MR imaging of the prostate at 3 Tesla: comparison of an external phased-array coil to imaging with an endorectal coil at 1.5 Tesla.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES To qualitatively compare the image quality of torso phased-array 3-Tesla (3T) imaging of the prostate with that of endorectal 1.5-Tesla imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty cases of torso phased-array prostate imaging performed at 3-Tesla with FSE T2 weighted images were evaluated by two readers independently for visualization of the posterior border (PB), seminal vesicles (SV), neurovascular bundles (NVB), and image quality rating (IQR). Studies were performed at large fields of view(FOV) (25 cm) (14 cases) (3TL) and smaller FOV (14 cm) (19 cases) (3TS). A comparison was made to 20 consecutive cases of 1.5-T endorectal evaluation performed during the same time period.Results. 3TL produced a significantly better image quality compared with the small FOV for PB (P = .0001), SV (P =.0001), and IQR (P = .0001). There was a marginally significant difference within the NVB category (P = .0535). 3TL produced an image of similar quality to image quality at 1.5 T for PB (P = .3893), SV (P = .8680), NB (P = .2684), and IQR (P = .8599). CONCLUSION Prostate image quality at 3T with a torso phased-array coil can be comparable with that of endorectal 1.5-T imaging. These findings suggest that additional options are now available for magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate gland.

[1]  J Kurhanewicz,et al.  The prostate: MR imaging and spectroscopy. Present and future. , 2000 .

[2]  Krebs Tl,et al.  MR imaging of prostate cancer. , 2000 .

[3]  Silvia D. Chang,et al.  Prostate cancer tumor volume: measurement with endorectal MR and MR spectroscopic imaging. , 2002, Radiology.

[4]  K. Badani,et al.  Prospective evaluation of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging to detect tumor foci in men with prior negative prostastic biopsy: a pilot study. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[5]  Xavier Buy,et al.  Contrast enhanced color Doppler endorectal sonography of prostate: efficiency for detecting peripheral zone tumors and role for biopsy procedure. , 2003, The Journal of urology.

[6]  P. Carroll,et al.  Three-dimensional H-1 MR spectroscopic imaging of the in situ human prostate with high (0.24-0.7-cm3) spatial resolution. , 1996, Radiology.

[7]  J Kurhanewicz,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopic imaging of prostate cancer. , 2003, Cancer investigation.

[8]  Jelle O. Barentsz,et al.  Local staging of prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging: a meta-analysis , 2002, European Radiology.

[9]  N. Rofsky,et al.  MR imaging relaxation times of abdominal and pelvic tissues measured in vivo at 3.0 T: preliminary results. , 2004, Radiology.

[10]  R E Lenkinski,et al.  Prostate: MR imaging with an endorectal surface coil. , 1989, Radiology.

[11]  R. Menon,et al.  Comparison of the quantification precision of human short echo time 1H spectroscopy at 1.5 and 4.0 Tesla , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  J Kurhanewicz,et al.  Sextant localization of prostate cancer: comparison of sextant biopsy, magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging with step section histology. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[13]  Nobuhiko Hata,et al.  Quantitative MR imaging assessment of prostate gland deformation before and during MR imaging-guided brachytherapy. , 2002, Academic radiology.

[14]  M. Rifkin,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Prostate Cancer: Update , 1995, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[15]  J R Thornbury,et al.  Prostate cancer staging: should MR imaging be used?--A decision analytic approach. , 2000, Radiology.

[16]  Yu-Chung N. Cheng,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Physical Principles and Sequence Design , 1999 .

[17]  G S Karczmar,et al.  A new method for imaging perfusion and contrast extraction fraction: Input functions derived from reference tissues , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[18]  L. Turnbull,et al.  A simple method for the correction of endorectal surface coil inhomogeneity in prostate imaging , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[19]  R E Lenkinski,et al.  Prostate cancer: local staging with endorectal surface coil MR imaging. , 1991, Radiology.