Why does the light-gradient photovoltage from photosynthetic organelles show a wavelength-dependent polarity?

The light-gradient photovoltage from photosynthetic organisms and organelles is thought to arise from the primary charge separation in the reaction centers. The current explanation of the effect is the stronger excitation of the membrane side of a vesicle facing the light source than the one on the opposite side. Together with the known orientation of reaction centers, this explanation predicts unequivocally the polarity of the photovoltage. However, a polarity opposite to the one expected has often been reported. A dependence of the polarity on the wavelength has been published but no explanation was given (Gräber, P., and H.-W. Trissl. 1981. FEBS Lett. 123:95-99). Here we report on a theoretical treatment of light propagation and interference in pigmented and nonpigmented multilayers. A model calculation is carried out for a pair of membranes, demonstrating the wavelength-dependent light distribution as well as the relative photovoltage and its polarity. When the membranes contain no chromophores or when the absorption coefficient is low, the predicted polarity to that expected from a simple macroscopic absorption behavior. The model is tested by comparing new photovoltage data obtained at 532 nm as well as in the blue and red absorption bands of chlorophyll in chloroplasts. It is concluded that outside the main absorption bands the amplitude and polarity of the photovoltage is determined by the ratio of the refractive indices of the membrane and the medium.

[1]  P. Latimer,et al.  A WAVE‐OPTICS EFFECT WHICH ENHANCES LIGHT ABSORPTION BY CHLOROPHYLL IN VIVO , 1984 .

[2]  C F Fowler,et al.  Direct observation of a light-induced electric field in chloroplasts. , 1974, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[3]  Thomas C. Vogelmann,et al.  PENETRATION OF LIGHT INTO PLANTS , 1989 .

[4]  J. Breton,et al.  Primary electrogenic reactions of Photosystem II as probed by the light-gradient method , 1987 .

[5]  B. Hecks,et al.  INVARIABLE TRAPPING TIMES IN PHOTOSYSTEM I UPON EXCITATION OF MINOR LONG‐WAVELENGTH‐ABSORBING PIGMENTS , 1993 .

[6]  D. Devault,et al.  Investigations of the polarity of the photo-induced electrical signal of chloroplast suspensions , 2004, Photosynthesis Research.

[7]  M Seyfried,et al.  Light gradients in plant tissue. , 1983, Applied optics.

[8]  A. Kleczkowski.  Progress in Photobiology , 1962 .

[9]  P. Gräber,et al.  On the rise time and polarity of the photovoltage generated by light gradients in chloroplast suspensions , 1981 .

[10]  K. Downing,et al.  Two-dimensional structure of plant light-harvesting complex at 37 Å resolution by electron crystallography☆ , 1989 .

[11]  D. Wettstein,et al.  Macromolecular physiology of plastids XIV.Viridis mutants in barley: Genetic, fluoroscopic and ultrastructural characterisation , 1980 .

[12]  W. Junge,et al.  Extremely fast photoelectric signals from suspensions of broken chloroplasts and of isolated chromatophores , 1982 .

[13]  H T Witt,et al.  Electrical evidence for the field indicating absorption change in bioenergetic membranes , 1973, FEBS letters.

[14]  W. Junge,et al.  The slow rise of the flash-light-induced alkalization by Photosystem II of the suspending medium of thylakoids is reversibly related to thylakoid stacking , 1986 .

[15]  J. Breton,et al.  Trapping and annihilation in the antenna system of Photosystem I , 1987 .