Future impacts of ozone driven damages on agricultural systems

Abstract Current ozone (O3) concentration levels entail significant damages in crop yields around the world. The reaction of the emitted precursors (mostly methane and nitrogen oxides) with solar radiation contribute to O3 levels that exceed established thresholds for crop damage. This paper shows current and projected (up to 2080) relative yield losses (RYLs) driven by O3 exposure for different crops and the associated economic damages applying dynamic crop production and prices that are calculated per region and period. We adjust future crop yields in the Global Change Assessment Model (GCAM) to reflect the RYLs and analyze the effects on agricultural markets. We find that the changes (generally reductions) in O3 precursor emissions in a reference scenario would reduce the agricultural damages, compared to present, for most of the regions, with a few exceptions including India, where higher future O3 concentrations have large negative impacts on crop yields. The annual economic impact of O3 driven losses from 2010 to 2080 are, in billion US dollars at 2015 prices ($B), 5.0–6.0, 9.8–18.8, 6.7–10.6 and 10.4–12.5 for corn, soybeans, rice and wheat, respectively, with the large losses for wheat and soybeans driven by their comparatively high responses to O3. When O3 effects are explicitly modelled as exogenous yield shocks in future periods, there is a direct impact in future agricultural markets. Therefore, the aggregated net present value (NPV) of crop production would be reduced around by $90.8 B at a global level. However, these changes are not distributed evenly across regions, and the net present market value of the crops would increase by up to $118.2 B (India) or decrease by up to $59.2 B (China).

[1]  K. Calvin,et al.  THE CRITICAL ROLE OF CONVERSION COST AND COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE IN MODELING AGRICULTURAL LAND USE CHANGE , 2020, Climate Change Economics.

[2]  L. Horowitz,et al.  Tropospheric ozone in CMIP6 simulations , 2020, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[3]  F. Jiang,et al.  Influence of surface ozone on crop yield of maize in China , 2020 .

[4]  G. Mills,et al.  Tropospheric ozone pollution reduces the yield of African crops , 2020, Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science.

[5]  H. Tian,et al.  Economic losses due to ozone impacts on human health, forest productivity and crop yield across China. , 2019, Environment international.

[6]  S. Asseng,et al.  Impacts of tropospheric ozone and climate change on Mexico wheat production , 2019, Climatic Change.

[7]  Min Chen,et al.  gcamdata: An R Package for Preparation, Synthesis, and Tracking of Input Data for the GCAM Integrated Human-Earth Systems Model , 2019, Journal of Open Research Software.

[8]  S. Rolinski,et al.  Global historical soybean and wheat yield loss estimates from ozone pollution considering water and temperature as modifying effects , 2019, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology.

[9]  R. Van Dingenen,et al.  Spatial Patterns of Crop Yield Change by Emitted Pollutant , 2019, Earth's future.

[10]  A. Pozzer,et al.  Revisiting the crop yield loss in India attributable to ozone , 2019, Atmospheric Environment: X.

[11]  Qiang Zhang,et al.  Anthropogenic drivers of 2013–2017 trends in summer surface ozone in China , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  R. Van Dingenen,et al.  TM5-FASST: a global atmospheric source–receptor model for rapid impact analysis of emission changes on air quality and short-lived climate pollutants , 2018, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[13]  Meng Li,et al.  Trends in China's anthropogenic emissions since 2010 as the consequence of clean air actions , 2018, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[14]  R. Van Dingenen,et al.  Air quality co-benefits for human health and agriculture counterbalance costs to meet Paris Agreement pledges , 2018, Nature Communications.

[15]  G. Mills,et al.  Closing the global ozone yield gap: Quantification and cobenefits for multistress tolerance , 2018, Global change biology.

[16]  R. Van Dingenen,et al.  Ozone pollution will compromise efforts to increase global wheat production , 2018, Global change biology.

[17]  A. Peters,et al.  Future ozone-related acute excess mortality under climate and population change scenarios in China: A modeling study , 2018, PLoS medicine.

