Neuroimaging to assess safety and efficacy of AD therapies

During the last two decades, neuroimaging methods have become widely used to study the natural history of Alzheimer's disease and also as a means of assessing safety and efficacy of novel treatments. Widely used safety and efficacy end points are described, along with their level of maturity. The North American Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), and similar activities in Europe, Japan, and Australia, are natural history studies that are providing new insights into the use of imaging end points in clinical trials. While the results of these trials are not yet all available, a recipe for successful deployment of imaging to assess eligibility, safety and efficacy is emerging.

[1]  Truman R Brown,et al.  Imaging the Abeta-related neurotoxicity of Alzheimer disease. , 2007, Archives of neurology.

[2]  Adam M. Brickman,et al.  Imaging the Aβ-Related Neurotoxicity of Alzheimer Disease , 2007 .

[3]  W. Klunk,et al.  Imaging brain amyloid in Alzheimer's disease with Pittsburgh Compound‐B , 2004, Annals of neurology.

[4]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Accurate, Robust, and Automated Longitudinal and Cross-Sectional Brain Change Analysis , 2002, NeuroImage.

[5]  Norbert Schuff,et al.  Deformation tensor morphometry of semantic dementia with quantitative validation , 2004, NeuroImage.

[6]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Cerebral atrophy measurements using Jacobian integration: Comparison with the boundary shift integral , 2006, NeuroImage.

[7]  C. Rowe,et al.  The Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) study of aging: methodology and baseline characteristics of 1112 individuals recruited for a longitudinal study of Alzheimer's disease , 2009, International Psychogeriatrics.

[8]  Michael W. Weiner,et al.  The pilot European Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative of the European Alzheimer's Disease Consortium , 2008, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[9]  B. Miller,et al.  11C-PIB PET imaging in Alzheimer disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration , 2007, Neurology.

[10]  Nick C Fox,et al.  Effects of Aβ immunization (AN1792) on MRI measures of cerebral volume in Alzheimer disease , 2005, Neurology.

[11]  A M Dale,et al.  Measuring the thickness of the human cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  C. Rowe,et al.  Imaging of amyloid β in Alzheimer's disease with 18F-BAY94-9172, a novel PET tracer: proof of mechanism , 2008, The Lancet Neurology.

[13]  Nick C Fox,et al.  Visualisation and quantification of rates of atrophy in Alzheimer's disease , 1996, The Lancet.

[14]  C. DeCarli,et al.  FDG-PET improves accuracy in distinguishing frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease. , 2007, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[15]  W. Klunk,et al.  Impact of amyloid imaging on drug development in Alzheimer's disease. , 2007, Nuclear medicine and biology.

[16]  Nick C Fox,et al.  The Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative (ADNI): MRI methods , 2008, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[17]  Nick C Fox,et al.  Brain atrophy progression measured from registered serial MRI: Validation and application to alzheimer's disease , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[18]  C. Jack,et al.  MRI as a biomarker of disease progression in a therapeutic trial of milameline for AD , 2003, Neurology.

[19]  Nick C Fox,et al.  Using serial registered brain magnetic resonance imaging to measure disease progression in Alzheimer disease: power calculations and estimates of sample size to detect treatment effects. , 2000, Archives of neurology.