The Domain-General Multiple Demand (MD) Network Does Not Support Core Aspects of Language Comprehension: A Large-Scale fMRI Investigation

Aside from the language-selective left-lateralized fronto-temporal network, language comprehension sometimes additionally recruits a domain-general bilateral fronto-parietal network implicated in executive functions: the multiple demand (MD) network. However, the nature of the MD network’s contributions to language comprehension remains debated. To illuminate the role of this network in language processing, we conducted a large-scale fMRI investigation using data from 30 diverse word and sentence comprehension experiments (481 unique participants, 678 scanning sessions). In line with prior findings, the MD network was active during many language tasks. Moreover, similar to the language-selective network, which is robustly lateralized to the left hemisphere, these responses were stronger in the left-hemisphere MD regions. However, in stark contrast with the language-selective network, the MD network responded more strongly (i) to lists of unconnected words than to sentences, and critically, (ii) in paradigms with an explicit task compared to passive comprehension paradigms. In fact, many passive comprehension tasks failed to elicit a response above the fixation baseline in the MD network, in contrast to strong responses in the language-selective network. In tandem, these results argue against a role for the MD network in core aspects of sentence comprehension like inhibiting irrelevant meanings or parses, keeping intermediate representations active in working memory, or predicting upcoming words or structures. These results align with recent evidence of relatively poor tracking of the linguistic signal by the MD regions during naturalistic comprehension, and instead suggest that the MD network’s engagement during language processing likely reflects effort associated with extraneous task demands. Significance Statement Domain-general executive processes, like working memory and cognitive control, have long been implicated in language comprehension, including in neuroimaging studies that have reported activation in domain-general multiple demand (MD) regions for linguistic manipulations. However, much prior evidence has come from paradigms where language interpretation is accompanied by extraneous tasks. Using a large fMRI dataset (30 experiments/481 participants/678 sessions), we demonstrate that MD regions are engaged during language comprehension in the presence of task demands, but not during passive reading/listening—conditions that strongly activate the fronto-temporal language network. These results present a fundamental challenge to proposals whereby linguistic computations, like inhibiting irrelevant meanings, keeping representations active in working memory, or predicting upcoming elements, draw on domain-general executive resources.

[1]  Richard Futrell,et al.  L2 processing as noisy channel language comprehension , 2016, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[2]  S. E C T I O N A Systems Perspective , 2022 .

[3]  James C. Gee,et al.  Resolving sentence ambiguity with planning and working memory resources: Evidence from fMRI , 2007, NeuroImage.

[4]  Evie Vergauwe,et al.  Do Mental Processes Share a Domain-General Resource? , 2010, Psychological science.

[5]  Liina Pylkkänen,et al.  Bilingual Language Switching in the Laboratory versus in the Wild: The Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Adaptive Language Control , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  New method for fMRI investigations of language: defining ROIs functionally in individual subjects. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  L. Shuster,et al.  An fMRI investigation of covertly and overtly produced mono- and multisyllabic words , 2005, Brain and Language.

[8]  A. Dale,et al.  Distinct Patterns of Neural Modulation during the Processing of Conceptual and Syntactic Anomalies , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  C. Honey,et al.  Hierarchical process memory: memory as an integral component of information processing , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  M. Raichle,et al.  On the existence of a generalized non-specific task-dependent network , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[11]  Emily B. Myers,et al.  The role of the left inferior frontal gyrus in implicit semantic competition and selection: An event-related fMRI study , 2008, Brain Research.

[12]  Evelina Fedorenko,et al.  Discourse-level comprehension engages medial frontal Theory of Mind brain regions even for expository texts , 2018, Language, cognition and neuroscience.

[13]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  Retrieval and unification of syntactic structure in sentence comprehension: an FMRI study using word-category ambiguity. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[14]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Sentence production: from mind to mouth , 1995 .