[18]  G. Mills,et al.  Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report: Present-day tropospheric ozone distribution and trends relevant to vegetation , 2018 .

[19]  Frank Ewert,et al.  Ozone effects on crops and consideration in crop models , 2018, European Journal of Agronomy.

[20]  Michael Brauer,et al.  Tropospheric ozone assessment report: Global ozone metrics for climate change, human health, and crop/ecosystem research , 2018, Elementa.

[21]  M. Agrawal,et al.  Ozone Toxicity and Remediation in Crop Plants , 2018 .

[22]  J. Greet,et al.  Global trends of methane emissions and their impacts on ozone concentrations , 2018 .

[23]  Wenjing Shi,et al.  Projecting state-level air pollutant emissions using an integrated assessment model: GCAM-USA. , 2017, Applied energy.

[24]  A. Anav,et al.  Projected global ground-level ozone impacts on vegetation under different emission and climate scenarios , 2017 .

[25]  Irina Petropavlovskikh,et al.  Regional trend analysis of surface ozone observations from monitoring networks in eastern North America, Europe and East Asia , 2017 .

[26]  Y. Wang,et al.  Assessing Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Observed Ground-level Ozone in China , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[27]  E. Ainsworth,et al.  Understanding and improving global crop response to ozone pollution. , 2017, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[28]  P. Kyle,et al.  The SSP4: A world of deepening inequality , 2017 .

[29]  Zhaozhong Feng,et al.  Effects of Ozone on Crops in China , 2017 .

[30]  S. B. Agrawal,et al.  Tropospheric ozone pollution in India: effects on crop yield and product quality , 2017, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[31]  L. Horowitz,et al.  US surface ozone trends and extremes from 1980 to 2014: quantifying the roles of rising Asian emissions, domestic controls, wildfires, and climate , 2016 .

[32]  T. Butler,et al.  The influence of temperature on ozone production under varying NO x conditions – a modelling study , 2016 .

[33]  G. Mills,et al.  Has the sensitivity of soybean cultivars to ozone pollution increased with time? An analysis of published dose–response data , 2016, Global change biology.

[34]  D. Shindell Crop yield changes induced by emissions of individual climate‐altering pollutants , 2016 .

[35]  J. Spadaro,et al.  Chapter 2: A framework for assessing the economic consequences of outdoor air pollution , 2016 .

[36]  J. McGrath,et al.  An analysis of ozone damage to historical maize and soybean yields in the United States , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  E. Stehfest,et al.  Global impacts of surface ozone changes on crop yields and land use , 2015 .

[38]  T. Berntsen,et al.  Evaluating the climate and air quality impacts of short-lived pollutants , 2015 .

[39]  V. Ramanathan,et al.  Recent climate and air pollution impacts on Indian agriculture , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  James A. Edmonds,et al.  ECONOMIC AND PHYSICAL MODELING OF LAND USE IN GCAM 3.0 AND AN APPLICATION TO AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY, LAND, AND TERRESTRIAL CARBON , 2014 .

[41]  C. Heald,et al.  Threat to future global food security from climate change and ozone air pollution , 2014 .

[42]  V. Ramanathan,et al.  Reductions in India's crop yield due to ozone , 2014 .

[43]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Global Distribution and Trends of Tropospheric Ozone: An Observation-Based Review , 2014 .

[44]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Pre-industrial to end 21st century projections of tropospheric ozone from the Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP) , 2012 .

[45]  Stephen Sitch,et al.  The effects of tropospheric ozone on net primary productivity and implications for climate change. , 2012, Annual review of plant biology.

[46]  G. Mills,et al.  New stomatal flux-based critical levels for ozone effects on vegetation , 2011 .

[47]  J. Edmonds,et al.  RCP4.5: a pathway for stabilization of radiative forcing by 2100 , 2011 .

[48]  H. Velthuizen,et al.  Limited potential of crop management for mitigating surface ozone impacts on global food supply , 2011 .

