 1997, Development.

[13]  Z. Paroush,et al.  Torso signalling regulates terminal patterning in Drosophila by antagonising Groucho-mediated repression. , 1997, Development.

[14]  J. Licht,et al.  Two evolutionarily conserved repression domains in the Drosophila Kruppel protein differ in activator specificity , 1997, Molecular and cellular biology.

[15]  J. Turner,et al.  Cloning and characterization of mCtBP2, a co‐repressor that associates with basic Krüppel‐like factor and other mammalian transcriptional regulators , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[16]  M. Levine,et al.  Mutually repressive interactions between the gap genes giant and Krüppel define middle body regions of the Drosophila embryo. , 1991, Development.

[17]  H. Jäckle,et al.  Sp1/egr-like zinc-finger protein required for endoderm specification and germ-layer formation in Drosophila , 1994, Nature.

[18]  M. Levine,et al.  Conversion of a dorsal‐dependent silencer into an enhancer: evidence for dorsal corepressors. , 1993, The EMBO journal.

[19]  N. Perrimon,et al.  The autosomal FLP-DFS technique for generating germline mosaics in Drosophila melanogaster. , 1996, Genetics.

[20]  M. Levine,et al.  Spacing ensures autonomous expression of different stripe enhancers in the even-skipped promoter. , 1993, Development.

[21]  M. Levine,et al.  Short-range transcriptional repressors mediate both quenching and direct repression within complex loci in Drosophila. , 1996, Genes & development.

[22]  C. Thummel,et al.  Vectors for Drosophila P-element-mediated transformation and tissue culture transfection. , 1988, Gene.

[23]  M. Levine,et al.  Regulation of the dorsal morphogen by the Toll and torso signaling pathways: a receptor tyrosine kinase selectively masks transcriptional repression. , 1994, Genes & development.

[24]  M. Levine,et al.  The gap protein knirps mediates both quenching and direct repression in the Drosophila embryo. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[25]  M. Frasch,et al.  Characterization and localization of the even‐skipped protein of Drosophila. , 1987, The EMBO journal.

[26]  M. Levine,et al.  The dorsal gradient morphogen regulates stripes of rhomboid expression in the presumptive neuroectoderm of the Drosophila embryo. , 1992, Genes & development.

[27]  Peter A. Lawrence,et al.  Control of Drosophila body pattern by the hunchback morphogen gradient , 1992, Cell.

[28]  M. Pazin,et al.  What's Up and Down with Histone Deacetylation and Transcription? , 1997, Cell.

[29]  M. Levine,et al.  Regulation of even‐skipped stripe 2 in the Drosophila embryo. , 1992, The EMBO journal.

[30]  S. Parkhurst,et al.  Drosophila CtBP: a Hairy‐interacting protein required for embryonic segmentation and Hairy‐mediated transcriptional repression , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[31]  D Kosman,et al.  Establishment of the mesoderm-neuroectoderm boundary in the Drosophila embryo. , 1991, Science.

[32]  P. Lieberman,et al.  Dorsal-ventral patterning in Drosophila: DNA binding of snail protein to the single-minded gene. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  A. Sundqvist,et al.  The carboxy‐terminal region of adenovirus E1A activates transcription through targeting of a C‐terminal binding protein‐histone deacetylase complex , 1998, FEBS letters.

[34]  E. Steingrímsson,et al.  Dual role of the Drosophila pattern gene tailless in embryonic termini. , 1991, Science.

[35]  M. Levine,et al.  Interactions between dorsal and helix-loop-helix proteins initiate the differentiation of the embryonic mesoderm and neuroectoderm in Drosophila. , 1993, Genes & development.

[36]  Robert J. Diaz,et al.  The Drosophila gene tailless is expressed at the embryonic termini and is a member of the steroid receptor superfamily , 1990, Cell.

[37]  H. Jäckle,et al.  Control of transcription by Krüppel through interactions with TFIIB and TFIIEβ , 1995, Nature.

[38]  M. Levine,et al.  Regulation of two pair-rule stripes by a single enhancer in the Drosophila embryo. , 1996, Developmental biology.

[39]  Kerstin Sollerbrant,et al.  The CtBP binding domain in the adenovirus E1A protein controls CR1- dependent transactivation , 1996, Nucleic Acids Res..

[40]  Stephen T. Crews,et al.  The Drosophila single-minded gene encodes a helix-loop-helix protein that acts as a master regulator of CNS midline development , 1991, Cell.

[41]  Stephen T. Crews,et al.  CNS midline enhancers of the Drosophila slit and Toll genes , 1993, Mechanisms of Development.

[42]  M. Levine,et al.  hairy mediates dominant repression in the Drosophila embryo , 1997, The EMBO journal.

[43]  M. Levine,et al.  Long-range repression in the Drosophila embryo. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  G. Jiménez,et al.  In vivo interactions of the Drosophila Hairy and Runt transcriptional repressors with target promoters. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[45]  W. Schaffner,et al.  Different activation domains stimulate transcription from remote (‘enhancer’) and proximal (‘promoter’) positions. , 1992, The EMBO journal.

[46]  H. Jäckle,et al.  From gradients to stripes in Drosophila embryogenesis: filling in the gaps. , 1996, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[47]  M. Levine,et al.  Regulation of a segmentation stripe by overlapping activators and repressors in the Drosophila embryo. , 1991, Science.

[48]  M. Levine,et al.  Short-range repression permits multiple enhancers to function autonomously within a complex promoter. , 1994, Genes & development.

[49]  J. M. Boyd,et al.  Molecular cloning and characterization of a cellular phosphoprotein that interacts with a conserved C-terminal domain of adenovirus E1A involved in negative modulation of oncogenic transformation. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.