Difference in Visual Processing Assessed by Eye Vergence Movements

Orienting visual attention is closely linked to the oculomotor system. For example, a shift of attention is usually followed by a saccadic eye movement and can be revealed by micro saccades. Recently we reported a novel role of another type of eye movement, namely eye vergence, in orienting visual attention. Shifts in visuospatial attention are characterized by the response modulation to a selected target. However, unlike (micro-) saccades, eye vergence movements do not carry spatial information (except for depth) and are thus not specific to a particular visual location. To further understand the role of eye vergence in visual attention, we tested subjects with different perceptual styles. Perceptual style refers to the characteristic way individuals perceive environmental stimuli, and is characterized by a spatial difference (local vs. global) in perceptual processing. We tested field independent (local; FI) and field dependent (global; FD) observers in a cue/no-cue task and a matching task. We found that FI observers responded faster and had stronger modulation in eye vergence in both tasks than FD subjects. The results may suggest that eye vergence modulation may relate to the trade-off between the size of spatial region covered by attention and the processing efficiency of sensory information. Alternatively, vergence modulation may have a role in the switch in cortical state to prepare the visual system for new incoming sensory information. In conclusion, vergence eye movements may be added to the growing list of functions of fixational eye movements in visual perception. However, further studies are needed to elucidate its role.

[1]  Elias Tsakanikos Associative learning and perceptual style : Are associated events perceived analytically or as a whole? , 2006 .

[2]  H. T. Clark,et al.  Field Dependence and Strategy Use , 1988 .

[3]  Victor A. F. Lamme,et al.  Source (or Part of the following Source): Type Article Title Internal State of Monkey Primary Visual Cortex (v1) Predicts Figure Ground Perception Author(s) Internal State of Monkey Primary Visual Cortex (v1) Predicts Figure–ground Perception Materials and Methods , 2022 .

[4]  Michael C. Pyryt Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor analytic studies , 1998 .

[5]  M. Rucci,et al.  Contributions of fixational eye movements to the discrimination of briefly presented stimuli. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[6]  J. Burton,et al.  Hypermedia concepts and research: an overview , 1995 .

[7]  Xoana G. Troncoso,et al.  Microsaccades Counteract Visual Fading during Fixation , 2005, Neuron.

[8]  Katherine M. Armstrong,et al.  Visual and oculomotor selection: links, causes and implications for spatial attention , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  U. Frrrh Autism: explaining the enigma , 1989 .

[11]  J. Amador,et al.  Relaciones entre las dimensiones de dependencia-independencia de campo introversión-extraversión y tiempos de reacción , 1990 .

[12]  Leandro S Almeida,et al.  Field dependence-independence (FDI) cognitive style: an analysis of attentional functioning. , 2007, Psicothema.

[13]  M. J. Emerson,et al.  Field dependence–independence from a working memory perspective: A dual-task investigation of the Hidden Figures Test , 2001, Memory.

[14]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  Microsaccades Keep the Eyes' Balance During Fixation , 2004, Psychological science.

[15]  James J. Clark,et al.  Microsaccades as an overt measure of covert attention shifts , 2002, Vision Research.

[16]  Arno Villringer,et al.  A Physiological Correlate of the “Zoom Lens” of Visual Attention , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  Microsaccades uncover the orientation of covert attention , 2003, Vision Research.

[18]  J. A. Amador-Campos,et al.  Correlations among Scores on Measures of Field Dependence-Independence Cognitive Style, Cognitive Ability, and Sustained Attention , 1999, Perceptual and motor skills.

[19]  Marcin Szczerbinski,et al.  Global and local perceptual style, field-independence, and central coherence: An attempt at concept validation. , 2009, Advances in cognitive psychology.

[20]  Hans Supèr,et al.  A Role of Eye Vergence in Covert Attention , 2013, PloS one.

[21]  J. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Mental-attentional capacity: does cognitive style make a difference? , 1998, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[22]  F. Cadaveira,et al.  Field Dependence-Independence and Brain Organization: The Confluence of Two Different Ways of Describing General Forms of Cognitive Functioning? A Theoretical Review , 1993, Perceptual and motor skills.

[23]  Utilidad del Children´s Embedded Figures Test en el Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad , 2010 .

[24]  D. LaBerge Spatial extent of attention to letters and words. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  H. Collewijn,et al.  Control of vergence: Gating among disparity inputs by voluntary target selection , 1991, Experimental Brain Research.

[26]  L. P. Zapata,et al.  Two stages of programming eye gaze shifts in 3-D space , 2013, Vision Research.

[27]  J. Colombo,et al.  Individual differences in infant visual attention: are short lookers faster processors or feature processors? , 1991, Child development.

[28]  Juan Pascual-Leone,et al.  Event-related potentials index cognitive style differences during a serial-order recall task. , 2002, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[29]  Aymeric Guillot,et al.  Relationship Between Spatial Abilities, Mental Rotation and Functional Anatomy Learning , 2007, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[30]  M. Rucci,et al.  Microsaccades Precisely Relocate Gaze in a High Visual Acuity Task , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.