[15]  Guy B. Williams,et al.  Progressive non-fluent aphasia is associated with hypometabolism centred on the left anterior insula. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[16]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  Speech recognition in adverse conditions: A review , 2012 .

[17]  Robin Clark,et al.  Converging Evidence for the Processing Costs Associated with Ambiguous Quantifier Comprehension , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[18]  Albert Costa,et al.  Tracking lexical access in speech production: electrophysiological correlates of word frequency and cognate effects. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[19]  C. Francks,et al.  Gene Expression Correlates of the Cortical Network Underlying Sentence Processing , 2018, bioRxiv.

[20]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  Computational principles of working memory in sentence comprehension , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[21]  Jong Kyoung Kim,et al.  Speech recognition , 1983, 1983 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference. Digest of Technical Papers.

[22]  Randall Hendrick,et al.  Memory-Load Interference in Syntactic Processing , 2002, Psychological science.

[23]  William Schuler,et al.  Broad-Coverage Parsing Using Human-Like Memory Constraints , 2010, CL.

[24]  Evelina Fedorenko,et al.  A new fun and robust version of an fMRI localizer for the frontotemporal language system , 2017, Cognitive neuroscience.

[25]  J. Peelle Listening Effort: How the Cognitive Consequences of Acoustic Challenge Are Reflected in Brain and Behavior , 2017, Ear and hearing.

[26]  William Schuler,et al.  fMRI reveals language-specific predictive coding during naturalistic sentence comprehension , 2020, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  The Role of Human Parietal Area 7A as a Link between Sequencing in Hand Actions and in Overt Speech Production , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[28]  J. Duncan,et al.  Common regions of the human frontal lobe recruited by diverse cognitive demands , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[29]  Jordan Grafman,et al.  Discourse production following injury to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  Neuroimaging of Language: Why Hasn't a Clearer Picture Emerged? , 2009, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[31]  Evelina Fedorenko,et al.  Composition is the Core Driver of the Language-selective Network , 2020, Neurobiology of Language.

[32]  Evelina Fedorenko,et al.  Lack of selectivity for syntax relative to word meanings throughout the language network , 2018, Cognition.

[33]  Jack L. Gallant,et al.  The Representation of Semantic Information Across Human Cerebral Cortex During Listening Versus Reading Is Invariant to Stimulus Modality , 2019, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  Walter Schneider,et al.  The cognitive control network: Integrated cortical regions with dissociable functions , 2007, NeuroImage.

[35]  J. Ziegler,et al.  The Feedback Consistency Effect in Lexical Decision and Naming , 1997 .

[36]  Evelina Fedorenko,et al.  A robust dissociation among the language, multiple demand, and default mode networks: Evidence from inter-region correlations in effect size , 2017, Neuropsychologia.

[37]  Line Burholt Kristensen,et al.  The interface between language and attention: prosodic focus marking recruits a general attention network in spoken language comprehension. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[38]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  Toward a universal decoder of linguistic meaning from brain activation , 2018, Nature Communications.

[39]  Elizabeth Jefferies,et al.  Different impairments of semantic cognition in semantic dementia and semantic aphasia: evidence from the non-verbal domain. , 2009, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[40]  Evelina Fedorenko,et al.  Domain-General Brain Regions Do Not Track Linguistic Input as Closely as Language-Selective Regions , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  J. Kleim Neural plasticity and neurorehabilitation: teaching the new brain old tricks. , 2011, Journal of communication disorders.

[42]  W. Levelt,et al.  The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components , 2004, Cognition.

[43]  M. Just,et al.  Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory , 1991 .

[44]  Tijana Simic,et al.  Baseline executive control ability and its relationship to language therapy improvements in post-stroke aphasia: a systematic review , 2019, Neuropsychological rehabilitation.

[45]  E. Miller,et al.  An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[46]  Robert Leech,et al.  Domain-general subregions of the medial prefrontal cortex contribute to recovery of language after stroke , 2017, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[47]  Jefferson E. Roy,et al.  Representation of Multiple, Independent Categories in the Primate Prefrontal Cortex , 2010, Neuron.

