Ocean FAIR Data Services

Well-founded data management systems are of vital importance for ocean observing systems as they ensure that essential data are not only collected but also retained and made accessible for analysis and application by current and future users. Effective data management requires collaboration across activities including observations, metadata and data assembly, quality assurance and control (QA/QC), and data publication that enables local and interoperable discovery and access and secures archiving that guarantees long-term preservation. To achieve this, data should be findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable (FAIR). Here, we outline how these principles apply to ocean data and illustrate them with a few examples. In recent decades, ocean data managers, in close collaboration with international organizations, have played an active role in the improvement of environmental data standardization, accessibility, and interoperability through different projects, enhancing access to observation data at all stages of the data life cycle and fostering the development of integrated services targeted to research, regulatory, and operational users. As ocean observing systems evolve and an increasing number of autonomous platforms and sensors are deployed, the volume and variety of data increase dramatically. For instance, there are more than 70 data catalogs that contain metadata records for the polar oceans, a situation that makes comprehensive data discovery beyond the capacity of most researchers. To better serve research, operational, and commercial users, more efficient turnaround of quality data in known formats and made available through Web services is necessary. In particular, automation of data workflows will be critical to reduce friction throughout the data value chain. Adhering to the FAIR principles with free, timely, and unrestricted access to ocean observation data is beneficial for the originators, has obvious benefits for users, and is an essential foundation for the development of new services made possible with big data technologies.

[1]  Richard A. Feely,et al.  A global ocean carbon climatology: Results from Global Data Analysis Project (GLODAP) , 2004 .

[2]  R. Elizabeth Griffin,et al.  When are Old Data New Data , 2015 .

[3]  Timothy Clark,et al.  The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship (vol 15, 160018, 2016) , 2019 .

[4]  Horst Bornemann,et al.  Marine mammals exploring the oceans pole to pole: a review of the MEOP Consortium , 2017 .

[5]  Andrew Woolf,et al.  Data management for the ocean sciences - perspectives for the next decade , 2010 .

[6]  Julie Thomas,et al.  Evolving and Sustaining Ocean Best Practices and Standards for the Next Decade , 2019, Front. Mar. Sci..

[7]  Masao Ishii,et al.  The Global Ocean Data Analysis Project version 2 (GLODAPv2) – an internally consistent data product for the world ocean , 2016 .

[8]  P. Poli,et al.  The Joint IOC (of UNESCO) and WMO Collaborative Effort for Met-Ocean Services , 2019, Front. Mar. Sci..

[9]  Erik Schultes,et al.  A design framework and exemplar metrics for FAIRness , 2017 .

[10]  Roger Proctor,et al.  Australia’s continental-scale acoustic tracking database and its automated quality control process , 2018, Scientific Data.

[11]  Ana Lara-Lopez,et al.  Australia’s Integrated Marine Observing System (IMOS): data impacts and lessons learned , 2016 .

[12]  Thierry Carval,et al.  On the Future of Argo: A Global, Full-Depth, Multi-Disciplinary Array , 2019, Front. Mar. Sci..

[13]  Richard P. Signell,et al.  From the Oceans to the Cloud: Opportunities and Challenges for Data, Models, Computation and Workflows , 2019, Front. Mar. Sci..

[14]  Quillon Harpham,et al.  The European Marine Observation and Data Network (EMODnet): Visions and Roles of the Gateway to Marine Data in Europe , 2019, Front. Mar. Sci..

[15]  Simon Jirka,et al.  Ocean Data Product Integration Through Innovation-The Next Level of Data Interoperability , 2019, Front. Mar. Sci..

[16]  Iain Shepherd,et al.  European efforts to make marine data more accessible , 2018, Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics.

[17]  Robert P. Guralnick,et al.  The development of the data system and growth in data sharing , 2010 .

[18]  Sylvie Pouliquen,et al.  Ocean data dissemination: new challenges for data integration , 2010 .

[19]  Yves Ducq,et al.  Model-based approaches for interoperability of next generation enterprise information systems: state of the art and future challenges , 2016, Information Systems and e-Business Management.

[20]  Rob W.W. Hooft,et al.  The value of data , 2011, Nature Genetics.

[21]  Jay Pearlman,et al.  Advancing Marine Biological Observations and Data Requirements of the Complementary Essential Ocean Variables (EOVs) and Essential Biodiversity Variables (EBVs) Frameworks , 2018, Front. Mar. Sci..

[22]  Oscar Schofield,et al.  The vision for a Southern Ocean Observing System , 2013 .

[23]  J. Kocik,et al.  Aquatic animal telemetry: A panoramic window into the underwater world , 2015, Science.

[24]  Cj Beegle-Krause,et al.  Ocean and coastal data management , 2010 .

[25]  Øystein Godøy,et al.  The State of Polar Data–the IPY Experience , 2011 .

[26]  Martin Edwards,et al.  An Integrated All-Atlantic Ocean Observing System in 2030 , 2019, Front. Mar. Sci..

[27]  Jacqueline Boutin,et al.  A uniform, quality controlled Surface Ocean CO2 Atlas (SOCAT) , 2012 .

[28]  Erik Schultes,et al.  The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship , 2016, Scientific Data.

[29]  Dennis Gannon,et al.  Workflows for e-Science, Scientific Workflows for Grids , 2014 .