Can Meaningful Effective Connectivities Be Obtained between Auditory Cortical Regions?

Structural equation modeling (SEM) of neuroimaging data can be evaluated both for the goodness of fit of the model and for the strength of path coefficients (as an index of effective connectivity). SEM of auditory fMRI data is made difficult by the necessary sparse temporal sampling of the time series (to avoid contamination of auditory activation by the response to scanner noise) and by the paucity of well-defined anatomical information to constrain the functional model. We used SEM (i.e., a model incorporating latent variables) to investigate how well fMRI data in four adjacent cortical fields can be described as an auditory network. Seven of the 14 models (2 hemispheres x (6 subjects and 1 group)) produced a plausible description of the measured data. Since the auditory model to be tested is not fully validated by anatomical data, our approach requires that goodness of fit be confirmed to ensure generalizability of connectivity patterns. For good-fitting models, connectivity patterns varied significantly across subjects and were not replicable across stimulus conditions. SEM of central auditory function therefore appears to be highly sensitive to the voxel-selection procedure and/or the sampling of the time series.

[1]  I. Johnsrude,et al.  Spectral and temporal processing in human auditory cortex. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[2]  A. R. McIntosh,et al.  Network analysis of functional auditory pathways mapped with fluorodeoxyglucose: associative effects of a tone conditioned as a Pavlovian excitor or inhibitor , 1993, Brain Research.

[3]  J. Kaas,et al.  Subdivisions of auditory cortex and ipsilateral cortical connections of the parabelt auditory cortex in macaque monkeys , 1998, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[4]  R. Hoyle Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues, and applications , 1997 .

[5]  Robert C. MacCallum,et al.  Model specification: Procedures, strategies, and related issues. , 1995 .

[6]  Tenko Raykov,et al.  Issues in applied structural equation modeling research , 1995 .

[7]  T. Imig,et al.  Auditory cortico‐cortical connections in the owl monkey , 1980, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[8]  P M Bentler,et al.  Structural equation models in medical research , 1992, Statistical methods in medical research.

[9]  A R Palmer,et al.  Time‐course of the auditory BOLD response to scanner noise , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  Dominique Haughton,et al.  Information and other criteria in structural equation model selection , 1997 .

[11]  S. Kapur,et al.  Mapping Neural Interactivity onto Regional Activity: An Analysis of Semantic Processing and Response Mode Interactions , 1998, NeuroImage.

[12]  A. Galaburda,et al.  Cytoarchitectonic organization of the human auditory cortex , 1980, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[13]  A. McIntosh,et al.  Network interactions among limbic cortices, basal forebrain, and cerebellum differentiate a tone conditioned as a Pavlovian excitor or inhibitor: fluorodeoxyglucose mapping and covariance structural modeling. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Network analysis of cortical visual pathways mapped with PET , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[15]  E. Bullmore,et al.  How Good Is Good Enough in Path Analysis of fMRI Data? , 2000, NeuroImage.

[16]  C. Büchel,et al.  Modulation of connectivity in visual pathways by attention: cortical interactions evaluated with structural equation modelling and fMRI. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.

[17]  S. Clarke,et al.  Cytochrome Oxidase, Acetylcholinesterase, and NADPH-Diaphorase Staining in Human Supratemporal and Insular Cortex: Evidence for Multiple Auditory Areas , 1997, NeuroImage.

[18]  Alan R. Palmer,et al.  A high-output, high-quality sound system for use in auditory fMRI , 1998, NeuroImage.

[19]  J V Haxby,et al.  Network analysis of PET-mapped visual pathways in Alzheimer type dementia. , 1995, Neuroreport.

[20]  F. Gonzalez-Lima,et al.  Structural equation modeling and its application to network analysis in functional brain imaging , 1994 .

[21]  Thomas Baer,et al.  A model for the prediction of thresholds, loudness, and partial loudness , 1997 .

[22]  A. McIntosh,et al.  Functional network interactions between parallel auditory pathways during Pavlovian conditioned inhibition , 1995, Brain Research.

[23]  A. McIntosh,et al.  Structural modeling of functional neural pathways mapped with 2-deoxyglucose: effects of acoustic startle habituation on the auditory system , 1991, Brain Research.

[24]  K J Friston,et al.  The predictive value of changes in effective connectivity for human learning. , 1999, Science.

[25]  J. Jaccard,et al.  LISREL Approaches to Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression , 1998 .

[26]  R. Zatorre,et al.  Spectral and temporal processing in human auditory cortex. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[27]  Leslie A. Hayduk Structural equation modeling with LISREL: essentials and advances , 1987 .

[28]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Retinotopy and color sensitivity in human visual cortical area V8 , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.