[48]  David J. Freedman,et al.  Categorical representation of visual stimuli in the primate prefrontal cortex. , 2001, Science.

[49]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  Hierarchical Processing for Speech in Human Auditory Cortex and Beyond , 2010, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[50]  Manuel Carreiras,et al.  Brain regions that process case: Evidence from basque , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[51]  Evelina Fedorenko,et al.  Broca’s Area Is Not a Natural Kind , 2020, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[52]  Irene P. Kan,et al.  A case for conflict across multiple domains: Memory and language impairments following damage to ventrolateral prefrontal cortex , 2009, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[53]  Patti Adank,et al.  The neural bases of difficult speech comprehension and speech production: Two Activation Likelihood Estimation (ALE) meta-analyses , 2012, Brain and Language.

[54]  P. Hare Advance Online Publication , 2002, Nature Medicine.

[55]  Danielle S. Bassett,et al.  Functional Network Dynamics of the Language System , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[56]  Gregory Hickok,et al.  Neural correlates of word production stages delineated by parametric modulation of psycholinguistic variables , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[57]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Generalisability, Random Effects & Population Inference , 1998, NeuroImage.

[58]  Lorraine K Tyler,et al.  Language-related domain-specific and domain-general systems in the human brain , 2018, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences.

[59]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  Brain regions recruited for the effortful comprehension of noise-vocoded words , 2012 .

[60]  John Duncan,et al.  Fluid intelligence is supported by the multiple-demand system not the language system , 2018, Nature Human Behaviour.

[61]  S. Petersen,et al.  Brain Networks and Cognitive Architectures , 2015, Neuron.

[62]  M. Radanovic,et al.  Cognitive deficits in post-stroke aphasia. , 2015, Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria.

[63]  J. Duncan The multiple-demand (MD) system of the primate brain: mental programs for intelligent behaviour , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[64]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  Functional specificity for high-level linguistic processing in the human brain , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[65]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  A Temporal Bottleneck in the Language Comprehension Network , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[66]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  Effortful Listening: The Processing of Degraded Speech Depends Critically on Attention , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[67]  Evelina Fedorenko The role of domain-general cognitive control in language comprehension , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[68]  B McElree,et al.  Sentence Comprehension Is Mediated by Content-Addressable Memory Structures , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[69]  Jean-Luc Anton,et al.  Region of interest analysis using an SPM toolbox , 2010 .

[70]  Per B. Brockhoff,et al.  lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models , 2017 .

[71]  N. Shah,et al.  Top-down and bottom-up modulation of language related areas – An fMRI Study , 2003, BMC Neuroscience.

[72]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Functional Network Organization of the Human Brain , 2011, Neuron.

[73]  Robert Leech,et al.  Network dysfunction predicts speech production after left hemisphere stroke , 2016, Neurology.

[74]  Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al.  Less Skilled Readers Have Less Efficient Suppression Mechanisms , 1993, Psychological science.

[75]  S. Kiran,et al.  To what extent does attention underlie language in aphasia? , 2017 .

[76]  Richard J. S. Wise,et al.  Task-induced brain activity in aphasic stroke patients: what is driving recovery? , 2014, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[77]  K. Heilman,et al.  Hemispheric Differences in Ischemic Stroke: Is Left-Hemisphere Stroke More Common? , 2013, Journal of clinical neurology.

[78]  D. Moser,et al.  Sentence comprehension and general working memory , 2007, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[79]  B. Bussel,et al.  Longitudinal Study of Motor Recovery After Stroke: Recruitment and Focusing of Brain Activation , 2002, Stroke.

[80]  J. Duncan,et al.  The multiple-demand system but not the language system supports fluid intelligence. , 2018, Nature human behaviour.