[49]  L. Horowitz,et al.  Global crop yield reductions due to surface ozone exposure: 1. Year 2000 crop production losses and economic damage , 2011 .

[50]  L. Horowitz,et al.  Global crop yield reductions due to surface ozone exposure: 2. Year 2030 potential crop production losses and economic damage under two scenarios of O3 pollution , 2011 .

[51]  D. K. Biswas,et al.  Impacts of methods and sites of plant breeding on ozone sensitivity in winter wheat cultivars , 2009 .

[52]  Iñaki Arto,et al.  Accounting for early action in the European Union Emission Trading Scheme , 2009 .

[53]  G. Moore,et al.  High concentration of surface ozone observed along the Khumbu Valley Nepal April 2007 , 2009 .

[54]  G. Mills,et al.  A comparison of North American and Asian exposure-response data for ozone effects on crop yields. , 2009 .

[55]  Bryan N. Duncan,et al.  Chemical nonlinearities in relating intercontinental ozone pollution to anthropogenic emissions , 2009 .

[56]  Janusz Cofala,et al.  The global impact of ozone on agricultural crop yields under current and future air quality legislation , 2009 .

[57]  William J. Collins,et al.  Multimodel estimates of intercontinental source-receptor relationships for ozone pollution , 2008 .

[58]  L. Horowitz,et al.  Characterizing the tropospheric ozone response to methane emission controls and the benefits to climate and air quality , 2008 .

[59]  Thomas W. Hertel,et al.  Global Agricultural Land Use Data for Climate Change Analysis , 2008, GTAP Working Paper.

[60]  Sergey Paltsev,et al.  Global economic effects of changes in crops, pasture, and forests due to changing climate, carbon dioxide, and ozone , 2007 .

[61]  H. Tian,et al.  Influence of ozone pollution and climate variability on net primary productivity and carbon storage in China's grassland ecosystems from 1961 to 2000. , 2007, Environmental pollution.

[62]  Håkan Pleijel,et al.  Ozone risk assessment for agricultural crops in Europe: Further development of stomatal flux and flux–response relationships for European wheat and potato , 2007 .

[63]  B. Gimeno,et al.  A synthesis of AOT40-based response functions and critical levels of ozone for agricultural and horticultural crops , 2007 .

[64]  Arlene M. Fiore,et al.  Ozone air quality and radiative forcing consequences of changes in ozone precursor emissions , 2007 .

[65]  D Hauglustaine,et al.  The global atmospheric environment for the next generation. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[66]  G. Mills,et al.  Development of a framework for probabilistic assessment of the economic losses caused by ozone damage to crops in Europe , 2006 .

[67]  T. Wigley,et al.  Future Sulfur Dioxide Emissions , 2005 .

[68]  S. Long,et al.  Global food insecurity. Treatment of major food crops with elevated carbon dioxide or ozone under large-scale fully open-air conditions suggests recent models may have overestimated future yields , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[69]  P. Bergamaschi,et al.  European Geosciences Union Atmospheric Chemistry , 2004 .

[70]  D. Mauzerall,et al.  Characterizing distributions of surface ozone and its impact on grain production in China, Japan and South Korea: 1990 and 2020 , 2004 .

[71]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy:: which is the preferred method? , 2004 .

[72]  D. Jacob,et al.  Long‐term trends in ground level ozone over the contiguous United States, 1980–1995 , 1998 .

[73]  W. M. Cox,et al.  Assessment of interannual ozone variation in urban areas from a climatological perspective , 1996 .

[74]  J. Edmonds,et al.  Modelling energy technologies in a competitive market , 1993 .

[75]  A. Knapp Gas Exchange Dynamics in C^3 and C^4 Grasses: Consequence of Differences in Stomatal Conductance , 1993 .

[76]  B. McCarl,et al.  The NCLAN Economic Assessment: Approach, Findings and Implications , 1988 .

[77]  D. McFadden Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .