Calibration-free coronary artery measurements for interventional device sizing using inverse geometry x-ray fluoroscopy: in vivo validation

Proper sizing of interventional devices to match coronary vessel dimensions improves procedural efficiency and therapeutic outcomes. We have developed a novel method using inverse geometry x-ray fluoroscopy to automatically determine vessel dimensions without the need for magnification calibration or optimal views. To validate this method in vivo, we compared results to intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in a healthy porcine model. Coronary angiography was performed using Scanning-Beam Digital X-ray (SBDX), an inverse geometry fluoroscopy system that performs multiplane digital x-ray tomosynthesis in real time. From a single frame, 3D reconstruction of the arteries was performed by localizing the depth of vessel lumen edges. The 3D model was used to directly calculate length and to determine the best imaging plane to use for diameter measurements, where outof- plane blur was minimized and the known pixel spacing was used to obtain absolute vessel diameter. End-diastolic length and diameter measurements were compared to measurements from CCTA and IVUS, respectively. For vessel segment lengths measuring 6 mm to 73 mm by CCTA, the SBDX length error was -0.49 ± 1.76 mm (SBDX - CCTA, mean ± 1 SD). For vessel diameters measuring 2.1 mm to 3.6 mm by IVUS, the SBDX diameter error was 0.07 ± 0.27 mm (SBDX - minimum IVUS diameter, mean ± 1 SD). The in vivo agreement between SBDX-based vessel sizing and gold standard techniques supports the feasibility of calibration-free coronary vessel sizing using inverse geometry x-ray fluoroscopy.

[1]  M. Jeong,et al.  Comparison of cardiac function and coronary angiography between conventional pigs and micropigs as measured by multidetector row computed tomography , 2008, Journal of veterinary science.

[2]  S. F. Lin,et al.  Influence of balloon size on initial success, acute complications, and restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A prospective randomized study. , 1988, Circulation.

[3]  G. Rubin,et al.  Coronary artery: quantitative evaluation of normal diameter determined with electron-beam CT compared with cine coronary angiography initial experience. , 2003, Radiology.

[4]  S. M. Collins,et al.  Automated analysis of coronary arterial morphology in cineangiograms: geometric and physiologic validation in humans. , 1989, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[5]  M. LeFree,et al.  Automated quantitative coronary arteriography: morphologic and physiologic validation in vivo of a rapid digital angiographic method. , 1987, Circulation.

[6]  F. Neumann,et al.  Original studies: Comparison of angiography and intravascular ultrasound for the assessment of lumen size after coronary stent placement: Impact of dilation pressures , 1997 .

[7]  Johan H. C. Reiber,et al.  Why and how should QCA systems be validated , 1994 .

[8]  C von Birgelen,et al.  Continued improvement of clinical outcome and cost effectiveness following intravascular ultrasound guided PCI: insights from a prospective, randomised study , 2003, Heart.

[9]  Filippo Cademartiri,et al.  Evaluation of Coronary Atherosclerosis by Multislice Computed Tomography in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Without Significant Coronary Artery Stenosis: A Comparative Study With Quantitative Coronary Angiography , 2008, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[10]  J. Reiber,et al.  A novel approach for the detection of pathlines in X-Ray angiograms: the wavefront propagation algorithm , 2002, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[11]  N. Weissman,et al.  Predictors of Subacute Stent Thrombosis: Results of a Systematic Intravascular Ultrasound Study , 2003, Circulation.

[12]  P D Verdouw,et al.  In-vivo validation of on-line and off-line geometric coronary measurements using insertion of stenosis phantoms in porcine coronary arteries. , 1992, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[13]  Demetri Terzopoulos,et al.  Snakes: Active contour models , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[14]  J. J. Gerbrands,et al.  Coronary Artery Dimensions from Cineangiograms-Methodology and Validation of a Computer-Assisted Analysis Procedure , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  Ji Yong Choi,et al.  Assessment of three dimensional quantitative coronary analysis by using rotational angiography for measurement of vessel length and diameter , 2011, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[16]  Jamshid Dehmeshki,et al.  Medical Image Segmentation Using Deformable Models and Local Fitting Binary , 2011 .

[17]  S. Molloi,et al.  Absolute cross-sectional area measurements in quantitative coronary arteriography by dual-energy DSA. , 1991, Investigative radiology.

[18]  J. Wildberger,et al.  Multidetector-row computed tomography vs. angiography and intravascular ultrasound for the evaluation of the diameter of proximal coronary arteries. , 2006, International journal of cardiology.

[19]  P. Fitzgerald,et al.  Vessel tearing at the edge of intracoronary stents detected with intravascular ultrasound imaging. , 1997, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[20]  Stéphane G Carlier,et al.  Clinical researchInterventional cardiologyStent underexpansion and residual reference segment stenosis are related to stent thrombosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: An intravascular ultrasound study , 2005 .

[21]  H. Gewirtz,et al.  Production of a critical coronary arterial stenosis in closed chest laboratory animals. Description of a new nonsurgical method based on standard cardiac catheterization techniques. , 1981, The American journal of cardiology.

[22]  M Siebes,et al.  Sources of error in quantitative coronary angiography. , 1993, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[23]  H De Geest,et al.  Intravascular ultrasound versus angiography for measurement of luminal diameters in normal and diseased coronary arteries. , 1994, American heart journal.

[24]  M M Bodenheimer,et al.  Quantitation of absolute area of a coronary arterial stenosis: experimental validation with a preparation in vivo. , 1986, Circulation.

[25]  Xiaochuan Pan,et al.  Enhanced imaging of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis through improved image-reconstruction algorithms. , 2009, Medical physics.

[26]  J. Liénard,et al.  Parameters that influence accuracy and precision of quantitative coronary arteriography , 1996, The International Journal of Cardiac Imaging.

[27]  Michael A Speidel,et al.  Comparison of entrance exposure and signal-to-noise ratio between an SBDX prototype and a wide-beam cardiac angiographic system. , 2006, Medical physics.

[28]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  A fast poly-energetic iterative FBP algorithm , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[29]  James G. Colsher,et al.  Iterative three-dimensional image reconstruction from tomographic projections , 1977 .

[30]  James T Dobbins,et al.  Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[31]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  An efficient polyenergetic SART (pSART) reconstruction algorithm for quantitative myocardial CT perfusion. , 2014, Medical physics.

[32]  C. Di Mario,et al.  Stented segment length as an independent predictor of restenosis. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[33]  C. Haudenschild,et al.  Influence of inflation pressure and balloon size on the development of intimal hyperplasia after balloon angioplasty. A study in the atherosclerotic rabbit. , 1989, Circulation.

[34]  F. Sera,et al.  Optimal stent-sizing with intravascular ultrasound contributes to complete neointimal coverage after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation assessed by angioscopy. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[35]  Francis K. H. Quek,et al.  Vessel extraction in medical images by wave-propagation and traceback , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[36]  M. Sivananthan,et al.  Assessment of coronary stent deployment using computer enhanced x‐ray images‐validation against intravascular ultrasound and best practice recommendations , 2013, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[37]  James G. Nagy,et al.  Numerical Algorithms for Polyenergetic Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Reconstruction , 2010, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[38]  Michael A Speidel,et al.  Calibration-free device sizing using an inverse geometry x-ray system. , 2010, Medical physics.

[39]  C. Grines,et al.  Application of a new phased-array ultrasound imaging catheter in the assessment of vascular dimensions. In vivo comparison to cineangiography. , 1990, Circulation.

[40]  Comparison of simultaneously performed digital and film-based angiography in assessment of coronary artery disease. , 1988, Circulation.

[41]  N. Bom,et al.  Semi-automatic contour detection for volumetric quantification of intracoronary ultrasound , 1994, Computers in Cardiology 1994.

[42]  Peter Niederer,et al.  Quantitative Coronary Arteriography , 1991, Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine.

[43]  Ioannis A. Kakadiaris,et al.  Image-Based Gating of Intravascular Ultrasound Pullback Sequences , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[44]  Michael A Speidel,et al.  Scanning-beam digital x-ray (SBDX) technology for interventional and diagnostic cardiac angiography. , 2006, Medical physics.

[45]  R A Kruger,et al.  Quantitative digital subtraction coronary angiography using videodensitometry. An in vivo analysis. , 1988, Investigative radiology.

[46]  J. Tobis,et al.  Angiographic and intravascular ultrasound predictors of in-stent restenosis. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[47]  C. Mistretta,et al.  Geometric quantitative coronary arteriography. A comparison of unsubtracted and dual energy-subtracted images. , 1991, Investigative radiology.

[48]  Jae S. Lim,et al.  A new method for estimation of coronary artery dimensions in angiograms , 1988, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[49]  Michael A. Speidel,et al.  Monoplane stereoscopic imaging method for inverse geometry x-ray fluoroscopy , 2013, Medical Imaging.

[50]  C J Slager,et al.  Morphometric analysis in three-dimensional intracoronary ultrasound: an in vitro and in vivo study performed with a novel system for the contour detection of lumen and plaque. , 1996, American heart journal.

[51]  P. Yock,et al.  Intravascular ultrasound: novel pathophysiological insights and current clinical applications. , 2001, Circulation.

[52]  Habib Samady,et al.  Contemporary clinical applications of coronary intravascular ultrasound. , 2011, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[53]  M. Nobuyoshi,et al.  Impact of multiple and long sirolimus-eluting stent implantation on 3-year clinical outcomes in the j-Cypher Registry. , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[54]  P D Esser,et al.  Quantification of relative coronary arterial stenosis by cinevideodensitometric analysis of coronary arteriograms. , 1984, Circulation.

[55]  F. Eberli,et al.  Impact of stent overlap on angiographic and long-term clinical outcome in patients undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[56]  F J Pinto,et al.  Intravascular ultrasound imaging of angiographically normal coronary arteries: an in vivo comparison with quantitative angiography. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[57]  J. Reiber,et al.  Advanced contour detection for three-dimensional intracoronary ultrasound: a validation – in vitro and in vivo , 2002, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.