[81]  Hironori Kumano,et al.  Context-Dependent Accumulation of Sensory Evidence in the Parietal Cortex Underlies Flexible Task Switching , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[82]  William Schuler,et al.  A Model of Language Processing as Hierarchic Sequential Prediction , 2013, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[83]  Evelina Fedorenko,et al.  Functionally distinct language and Theory of Mind networks are synchronized at rest and during language comprehension. , 2019, Journal of neurophysiology.

[84]  Sophie K. Scott,et al.  The neural processing of masked speech , 2013, Hearing Research.

[85]  Evelina Fedorenko,et al.  Activity in the fronto-parietal multiple-demand network is robustly associated with individual differences in working memory and fluid intelligence , 2020, Cortex.

[86]  V. Ferreira,et al.  Form Overrides Meaning When Bilinguals Monitor for Errors. , 2017, Journal of memory and language.

[87]  Mark Johnson,et al.  Memory requirements and local ambiguities of parsing strategies , 1991 .

[88]  Evelina Fedorenko,et al.  High-level language processing regions are not engaged in action observation or imitation. , 2018, Journal of neurophysiology.

[89]  Swathi Kiran,et al.  The Relationship between Frontotemporal Effective Connectivity during Picture Naming, Behavior, and Preserved Cortical Tissue in Chronic Aphasia , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[90]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[91]  Edward Gibson,et al.  The Nature of Working Memory in Linguistic, Arithmetic and Spatial Integration Processes. , 2007 .

[92]  Roel M. Willems,et al.  Grounding the neurobiology of language in first principles: The necessity of non-language-centric explanations for language comprehension , 2018, Cognition.

[93]  Albert Costa,et al.  Conscious intention to speak proactively facilitates lexical access during overt object naming. , 2011, Journal of memory and language.

[94]  Stefanie E. Kuchinsky,et al.  The Cingulo-Opercular Network Provides Word-Recognition Benefit , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[95]  S. Brownsett Using fMRI and Behavioural Measures to Investigate Rehabilitation in Post-Stroke Aphasic Deficits , 2013 .

[96]  Philip Resnik,et al.  Left-Corner Parsing and Psychological Plausibility , 1992, COLING.

[97]  Håkan Alm,et al.  THE USE OF CAR PHONES AND CHANGES IN DRIVER BEHAVIOUR , 2001 .

[98]  G. Waters,et al.  The Measurement of Verbal Working Memory Capacity and Its Relation to Reading Comprehension , 1996, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[99]  Anina N. Rich,et al.  Feature-selective Attention in Frontoparietal Cortex: Multivoxel Codes Adjust to Prioritize Task-relevant Information , 2017, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[100]  C. Weiller,et al.  Dynamics of language reorganization after left temporo-parietal and frontal stroke. , 2020, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[101]  Robert T. Knight,et al.  Effects of frontal lobe damage on interference effects in working memory , 2002, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[102]  Joshua K. Hartshorne,et al.  When Does Cognitive Functioning Peak? The Asynchronous Rise and Fall of Different Cognitive Abilities Across the Life Span , 2015, Psychological science.

[103]  Titus von der Malsburg,et al.  Incremental language comprehension difficulty predicts activity in the language network but not the multiple demand network , 2020, bioRxiv.

[104]  Evelina Fedorenko,et al.  An asymmetrical relationship between verbal and visual thinking: Converging evidence from behavior and fMRI , 2017, NeuroImage.

[105]  A. Roelofs,et al.  Attention Demands of Spoken Word Planning: A Review , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[106]  M. Just,et al.  Brain activation for reading and listening comprehension: An fMRI study of modality effects and individual differences in language comprehension. , 2009, Psychology & neuroscience.

[107]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Cortical representation of the constituent structure of sentences , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[108]  Sharon L. Thompson-Schill,et al.  Role of the left inferior frontal gyrus in covert word retrieval: Neural correlates of switching during verbal fluency , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[109]  Roger Levy,et al.  A noisy-channel model of rational human sentence comprehension under uncertain input , 2008, EMNLP 2008.

