Semiparametric methods for estimation of a nonlinear exposure‐outcome relationship using instrumental variables with application to Mendelian randomization

Mendelian randomization, the use of genetic variants as instrumental variables (IV), can test for and estimate the causal effect of an exposure on an outcome. Most IV methods assume that the function relating the exposure to the expected value of the outcome (the exposure‐outcome relationship) is linear. However, in practice, this assumption may not hold. Indeed, often the primary question of interest is to assess the shape of this relationship. We present two novel IV methods for investigating the shape of the exposure‐outcome relationship: a fractional polynomial method and a piecewise linear method. We divide the population into strata using the exposure distribution, and estimate a causal effect, referred to as a localized average causal effect (LACE), in each stratum of population. The fractional polynomial method performs metaregression on these LACE estimates. The piecewise linear method estimates a continuous piecewise linear function, the gradient of which is the LACE estimate in each stratum. Both methods were demonstrated in a simulation study to estimate the true exposure‐outcome relationship well, particularly when the relationship was a fractional polynomial (for the fractional polynomial method) or was piecewise linear (for the piecewise linear method). The methods were used to investigate the shape of relationship of body mass index with systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure.

[1]  N. Timpson,et al.  Using published data in Mendelian randomization: a blueprint for efficient identification of causal risk factors , 2015, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[2]  S. Thompson,et al.  Mendelian Randomization , 2015 .

[3]  P. Elliott,et al.  UK Biobank: An Open Access Resource for Identifying the Causes of a Wide Range of Complex Diseases of Middle and Old Age , 2015, PLoS medicine.

[4]  Ross M. Fraser,et al.  Genetic studies of body mass index yield new insights for obesity biology , 2015, Nature.

[5]  Dylan S. Small,et al.  Commentary: Interpretation and sensitivity analysis for the localized average causal effect curve. , 2014, Epidemiology.

[6]  S. Thompson,et al.  Instrumental Variable Analysis with a Nonlinear Exposure–Outcome Relationship , 2014, Epidemiology.

[7]  D. Lawlor,et al.  Testing for non-linear causal effects using a binary genotype in a Mendelian randomization study: application to alcohol and cardiovascular traits , 2014, International journal of epidemiology.

[8]  P. Poirier,et al.  Blood pressure assessment in severe obesity: Validation of a forearm approach , 2013, Obesity.

[9]  A. Butterworth,et al.  Mendelian Randomization Analysis With Multiple Genetic Variants Using Summarized Data , 2013, Genetic epidemiology.

[10]  S. Thompson,et al.  Use of allele scores as instrumental variables for Mendelian randomization , 2013, International journal of epidemiology.

[11]  K. Flegal,et al.  Association of All-Cause Mortality With Overweight and Obesity Using Standard Body Mass Index Categories , 2012 .

[12]  Kenny Q. Ye,et al.  An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes , 2012, Nature.

[13]  Ruth H. Keogh,et al.  Effects of Classical Exposure Measurement Error on the Shape of Exposure-Disease Associations , 2012 .

[14]  S. Thompson,et al.  Bias in causal estimates from Mendelian randomization studies with weak instruments , 2011, Statistics in medicine.

[15]  J. Horowitz Applied Nonparametric Instrumental Variables Estimation , 2011 .

[16]  M. Yousefifard,et al.  The Relation of Body Mass Index and Blood Pressure in Iranian Children and Adolescents Aged 7–18 Years Old , 2010, Iranian journal of public health.

[17]  S. Ebrahim,et al.  Mendelian randomization: can genetic epidemiology help redress the failures of observational epidemiology? , 2008, Human Genetics.

[18]  N. Sheehan,et al.  Mendelian randomization as an instrumental variable approach to causal inference , 2007, Statistical methods in medical research.

[19]  D. Lawlor,et al.  Re: Estimation of bias in nongenetic observational studies using "Mendelian triangulation" by Bautista et al. , 2007, Annals of epidemiology.

[20]  J. Robins,et al.  Instruments for Causal Inference: An Epidemiologist's Dream? , 2006, Epidemiology.

[21]  Raymond J. Carroll,et al.  Measurement error in nonlinear models: a modern perspective , 2006 .

[22]  Piero Quatto,et al.  Flexible meta-regression functions for modeling aggregate dose-response data, with an application to alcohol and mortality. , 2004, American journal of epidemiology.

[23]  W. Newey,et al.  Instrumental variable estimation of nonparametric models , 2003 .

[24]  L. Andersen,et al.  The association between high blood pressure, physical fitness, and body mass index in adolescents. , 2003, Preventive medicine.

[25]  Lars Peter Hansen,et al.  Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Theory and Applications, Eighth World Congress , 2003 .

[26]  R. Little,et al.  Inference for the Complier-Average Causal Effect From Longitudinal Data Subject to Noncompliance and Missing Data, With Application to a Job Training Assessment for the Unemployed , 2001 .

[27]  P Royston,et al.  The use of fractional polynomials to model continuous risk variables in epidemiology. , 1999, International journal of epidemiology.

[28]  S. Sharp,et al.  Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods. , 1997, Statistics in medicine.

[29]  A. Luke,et al.  Relationship between blood pressure and body mass index in lean populations. , 1997, Hypertension.

[30]  David M. Kreps,et al.  Advances In Economics and Econometrics: Theory And Applications: Seventh World Congress , 1997 .

[31]  P. Royston,et al.  Regression using fractional polynomials of continuous covariates: parsimonious parametric modelling. , 1994 .

[32]  Joshua D. Angrist,et al.  Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables , 1993 .

[33]  J. Angrist,et al.  Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects , 1994 .