[110]  Steven G. Luke,et al.  Evaluating significance in linear mixed-effects models in R , 2016, Behavior Research Methods.

[111]  L. Cohen,et al.  The role of the supplementary motor area (SMA) in word production , 2006, Brain Research.

[112]  Evelina Fedorenko,et al.  Subject-specific functional localizers increase . . . , 2012 .

[113]  S. Petersen,et al.  Characterizing the Hemodynamic Response: Effects of Presentation Rate, Sampling Procedure, and the Possibility of Ordering Brain Activity Based on Relative Timing , 2000, NeuroImage.

[114]  Tomás Paus,et al.  Combining Functional Neuroimaging with Off-line Brain Stimulation: Modulation of Task-related Activity in Language Areas , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[115]  Matthew J. Traxler,et al.  Trends in syntactic parsing: anticipation, Bayesian estimation, and good-enough parsing , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[116]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  Neural correlate of the construction of sentence meaning , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[117]  Daniel N. Osherson,et al.  Thought Beyond Language , 2012, Psychological science.

[118]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Dissociating Linguistic and Task-related Activity in the Left Inferior Frontal Gyrus , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[119]  Roel M. Willems,et al.  On the other hand: including left-handers in cognitive neuroscience and neurogenetics , 2014, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[120]  R. Endo Realities, Rewards, and Risks of Heritage-Language Education: Perspectives from Japanese Immigrant Parents in a Midwestern Community , 2013 .

[121]  William Schuler,et al.  fMRI reveals language-specific predictive coding during naturalistic sentence comprehension , 2019, Neuropsychologia.

[122]  Stefan Heim,et al.  From a concept to a word in a syntactically complete sentence: An fMRI study on spontaneous language production in an overt picture description task , 2012, NeuroImage.

[123]  Jung Hwan Kim,et al.  Characterization of the hemodynamic response function across the majority of human cerebral cortex , 2018, NeuroImage.

[124]  Robert Leech,et al.  Cognitive control and its impact on recovery from aphasic stroke , 2013, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[125]  Christos Pliatsikas,et al.  Executive control in bilinguals: A concise review on fMRI studies. , 2016 .

[126]  D. Copland,et al.  Determining the Association between Language and Cognitive Tests in Poststroke Aphasia , 2017, Front. Neurol..

[127]  Katrin Amunts,et al.  A systems perspective on the effective connectivity of overt speech production , 2009, NeuroImage.

[128]  Evelina Fedorenko,et al.  Syntactic processing is distributed across the language system , 2016, NeuroImage.

[129]  W. K. Simmons,et al.  Circular analysis in systems neuroscience: the dangers of double dipping , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[130]  Nathaniel J. Smith,et al.  The effect of word predictability on reading time is logarithmic , 2013, Cognition.

[131]  Mark D'Esposito,et al.  Variation of BOLD hemodynamic responses across subjects and brain regions and their effects on statistical analyses , 2004, NeuroImage.

[132]  B McElree,et al.  Working memory and focal attention. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[133]  Ingrid S. Johnsrude,et al.  The role of domain-general frontal systems in language comprehension: Evidence from dual-task interference and semantic ambiguity , 2010, Brain and Language.

[134]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  Divide and conquer: A defense of functional localizers , 2006, NeuroImage.

[135]  Sneha Shashidhara,et al.  Individual-subject Functional Localization Increases Univariate Activation but Not Multivariate Pattern Discriminability in the “Multiple-demand” Frontoparietal Network , 2020, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[136]  Kathleen Richardson,et al.  The asymmetrical 'relationship' , 2016, SIGCAS Comput. Soc..

[137]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  A functional dissociation between language and multiple-demand systems revealed in patterns of BOLD signal fluctuations. , 2014, Journal of neurophysiology.

[138]  Susan Goldin-Meadow,et al.  Speech-accompanying gestures are not processed by the language-processing mechanisms , 2019, Neuropsychologia.

[139]  Leon Bergen,et al.  Rational integration of noisy evidence and prior semantic expectations in sentence interpretation , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[140]  J. Duncan The Structure of Cognition: Attentional Episodes in Mind and Brain , 2013, Neuron.

[141]  Ahmet Ademoglu,et al.  Multiple Demand system′s activity predicts individual differences in working memory and fluid intelligence , 2017 .

[142]  Edward Gibson,et al.  The nature of working memory capacity in sentence comprehension : Evidence against domain-specific working memory resources , 2006 .

[143]  Kristof Strijkers,et al.  Grammatical class modulates the (left) inferior frontal gyrus within 100 milliseconds when syntactic context is predictive , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[144]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Language and the aging brain: patterns of neural compensation revealed by functional brain imaging. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[145]  John A. Detre,et al.  SPEECH PRODUCTION : AN fMRI STUDY USING CONTINUOUS ARTERIAL SPIN LABELING , 2008 .

[146]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness , 1985 .

[147]  Chaleece Sandberg,et al.  The relationships between the amount of spared tissue, percent signal change, and accuracy in semantic processing in aphasia , 2016, Neuropsychologia.

[148]  S. Petersen,et al.  Task-Dependent Modulation of Regions in the Left Inferior Frontal Cortex during Semantic Processing , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[149]  T. Hothorn,et al.  Simultaneous Inference in General Parametric Models , 2008, Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift.

[150]  Evelina Fedorenko,et al.  An Attempt to Conceptually Replicate the Dissociation between Syntax and Semantics during Sentence Comprehension , 2019, Neuroscience.

[151]  Hester F. Lingsma,et al.  Nonlinguistic Cognitive Impairment in Poststroke Aphasia , 2014, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[152]  Robert Leech,et al.  The contribution of the inferior parietal cortex to spoken language production , 2012, Brain and Language.

[153]  John C. Trueswell,et al.  Co-localization of Stroop and Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution in Broca's Area: Implications for the Neural Basis of Sentence Processing , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[154]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  The neural mechanisms of speech comprehension: fMRI studies of semantic ambiguity. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[155]  Steven C. Cramer Repairing the human brain after stroke: I. Mechanisms of spontaneous recovery , 2008, Annals of neurology.

[156]  Evelina Fedorenko,et al.  Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences Language and Thought Are Not the Same Thing: Evidence from Neuroimaging and Neurological Patients , 2022 .

[157]  William Schuler,et al.  Left-Corner Parsing With Distributed Associative Memory Produces Surprisal and Locality Effects. , 2018, Cognitive science.

[158]  Ben M. Crittenden,et al.  Task Difficulty Manipulation Reveals Multiple Demand Activity but no Frontal Lobe Hierarchy , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[159]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[160]  Gesa Hartwigsen,et al.  Flexible Redistribution in Cognitive Networks , 2018, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[161]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  DISCOURSE IN PRODUCTION , 1994 .

[162]  Karl G. D. Bailey,et al.  Good-Enough Representations in Language Comprehension , 2002 .

[163]  Evelina Fedorenko,et al.  Reliable individual-level neural markers of high-level language processing: A necessary precursor for relating neural variability to behavioral and genetic variability , 2016, NeuroImage.

[164]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  Broad domain generality in focal regions of frontal and parietal cortex , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[165]  Alexa Bautista,et al.  Neural responses to grammatically and lexically degraded speech , 2016, Language, cognition and neuroscience.

[166]  Randi C. Martin,et al.  A disorder of executive function and its role in language processing. , 2008, Seminars in speech and language.

[167]  J. Trueswell,et al.  Cognitive control and parsing: Reexamining the role of Broca’s area in sentence comprehension , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[168]  E. Gibson Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies , 1998, Cognition.